Meditrope Kits US Domestic

[Btop]

NEW PRICE LIST

EMAILS, ORDER AND AUTOLIST IN MY SIGNATURE


USA Domestic Pricing-

Blacktop Meditropes 150iu per kit standard

1 + = $125 ea

Mauvetop Meditropes 120iu per kit standard

1 + = $107 ea


***WHEN PURCHASING NON KIT ITEMS WITHOUT KITS, LIMIT IS TWO / MIX / MATCH / OK***

Bac Water 30ml
w/kits $15
w/o kits $25

Slin Pins 1/2" 30g 1ml Easy Touch (bags of 10)
10 pins w/kits = $8
10 pins w/o kits $18

Slin Pins 1/2" 29g 1ml Exel (bags of 10)
10 pins w/kits = $8
10 pins w/o kits $18

3ml Luer Lock Tip W/23G x 1 1/2 (singles)
5 pins w/kits = $5
5 pins w/o kits = $12

10 pins w/kits = $8
10 pins w/o kits $18

Insulin
Novolin R 1000iu w/kits $38
Novolin R 1000iu w/o kits $48

NovoRapid (log) 1000iu w/kits $70
NovoRapid (log) 1000iu w/o kits $80

Shipping for USA domestic-
1 - 7 = $20
8 kits + = $25
29 kits + = $30

****SHIPPING PRICES CAN CHANGE WITH THE ADDITION OF PINS, BAC WATER AND SLIN.****

 

[B Ware]

NEW PRICE LIST

EMAILS, ORDER AND AUTOLIST IN MY SIGNATURE


USA Domestic Pricing-

Blacktop Meditropes 150iu per kit standard

1 + = $125 ea

Mauvetop Meditropes 120iu per kit standard

1 + = $107 ea


***WHEN PURCHASING NON KIT ITEMS WITHOUT KITS, LIMIT IS TWO / MIX / MATCH / OK***

Bac Water 30ml
w/kits $15
w/o kits $25

Slin Pins 1/2" 30g 1ml Easy Touch (bags of 10)
10 pins w/kits = $8
10 pins w/o kits $18

Slin Pins 1/2" 29g 1ml Exel (bags of 10)
10 pins w/kits = $8
10 pins w/o kits $18

3ml Luer Lock Tip W/23G x 1 1/2 (singles)
5 pins w/kits = $5
5 pins w/o kits = $12

10 pins w/kits = $8
10 pins w/o kits $18

Insulin
Novolin R 1000iu w/kits $38
Novolin R 1000iu w/o kits $48

NovoRapid (log) 1000iu w/kits $70
NovoRapid (log) 1000iu w/o kits $80

Shipping for USA domestic-
1 - 7 = $20
8 kits + = $25
29 kits + = $30

****SHIPPING PRICES CAN CHANGE WITH THE ADDITION OF PINS, BAC WATER AND SLIN.****

 

[PrimoOverTren]

Who needs drama tv when you can just read new source postings. Shit is top notch entertainment

 

[Btop]

Guys, I usually stop by the boards once per day. I check my emails several times throughout the day though.

For faster response time, sending to the email instead of PM would be best. Sending messages through PM is fine but it may take longer for me to reply.

Thanks.

 

[mands]

I don't see why sources have their panties in a bunch about the new testing? If it's more sensitive and everything drops to a lower level what's the big deal?

We can go on and on about the Mands thread but you can also send blind samples in and unless @janoshik is a magician he would be called quite easily.

People are always going to trust that over the literal lab that has a vested interest in selling their GH showing in-house testing that is always 98% with no dimer tests done.

His testing method is not observed by any pharmacopeia standards anywhere on the planet. I’m assuming he’s using some peptide method. But, not 100% certain. I’ve asked many times for him to lay his testing methods out but his cronies and other members really don’t care to know.

So, why should anyone trust his new method? Hasn’t even US pharm samples been sent in blind and they test lower than they did with his original method.

I’m not around much to dig into this whole thing but something is not right.

mands

 

[Btop]

His testing method is not observed by any pharmacopeia standards anywhere on the planet. I’m assuming he’s using some peptide method. But, not 100% certain. I’ve asked many times for him to lay his testing methods out but his cronies and other members really don’t care to know.

So, why should anyone trust his new method? Hasn’t even US pharm samples been sent in blind and they test lower than they did with his original method.

