I've seen mixed experiences on this whether some people feel like Mast flattens them out and others just see solid gains. My own personal experience with Mast is I've built a lot of solid muscle tissue tbh either that or it dries me out and make me look bigger etc. What's yours ?
MESO-Rx
Anabolic Steroids
Masteron honest opinions for muscle growth?
- Thread starter Manz650
- Start date
BigTomJ
Member
Just a easy, low complexity cycle addition for a bit more tissue.
Nothing crazy, but simple and consistent
Nothing crazy, but simple and consistent
SmallTitsIRL
Member
For me it's just cosmetic effect. I'd rather run EQ or Primo instead
Psy-chonaut
Member
I just look at it as a SERM and a hardener, no overwhelming anabolic effects on me unfortunately
Yea primo just never stuck with me, maybe it was cause I only ran 300mg as my highest dose..
Actually I seen a video of Todd Lee do bloods with his clients on Mast and other BBs on YT they seem to now claim Mast isn't an anti estrogen
LurchingTrim
New Member
From my understanding, Mast has never been anti estrogen but it does mask the symptoms of high estrogen. Take that for what it's worth. Makes running high E2 a bit more comfortable but even at high doses I still run arimidex at .5mg 2-3x a week.
Psy-chonaut
Member
Like I said a SERM (not a AI) it just blocks the receptor, if I recall correctly, it was what it was made for 'Breast cancer' - just blocking the receptor, not lowering estradiol/suicide inhibitor etc...
Ah okay that makes sense, I wouldn't be as familiar with it's full pharmacology.
RockyP
Member
I enjoy mast very much. I'm at the point where I'm not looking to add size, though I get great benefits from it when cutting. If you search online, J3 University has several clients / competitors who, reportedly, made great off season gains by doing nothing gear-wise other than upping their masteron dosage. I haven't tried this myself. The argument people make is that the J3U guys running 1200 test with 1200 mast are...running 1200 test, and that's where the gains are coming from. I think it's more nuanced than that. For a very low aromatizer, EQ and Primo are off the table as secondary anabolics. Lots of guys avoid nandrolone and dont want to use orals in the off season. That doesn't leave much other than higher test with an AI. Also, if you are pushing dosages up high you need to be very mindful of what agrees with your body the most. If say 400 primo works well for you but increased your BP and HCT, and tanks your lipids but 700 of mast does not (it would likely also tank lipids but less likely to impact BP and HCT), you would prob want to use the mast alongside your test.
Is Mast the best secondary anabolic for muscle growth? No. Can it become one for you if you have restrictions on what you can use due to low levels of aromatization and / or health issues from other compounds? Yes. I run Mast almost year round at varying dosages. Love the look that it gives alongside test, and obviously when you add stuff like tren / anavar / winstrol in, you get gnarly looking.
Is Mast the best secondary anabolic for muscle growth? No. Can it become one for you if you have restrictions on what you can use due to low levels of aromatization and / or health issues from other compounds? Yes. I run Mast almost year round at varying dosages. Love the look that it gives alongside test, and obviously when you add stuff like tren / anavar / winstrol in, you get gnarly looking.
LurchingTrim
New Member
SERM effects aside, I do feel like Masteron truly shines when you're running it pretty lean already (<15% BF) as it gives me a harder look. It doesn't aromatize into estrogen which is always a big plus for me when adding additional compounds into my existing stack.
RockyP
Member
Oh yea I forgot to mention that. Over 15% bf skip the masteron. Though I don’t think anyone over 15% should be using anything other than TRT either.
Ironman580
Member
No one asked u dr rocky
adrenalytic
Member
Fatty detected.
