MikeStrong NPP Labmax

[CensoredBoardsSuck]

See, that's what I am being lead to believe from my own experiences, but our friend @mercury is not very easy to communicate with on matters of labmax possibly being wrong, and I don't know of anyone else with his level of expertise on the topic, so unfortunately I am forced to defer to him more times than not.

Our friend Mercury is the same person that claimed to have been able to calculate the purity on a forged mass spec by simply looking at it. No numbers, no data, no nothing. But he just "knew" the purity by looking at it.

If you are "forced to defer" to anyone, you would do just as well by referring to a tarot card reader.

 

[BigDave]

I have some MS NPP @dmt31. I have to run another labmax, so will do it as well. Will also check batch #. Curious how it compares to yours. BRB

 

[mercury]

RULE NUMBER TWO

The suggestion LM can differentiate not only parent AAS compounds but also their attached ester is UTTERLY ABSURD!

Jim you not chemist and you are talking nonsenses. You do not have any understanding of chemistry you just read Wikipedia and you think that it makes you smart.

testosterone propionate vial A - initial color olive green
testosterone enanthate vial A - initial color orange

NPP - vial A - initial color olive green
deca - vial A - initial color orange

and the list is long

 

[mercury]

Our friend Mercury is the same person that claimed to have been able to calculate the purity on a forged mass spec by simply looking at it. No numbers, no data, no nothing. But he just "knew" the purity by looking at it.

If you are "forced to defer" to anyone, you would do just as well by referring to a tarot card reader.

I am just tired to read the nonsenses.

height of the peak is related to concentration, you can estimate just be quick look without calculations if you have good reference.

You have no clue what you are talking and I am not spending weeks teaching you basic chemistry.

 

[BigDave]

Not the best at deciphering, so here is video of test

 

[ebola]

I am not expert yet on labmax testing but I can see colors.

you have yellow under UV, and dmt31 has something green

so you cannot have both good NPP.

 

[TANGO.ECHO.KILO]

Jim you not chemist and you are talking nonsenses. You do not have any understanding of chemistry you just read Wikipedia and you think that it makes you smart.

testosterone propionate vial A - initial color olive green
testosterone enanthate vial A - initial color orange

NPP - vial A - initial color olive green
deca - vial A - initial color orange

and the list is long

Sorry If this is common knowledge, but @mercury you are a labmax rep no??
As in currently employed by the company?

 

[dmt31]

Not the best at deciphering, so here is video of test

Batch Number?

 

[dmt31]

Not the best at deciphering, so here is video of test

nvm, i saw it, same batch as mine

 

[mercury]

Sorry If this is common knowledge, but @mercury you are a labmax rep no??
As in currently employed by the company?

that gives me idea, to send them my resume

1990-1989 shipper receiver at Nailor Ind
1989-2010 superviser at Bucham Electric
2010-2014 labmax tech support on Meso

but I think that best I can do is just shut the fuck up and no more sharing my experience with labmax since it becomes a controversy here.

 

[dmt31]

that gives me idea, to send them my resume

1990-1989 shipper receiver at Nailor Ind
1989-2010 superviser at Bucham Electric
2010-2014 labmax tech support on Meso

but I think that best I can do is just shut the fuck up and no more sharing my experience with labmax since it becomes a controversy here.

You do realize you still haven't answered my question from the beginning of this whole fiasco....

How can you claim mine is a fail and Nandro's isn't, when you have the same information on both tests, which is just pictures... I don't get it....

 

[TANGO.ECHO.KILO]

that gives me idea, to send them my resume

1990-1989 shipper receiver at Nailor Ind
1989-2010 superviser at Bucham Electric
2010-2014 labmax tech support on Meso

but I think that best I can do is just shut the fuck up and no more sharing my experience with labmax since it becomes a controversy here.

Actually, in this (one) particular instance I'm not trying to be a smart ass.
I legitimately thought you were a representative of that company. If that's not the case, I didn't mean to offend, honestly I guess I just got that impression b/c you post in every single thread concerning Labmax and almost always staunchly defend the results of LM as absolute and infallible.

 

[BIGMESC]

@mercury It is not that we don't value your opinion but TEK has a point and a valid question.

If you just love LM and think its as versatile as it appears you do then that is fine, if you are a rep or official tech support paid or not that is fine too.

Taking offence to the question seems strange to me.

 

[mercury]

@mercury It is not that we don't value your opinion but TEK has a point and a valid question.

If you just love LM and think its as versatile as it appears you do then that is fine, if you are a rep or official tech support paid or not that is fine too.

Taking offence to the question seems strange to me.

let's puts this way it became almost my hobby, I also like chemistry although I am not have diploma in chemistry.

I used to play with trains, collect stamps, play with electronics. This is just something new and fun to do.

 

[BIGMESC]

let's puts this way it became almost my hobby, I also like chemistry although I am not have diploma in chemistry.

I used to play with trains, collect stamps, play with electronics. This is just something new and fun to do.

I am not big on diploma's most people in my position now days have one, I am old school and work my way up or slept my way up (nothing older school than that) JK,
It has limited my options because there is a lot of weight assigned to having one these days, but most of them that have them are morons.

Thanks for the input, I know I always want your comments when I do a LM test.

 

[CensoredBoardsSuck]

You do realize you still haven't answered my question from the beginning of this whole fiasco....

How can you claim mine is a fail and Nandro's isn't, when you have the same information on both tests, which is just pictures... I don't get it....

There is a definite pattern here. Have a look at this thread: https://thinksteroids.com/community/threads/napsgear-org.134360565/page-3#post-1168389

 

[dmt31]

There is a definite pattern here. Have a look at this thread: https://thinksteroids.com/community/threads/napsgear-org.134360565/page-3#post-1168389

I just don't get what his agenda is... He obviously has an agenda. I tested from the same exact source, our test results are very similar, and are identical in the non UV pictures, but mine is a fail and his is a pass... it really makes no sense and he refuses to address it.

 

[Dr JIM]

Jim you not chemist and you are talking nonsenses. You do not have any understanding of chemistry you just read Wikipedia and you think that it makes you smart.

testosterone propionate vial A - initial color olive green
testosterone enanthate vial A - initial color orange

NPP - vial A - initial color olive green
deca - vial A - initial color orange

and the list is long

Oh please Merc give it a break.
I have a chemistry undergraduate degree and frequent a lab that does analytical testing 2-3 times a week.

I also know you have failed to support ANYTHING about LM with evidence based literature.

You want to blindly shill for LM that's your business but when you do so on Meso and the above failings are rightfully noted you become overly defensive.

Post the evidence or EXPECT more of the same!

 

[Dr JIM]

I am just tired to read the nonsenses.

height of the peak is related to concentration, you can estimate just be quick look without calculations if you have good reference.

You have no clue what you are talking and I am not spending weeks teaching you basic chemistry.

Oh and although one can use either the peak height or surface area to determine concentration, they don't mean shit unless one uses a REFERENCE to compare it to.

And I'm talking about a reference standard that has been calibrated and then compared to the sample in question, rather than your level of "experience" being substituted as "the reference"!