I’m not around much to dig into this whole thing but something is not right.

mands

Glad to see you post man. Good job on your thread back years ago. This place seems to have gone crazy, if you don't jano test, they stone you to death.

I've got questions myself. I don't understand how kits that sell in the medical field that used to test above 99% now test lower than regular generics.

I and many others agree there is something wrong here. Now it seems there's this monopoly going on for testing and they will try to force you into it. Jano test or your stuff is shit.

I'm not good at being forced into anything, that's real life standards as well.

Anyways, I respect you standing up years ago and posting now. If more guys would stand up and post we wouldn't be forced into services we don't want to support. I know they're out there because they PM and email me.

Thanks again bud.

 

[Liska]

I've got questions myself. I don't understand how kits that sell in the medical field that used to test above 99% now test lower than regular generics.

Via the old testing method, any decent generics like Meditrope, Optitropin and dozens of others tested 99%+, many 99.5%+. Pharmaceutical HGH like Genotropin, Norditropin, Saizen, Serostim and Jintropin etc. also tested 99%+, many 99.5%+ as the method was unable to detect any significant differences in purity/quality between these all of the aforementioned. You know for whom this was the biggest blessing? Pharma HGH counterfeiters.

Via the new testing method, pharmaceutical HGH tests at a consistently higher purity (96-98% purity with less than a handful of outliers below this range) than generics (92-96% purity with less than a handful of outliers above this range).

Please show evidence that 'kits used in the medical field' (a descriptor as meaningless as 'pharma grade' applied to products not made by pharmaceutical manufacturers) are testing lower than generics. Evidence does not mean rumours/myths or trying to hide behind people that won't even acknowledge your existence, it means something you can personally show us to prove your point.

Good luck!

 

[janoshik]

Liska, I'm not sure your post will be even noticed among all those touchdowns.

You, other guys, just slow down with all the orders please!

 

[Btop]

Via the old testing method, any decent generics like Meditrope, Optitropin and dozens of others tested 99%+, many 99.5%+. Pharmaceutical HGH like Genotropin, Norditropin, Saizen, Serostim and Jintropin etc. also tested 99%+, many 99.5%+ as the method was unable to detect any significant differences in purity/quality between these all of the aforementioned. You know for whom this was the biggest blessing? Pharma HGH counterfeiters.

Via the new testing method, pharmaceutical HGH tests at a consistently higher purity (96-98% purity with less than a handful of outliers below this range) than generics (92-96% purity with less than a handful of outliers above this range).

Please show evidence that 'kits used in the medical field' (a descriptor as meaningless as 'pharma grade' applied to products not made by pharmaceutical manufacturers) are testing lower than generics. Evidence does not mean rumours/myths or trying to hide behind people that won't even acknowledge your existence, it means something you can personally show us to prove your point.

Good luck!

What do you think about what Mands has to say?

Did you not read his post?

We can pick up where we left off last time.

Are you saying Opti's aren't from a Licensed GMP facility? You never seem to want to answer. I believe you called it "mythical" if I remembered correctly.

TheGreytops were being sold in the medical field because I looked into it at the peak of the sales for them. Opti's are the same, they both scored consistent 99%. TheGreytops had some trouble when they changed factories and I think sales went down.

We could always tell the difference with the old testing. I would expect the opti's and greytops to test above 99% consistently by the old standard. But now by the new standard, you can't tell they are any better unless you run them. The rips tp used to sell scored over 99% and they were about 12 years old.

The meditropes scored above 99% two times that I know of so that's a bad example. We are talking about consistency.

Personally, I don't care if the new testing busts the pharma counterfeiters, most don't even look at pharma grade, the main interest is in generics.

I don't understand, do you want me to post opti labs?

Just go look at them, they should be scoring higher than the others here on the board.

You won't convince me by using the testing to back up what you say because I believe the testing is flawed as many do.

 

[Btop]

Liska, I'm not sure your post will be even noticed among all those touchdowns.

You, other guys, just slow down with all the orders please!

Thanks for stopping by, it's awesome of you fellas to keep us bumped

 

[Liska]

What do you think about what Mands has to say?

Did you not read his post?

We can pick up where we left off last time.

Are you saying Opti's aren't from a Licensed GMP facility? You never seem to want to answer. I believe you called it "mythical" if I remembered correctly.

