moralanimal
New Member
I just go finished writing up another court ordered psychological evaluation for child custody. It occurred to me that the reason I get so many of these is, maybe, marriage is outdated. Things change. Depending on who you read the divorce rate is somewhere near 54% (more then half get a divorce). This is slightly overstated b/c those who get a divorce are more likely to get a second divorce and they are put back into the statistic.
Marriage began as a way to ensure our survival as a species. It was a norm to only share food with kin in our caveman days and it also made sure we didnt out strip the land and only took what we needed. In simple and advanced agricultural societies they served to band 2 villages together to again ensure they both had enough food and didnt slaughter each other in war. In industrial societies, due to technology people spread out and no longer needed to worry about food or warring villages. So marriage allowed for financial stability. Oddly enough, money is the biggest reason why couples argue.
It is outdated in my mind. If you love someone why is there a need to enter a religious and legal agreement? We love choices as a society and marriage limits choice and serves to frustrate. I am not saying that you should never enter a committed relationship but why complicate it with laws. Of course 2 parent homes are better for children but not when the 2 parents cant get along. I propose a new way. Every 5 years the marriage needs to be renewed. If the 2 people decide they dont want to renew they both walk away. This would make it like any other legal contract. The only part I have not figured out is how assets will be split up. Maybe people would be willing to keep there money separate b/c it could end in 5 years and anything obtained after the original contract would be split 50-50. I think it would also make people try harder to keep the person they are with happy and not take them for granted b/c it is less perminate. What do you think?
Marriage began as a way to ensure our survival as a species. It was a norm to only share food with kin in our caveman days and it also made sure we didnt out strip the land and only took what we needed. In simple and advanced agricultural societies they served to band 2 villages together to again ensure they both had enough food and didnt slaughter each other in war. In industrial societies, due to technology people spread out and no longer needed to worry about food or warring villages. So marriage allowed for financial stability. Oddly enough, money is the biggest reason why couples argue.
It is outdated in my mind. If you love someone why is there a need to enter a religious and legal agreement? We love choices as a society and marriage limits choice and serves to frustrate. I am not saying that you should never enter a committed relationship but why complicate it with laws. Of course 2 parent homes are better for children but not when the 2 parents cant get along. I propose a new way. Every 5 years the marriage needs to be renewed. If the 2 people decide they dont want to renew they both walk away. This would make it like any other legal contract. The only part I have not figured out is how assets will be split up. Maybe people would be willing to keep there money separate b/c it could end in 5 years and anything obtained after the original contract would be split 50-50. I think it would also make people try harder to keep the person they are with happy and not take them for granted b/c it is less perminate. What do you think?
