The question is, is the info accurate AT ALL or is it just a gimmick for your money. My money is on the latter
MESO-Rx
Anabolic Steroids
Labmax testing "purity"
- Thread starter Wunderpus
- Start date
The question is, is the info accurate AT ALL or is it just a gimmick for your money. My money is on the latter
Then maybe tren from pellets is our best bet? We know the amount of trenbolone ace., and could dilute it accordingly, no?
Or, I could use my Watson from CVS and dilute it by 50% with GSO, and by 95% with GSO.
Thoughts?
Appreciate your input, thanks Jim.
Couldn't this be a somewhat decent way to test your theory? I mean, if that's the case, it'll glow at 5% purity identically to 100% purity (concentration per ml).
If it even is able to detect the actual presence of the hormone then yes
Worked with tren and Watson cyp for me... we will see!
MANWHORE
Subscriber
What do you guys
think about the P31?
think about the P31?
MANWHORE
Subscriber
OK we're scraping the P31..
You want 31 flavors, go to baskin robins
Whenever people misapply the utility of analytical tests problems arise. Calorimetric assays were initially developed a "field tests" to RULE OUT RATHER THAN CONFIRM THE PRESENCE of a controlled substance.
The difference is HUGE bc folk for some reason hate going to JAIL bc a test was a false positive!
That being said, this form of testing has evolved from one that may determine if a PED was present to one that could reveal if that PED was in fact an AAS
However because the structural characteristics of AAS are strikingly similar, the ability of such testing to reliably determine "concentration" is simply a no go fella!
The difference is HUGE bc folk for some reason hate going to JAIL bc a test was a false positive!
That being said, this form of testing has evolved from one that may determine if a PED was present to one that could reveal if that PED was in fact an AAS
However because the structural characteristics of AAS are strikingly similar, the ability of such testing to reliably determine "concentration" is simply a no go fella!
Hmm. I understand that concept fully. I am still curious why we have always had a kryptonite like glow from Pharma grade stuff and tren from pellets, and shittier glow from UGL's.
Surely, the UGLs will discount labmax for a number of reasons, why not?
We don't have those here anymore
MANWHORE
Subscriber
I was just going to say the same thing ..
Jim you beat me to it
Jim you beat me to it
MANWHORE
Subscriber
Because labmax was not created with China raws ..
It would be the same if it was created to test China raws .
Maybe pharmaceutical products would not glow
Under that assumption, then, LE wouldn't be able to ID the illegal drug if it was made from Chinese raws? Hmmmm
MANWHORE
Subscriber
Do you have dunkin donutsWe don't have those here anymore
Then how do you explain the shittier glow from UGLs but Millard's testing program showing many of the products tested, if not all (not 100% up to date on it), to be spot on in concentration?
MANWHORE
Subscriber
Exactly and it's why labmax sucks for the exact people it was made to help ..
And I like it
MANWHORE
Subscriber
Not only is labmax flawed in testing UGL but any test that you didn't conduct yourself is just another trust issue
I don't know, that's a great question. I have some Test E from Darius that was from the same batch, should I LM that and see? Can't hurt..>!
MANWHORE
Subscriber
I'll stick it in my ass and let you know how it labmaxes in 3-4 weeks