TheGreytops were being sold in the medical field because I looked into it at the peak of the sales for them. Opti's are the same, they both scored consistent 99%. TheGreytops had some trouble when they changed factories and I think sales went down.

We could always tell the difference with the old testing. I would expect the opti's and greytops to test above 99% consistently by the old standard. But now by the new standard, you can't tell they are any better unless you run them. The rips tp used to sell scored over 99% and they were about 12 years old.

The meditropes scored above 99% two times that I know of so that's a bad example. We are talking about consistency.

Personally, I don't care if the new testing busts the pharma counterfeiters, most don't even look at pharma grade, the main interest is in generics.

I don't understand, do you want me to post opti labs?

Just go look at them, they should be scoring higher than the others here on the board.

You won't convince me by using the testing to back up what you say because I believe the testing is flawed as many do.

Once again, everything decent tested 99%+ by the old method, doesn't matter if it the manufacturer was GMP or TICA certified. Here's some old random generic test result from an OG Meso vendor that never specialized in HGH or even branded their product (removed mail because I haven't asked for permission):


There's so many of these consistent 99%+ generic colourtop results from back in the day if you cared to look, which goes to show the old testing method was either not sufficiently accurate to differentiate between quality of HGH quality or there was an abundance of factories achieving pharmaceutical HGH purity that all shut down at the end of 2020.

You know what also tests ~99% consistently via outdated/insufficient testing method? Pretty much all raws. If it hadn't been for a handful of labs focusing on improving testing methods we'd have no way to consistently produce accurately dosed finished product even now, and in turn at least some chinese manufacturers and wholesellers of AAS as well as HGH are starting to use these test results to improve product quality or choose between manufacturers.

Whether it's TP, Opti or someone completely irrelevant, stop trying to drag others down into your boomer shithole by hiding behind them. Speak for yourself.

PS: I'd still like to use promo code ANGELDUST to get some of your highest quality daily driver please and thank you!!

 

[Sly Devil]

Once again, everything decent tested 99%+ by the old method, doesn't matter if it the manufacturer was GMP or TICA certified. Here's some old random generic test result from an OG Meso vendor that never specialized in HGH or even branded their product (removed mail because I haven't asked for permission):
View attachment 169674

There's so many of these consistent 99%+ generic colourtop results from back in the day if you cared to look, which goes to show the old testing method was either not sufficiently accurate to differentiate between quality of HGH quality or there was an abundance of factories achieving pharmaceutical HGH purity that all shut down at the end of 2020.

You know what also tests ~99% consistently via outdated/insufficient testing method? Pretty much all raws. If it hadn't been for a handful of labs focusing on improving testing methods we'd have no way to consistently produce accurately dosed finished product even now, and in turn at least some chinese manufacturers and wholesellers of AAS as well as HGH are starting to use these test results to improve product quality or choose between manufacturers.

Whether it's TP, Opti or someone completely irrelevant, stop trying to drag others down into your boomer shithole by hiding behind them. Speak for yourself.

PS: I'd still like to use promo code ANGELDUST to get some of your highest quality daily driver please and thank you!!

You contradict yourself quite a bit in this post. There was nothing wrong with the old method. The whole world uses it. Now a guy that once did the shadiest thing we’ve ever seen is the only one using this new method? Yes Jano has made great strides in repairing his past but that dark shadow will always be there. Another thing that doesn’t sit right is that you have been his biggest supporter. If he needs backing up here you come. There’s definitely something underlining there. It’s may be why you are able to test as many products test as you do and maybe even why your products always look great on paper. Can’t imagine what it would cost to do all the testing you’ve done. Thank goodness he’s your bro. There should be no relationship and bros between a source and any testing facility. Especially not with a guy who has admitted to being dishonest and faking reports in the past. Jano is accepted here because he is the only game in town. Every time another means for testing comes along their business blows up until they mysteriously get spooked or busted.

You say that raws test at 99%. Oh no, does that mean we need a new method? Of course not because then you go on to say that these manufacturers are producing a better product and that’s why they score where they do. Could this not have been the same for why a lot of hgh was testing really well as well? Pharmaceutical testosterone test at 99% with Janos method and most Chinese raws for testosterone test at the same but you’re saying that couldn’t of been the case for hgh and that a new method was needed. Now when Jano test pharmaceutical hgh it test all over the place and has shown to even test lower than generics. Does that make sense?

