Latest cycle has messed up cholesterol so much, dont want to use again!

seand95

New Member
just ended a 6 week cycle consisting of a front load of sustanon 1g for weeks 1 & 2 along with 800mgs of a deca and eq mix. the following 4 weeks consisted of 700mgs of both prop and tren. each was taken at 100mgs a day. arimidex was taken .5 mg day, along with 20mg nolvadex.
just got my blood tests results back, one week after cycle had ended.
my hdl's are at 9! total is low, didnt get the exact number from the nurse, but somewhere around 100 total. this is bad! i take lecithin, red yeast rice, lots of flax and olive oil, no to mention, a diet low in sat fats! when off, my cholesterol is perfect. total usually around 120, hdl's around 40.
anyone have any advice. i know adex can cause some serious probs with cholsterol, but at the doses i was at, its necessary. is there anyway around this, or is it use and live within the high risk factor all the time?
 
seand95 said:
just ended a 6 week cycle consisting of a front load of sustanon 1g for weeks 1 & 2 along with 800mgs of a deca and eq mix. the following 4 weeks consisted of 700mgs of both prop and tren. each was taken at 100mgs a day. arimidex was taken .5 mg day, along with 20mg nolvadex.
just got my blood tests results back, one week after cycle had ended.
my hdl's are at 9! total is low, didnt get the exact number from the nurse, but somewhere around 100 total. this is bad! i take lecithin, red yeast rice, lots of flax and olive oil, no to mention, a diet low in sat fats! when off, my cholesterol is perfect. total usually around 120, hdl's around 40.
anyone have any advice. i know adex can cause some serious probs with cholsterol, but at the doses i was at, its necessary. is there anyway around this, or is it use and live within the high risk factor all the time?

This should be in the anabolics section bro, but you were using large amounts of gear, so I don't know why you didnt expect bad cholesterol. Have the test done in 4, 8 and 12 weeks time eating well as you do, some cardio etc and see how things pan out. 700mg of tren a week is alot just with prop then you had the front load of 1800mg of gear for 2 weeks... Im not surprised things look bad, it was not 200mg of primo a week!!!
 
i'd have to agree with ronin on this one ... it's alot of gear not to have these kind of neg effects.
 
Im wondering who designed your cycle? Thats about the most f'ed up plan Ive seen.
 
Bob Smith said:
Im wondering who designed your cycle? Thats about the most f'ed up plan Ive seen.


bob ... before you even replied i was thinkin if you've seen this and that would be exactly what you would say. i was going to ask if, you, seand95, researched the cycle before doing it? hope all works out for you bro.
 
esco said:
bob ... before you even replied i was thinkin if you've seen this and that would be exactly what you would say. i was going to ask if, you, seand95, researched the cycle before doing it? hope all works out for you bro.

no offense Bob, but whats wrong with my cycle? is it really the "most f'd up plan youve seen"? because there has been some bad plans out there. im not down with lenghty 12-16 weekers anymore. the acne and post cycle affects sucked. i chose a 6 week burst partly because i just read L. Rea's perfect beast, and i liked the idea of short term cycles for better gains with minimal sides (found that to be different, about the sides that is). but my gains were awsome! my body looks notably different than it did 3 months ago. especially in the density aspect.
really though, please, point out what was so bad about my cycle, besides high doses. i would do it again, if it weren't for the cholesterol. the main reason i chose tren and prop for the latter four weeks, was to end my cycle with fast acting compounds so i could start my pct proto in prep for the next 6 weeks burst. i think a 6 on 4 off is a decent way to do things.
and before further flaming comes about, how many guys do you know that check their blood panels post and pre cycle? im doing my best to find a way to use AAS for maximum benefit with minimal sides. im open for suggestions
 
Sean, I commend you on getting your bloodwork done and being proactive regarding sides and your health.

As for being one of the most f'ed up cycles, yeah, Id say it ranks right up there. 6 weeks, no problem. 1g test, more power to ya. But to start with sust and deca for two weeks and then switch to prop and tren, that just makes no sense whatsoever.
 
Relax. Your numbers will normalize. This is a temporary situation. If you want to be proactive in bring them up sooner, start doing a lot of cardio. Weight training by itself generally has no impact on cholesterol profiles.
 
Yeah, once you did your PCT all the Deca and everything would just be getting started...You should have done short acting esters.

Bob Smith said:
Sean, I commend you on getting your bloodwork done and being proactive regarding sides and your health.

As for being one of the most f'ed up cycles, yeah, Id say it ranks right up there. 6 weeks, no problem. 1g test, more power to ya. But to start with sust and deca for two weeks and then switch to prop and tren, that just makes no sense whatsoever.
 
Seand95, just curious as to how many cycles you have done, and stats? Maybe that will give a better perspective on the amount of gear you were using.

Also, IMO, I wouldn't let the doctor put you on cholesterol lowering medicine, as they can ruin your heart.

I am always able to keep my cholesterol low by eating a lot of rice and oatmeal.
 
Back
Top