Learning the difference between training ON and OFF

Matty19D

Member
Hey guys I'm into week 3 of a Test E cycle, 600mg per week split into two pins. I kickstarted with Dbol which I'll run for 4 weeks. I trained for about 7-8 years, I'm 31 years old now and this is my first cycle.

Here's my question, I've had GREAT results training arms at 20-30 reps PER set. My arms grew more that way than with any other rep scheme. I also tried a squat program a couple years ago and I was squatting twice a week, once real heavy and about 3-4 reps per set, and the other leg day was this 20 rep squat program I read about where you loaded up enough weight to where you'd hit failure by around rep 13 or 14, but you couldn't rack the bar. You had to hold the bar on your back and rest for 30 seconds, bust out another, and repeat till you got your 20....brutal. But my squat skyrocketed and my legs got huge totally natty still.

So now that I'm on cycle and taking a decent amount of Test, would I benefit to high rep schemes on other body parts? What I mean is, does AAS give your body the potential to grow on a whole different level of training? I was thinking of trying 20 rep sets when I do stuff like chest supported rows, single arm dumbell bent rows, lat pulls, stuff like that. This could be a total nobrainer to the vets of aas but I've never found any good reads on it, and, ask and learn is always a good approach even if ya gotta take a flaming lol

What do you think guys, reps to death on everything or stick with a standard 2-5 for strength, 8-12 for size.
 

Sponsors

Latest posts

Back
Top