I have no affiliation with this Btop guy and agree that Meso isn’t the place for him but I do understand why he is hesitate to use Jano since Jano admitted to making up an elaborate fake story with a fake report and now is the only one using a method and he can’t be fact checked. Not to mentioned the new testing just doesn’t add up when pharmaceutical is showing to score lower than generics. Your whole argument was that the new method was needed because so many generics shouldn’t be testing where pharmaceuticals do but now generics test higher?

No one is saying let’s not make strides and advancements but everyone should question what’s going on here with hgh testing.

 

[Liska]

You contradict yourself quite a bit in this post. There was nothing wrong with the old method. The whole world uses it. Now a guy that once did the shadiest thing we’ve ever seen is the only one using this new method? Yes Jano has made great strides in repairing his past but that dark shadow will always be there. Another thing that doesn’t sit right is that you have been his biggest supporter. If he needs backing up here you come. There’s definitely something underlining there. It’s may be why you are able to test as many products test as you do and maybe even why your products always look great on paper. Can’t imagine what it would cost to do all the testing you’ve done. Thank goodness he’s your bro. There should be no relationship and bros between a source and any testing facility. Especially not with a guy who has admitted to being dishonest and faking reports in the past. Jano is accepted here because he is the only game in town. Every time another means for testing comes along their business blows up until they mysteriously get spooked or busted.

You say that raws test at 99%. Oh no, does that mean we need a new method? Of course not because then you go on to say that these manufacturers are producing a better product and that’s why they score where they do. Could this not have been the same for why a lot of hgh was testing really well as well? Pharmaceutical testosterone test at 99% with Janos method and most Chinese raws for testosterone test at the same but you’re saying that couldn’t of been the case for hgh and that a new method was needed. Now when Jano test pharmaceutical hgh it test all over the place and has shown to even test lower than generics. Does that make sense?

I have no affiliation with this Btop guy and agree that Meso isn’t the place for him but I do understand why he is hesitate to use Jano since Jano admitted to making up an elaborate fake story with a fake report and now is the only one using a method and he can’t be fact checked. Not to mentioned the new testing just doesn’t add up when pharmaceutical is showing to score lower than generics. Your whole argument was that the new method was needed because so many generics shouldn’t be testing where pharmaceuticals do but now generics test higher?

No one is saying let’s not make strides and advancements but everyone should question what’s going on here with hgh testing.

Yoooooooooooooo what's up it's Sly in the sky, flat earth gang testing higher than any HGH!!! #angeldust #psychonauts #magnets-how? #qanon

 

[Sly Devil]

Yoooooooooooooo what's up it's Sly in the sky, flat earth gang testing higher than any HGH!!! #angeldust #psychonauts #magnets-how? #qanon
View attachment 169677

Great response. I expected nothing less.

Let’s just post weird cat memes

 

[Btop]

Once again, everything decent tested 99%+ by the old method, doesn't matter if it the manufacturer was GMP or TICA certified. Here's some old random generic test result from an OG Meso vendor that never specialized in HGH or even branded their product (removed mail because I haven't asked for permission):
View attachment 169674

There's so many of these consistent 99%+ generic colourtop results from back in the day if you cared to look, which goes to show the old testing method was either not sufficiently accurate to differentiate between quality of HGH quality or there was an abundance of factories achieving pharmaceutical HGH purity that all shut down at the end of 2020.

You know what also tests ~99% consistently via outdated/insufficient testing method? Pretty much all raws. If it hadn't been for a handful of labs focusing on improving testing methods we'd have no way to consistently produce accurately dosed finished product even now, and in turn at least some chinese manufacturers and wholesellers of AAS as well as HGH are starting to use these test results to improve product quality or choose between manufacturers.

Whether it's TP, Opti or someone completely irrelevant, stop trying to drag others down into your boomer shithole by hiding behind them. Speak for yourself.

PS: I'd still like to use promo code ANGELDUST to get some of your highest quality daily driver please and thank you!!

So what you've done here is posted 1 lab report to show a 99% consistency for many different color tops. You must be used to dealing with yes men. Anyone that can think for themselves isn't buying that stuff.

Look at the meditropes-

#87​	97.8%​	4.30mg mauves​
#88​	98.0%​	5.50mg blacks​
#89​	97.7%​	4.46mg mauves​
#90​	98.1%​	5.32mg blacks​
#91​	97.9%​	5.47mg blacks​
#92​	98.2%​	4.69mg mauves​
#93​	97.6%​	5.68mg blacks​
#94​	97.7%​	5.72mg blacks​
#95​	98.0%​	4.79mg mauves​
#96​	99.0%​	5.77mg golden tops​
#97​	98.2%​	5.45mg blacks​
#98​	98.3%​	4.58mg mauves​

#99​	98.2%​	5.51mg blacks​
#100​	99.1%​	4.57mg mauves​
#101​	98.7%​	5.44mg blacks​

#102​

98.9%​

5.24mg blacks​

#103​

98.86%​

4.63mg mauves​

#104​	99.13%​	5.53mg blacks​
#105​	97.5%​	5.59mg blacks​
#106​	98.7%​	5.56mg Golden tops​
#107​	97.7%​	5.63mg blacks​
#108​	97.3%​	4.58mg mauves​
#109​	97.2%​	4.51mg mauves​
#110​	97.4%​	5.63mg blacks​

#111​	97.6%​	4.62mg (13.86iu) mauves​
#112​	98.5%​	5.69mg (17.07 iu) golden​
​	​	​

You still haven't answered about opti's being a "mythical" licensed gmp facility.

Also, you still haven't replied to what mands had to say.

The more you fellas try to make us look bad, it only gives myself and others the opportunity to show the holes in your bullshit.

Stop by anytime dude, you help more than you harm.

As time goes on people will see that we do what we say and deliver every time.

Like me or not, bet I don't take any shit and will continue to sell these meditropes at the lowest USA domestic price.

 

[Liska]

So what you've done here is posted 1 lab report to show a 99% consistency for many different color tops. You must be used to dealing with yes men. Anyone that can think for themselves isn't buying that stuff.

Look at the meditropes-

#87​	97.8%​	4.30mg mauves​
#88​	98.0%​	5.50mg blacks​
#89​	97.7%​	4.46mg mauves​
#90​	98.1%​	5.32mg blacks​
#91​	97.9%​	5.47mg blacks​
#92​	98.2%​	4.69mg mauves​
#93​	97.6%​	5.68mg blacks​
#94​	97.7%​	5.72mg blacks​
#95​	98.0%​	4.79mg mauves​
#96​	99.0%​	5.77mg golden tops​
#97​	98.2%​	5.45mg blacks​
#98​	98.3%​	4.58mg mauves​

#99​	98.2%​	5.51mg blacks​
#100​	99.1%​	4.57mg mauves​
#101​	98.7%​	5.44mg blacks​

#102​

98.9%​

5.24mg blacks​

#103​

98.86%​

4.63mg mauves​

#104​	99.13%​	5.53mg blacks​
#105​	97.5%​	5.59mg blacks​
#106​	98.7%​	5.56mg Golden tops​
#107​	97.7%​	5.63mg blacks​
#108​	97.3%​	4.58mg mauves​
#109​	97.2%​	4.51mg mauves​
#110​	97.4%​	5.63mg blacks​

#111​	97.6%​	4.62mg (13.86iu) mauves​
#112​	98.5%​	5.69mg (17.07 iu) golden​
​	​	​

You still haven't answered about opti's being a "mythical" licensed gmp facility.

Also, you still haven't replied to what mands had to say.

The more you fellas try to make us look bad, it only gives myself and others the opportunity to show the holes in your bullshit.

Stop by anytime dude, you help more than you harm.

As time goes on people will see that we do what we say and deliver every time.

Like me or not, bet I don't take any shit and will continue to sell these meditropes at the lowest USA domestic price.

Yes, Meditrope blacktops & mauvetops never tested 99%+ consistently, they've always been the budget lines compared to the old greytops and have always been inconsistent in quantity, quality and dimer. They were marketed and priced well (for a branded product at least) but rarely ever scored in the upper tier of generics that received much less attention.

You can dig through ProM and Meso for 99%+ 2018-2020 test results yourself - if you'd like to insist these weren't abundant for generics but want others to do the work for you, put your Meso account on the line and I'll make a gallery of old test results for you as a farewell present.

If you want those guys to speak on your behalf, tag them, ask them, don't try to hide behind them. Ask TP as well if he'd like to make a statement in your defense, that'll be fun for everyone except you.

 

[1tank1]

You contradict yourself quite a bit in this post. There was nothing wrong with the old method. The whole world uses it. Now a guy that once did the shadiest thing we’ve ever seen is the only one using this new method? Yes Jano has made great strides in repairing his past but that dark shadow will always be there. Another thing that doesn’t sit right is that you have been his biggest supporter. If he needs backing up here you come. There’s definitely something underlining there. It’s may be why you are able to test as many products test as you do and maybe even why your products always look great on paper. Can’t imagine what it would cost to do all the testing you’ve done. Thank goodness he’s your bro. There should be no relationship and bros between a source and any testing facility. Especially not with a guy who has admitted to being dishonest and faking reports in the past. Jano is accepted here because he is the only game in town. Every time another means for testing comes along their business blows up until they mysteriously get spooked or busted.

You say that raws test at 99%. Oh no, does that mean we need a new method? Of course not because then you go on to say that these manufacturers are producing a better product and that’s why they score where they do. Could this not have been the same for why a lot of hgh was testing really well as well? Pharmaceutical testosterone test at 99% with Janos method and most Chinese raws for testosterone test at the same but you’re saying that couldn’t of been the case for hgh and that a new method was needed. Now when Jano test pharmaceutical hgh it test all over the place and has shown to even test lower than generics. Does that make sense?

I have no affiliation with this Btop guy and agree that Meso isn’t the place for him but I do understand why he is hesitate to use Jano since Jano admitted to making up an elaborate fake story with a fake report and now is the only one using a method and he can’t be fact checked. Not to mentioned the new testing just doesn’t add up when pharmaceutical is showing to score lower than generics. Your whole argument was that the new method was needed because so many generics shouldn’t be testing where pharmaceuticals do but now generics test higher?

No one is saying let’s not make strides and advancements but everyone should question what’s going on here with hgh testing.

Finally....someone with his eyes open that can see/knows what's truly going on behind closed doors.

It's all smoke, mirrors, and deception, with Liska and Jano. They're partners in a business collaboration and they've got personal "buddy" association too so they always back each other up and fight for each other whenever anyone questions or attacks them

I wouldn't trust either of them tbh. They've got no credibility left anymore and I hope more people start realising that they're affiliated blaggers (or maybe even the same person).

If Jano is really an accredited analytical testing service......I think it's about time he made some changes to his website and display a business address/contact info like a genuine business would do instead of having such a secretive/dodgy webpage that only has the option to "email us".

Jano is `supposedly` testing underground steroids and sending out lab reports for us all to believe.......but who's testing Jano??? Who is Jano anyway???
We all know already that he's not a professional person based on his previous scams and the way he talks to people on steroid/bbing forums.
Funnily enough.....steroid forums are the only sites where you will ever see Jano offering analytical services

 

[janoshik]

@1tank1 you onto something!

A great conspiracy that only your genial self was able to observe.

@Liska hello buddy

 

[1tank1]

@1tank1 you onto something!

A great conspiracy that only your genial self was able to observe.

@Liska hello buddy

Why are you tagging Liska (aka your buddy/other persona) in this thread to come and help/support/defend you just like he does in most other threads???

You picked a fight with me and now you've got what you asked for bro so step up and deal with it yourself.

Lets start by addressing the issues with your webpage and your bad attitude and your less than favourable transparency as a legit analytical testing service. Who are you Jano, where is your facility, and why should we trust you? Why did you scam a member and send fake reports for gear that you hadn't even actually tested?

I will need to start a topic about you if you can't provide satisfactory answers coz I think it's time that you were put under the spotlight for the benefit of our community.

Something "ain't right" about you and my gut feeling tells me to be cautious...

 

[Iron_Yuppie]

You still haven't answered about opti's being a "mythical" licensed gmp facility.

GMP is no guarantee of result in purity, it simply means the factory observes industry standard best practices. You can have a pristine kitchen and still overcook a steak.

Most of the ‘generics’ are made by middle school dropouts at a fruit dehydration facility in Wuhan. People still inject that shit into themselves gleefully.

The fact that none of you guys have figured out how to befriend even one corruptible grad student with access to a lab on a university campus is a sad commentary on the lack of creativity and enthusiasm among drug dealers in the year of our Lord 2022. It’s downright sad is what it is.