MyoGen SustaGen 250 - HPLC/TAMC/TYMC - 2019-03 - SIMEC via AnabolicLab.com

[AnabolicLab.com]

MyoGen Sustagen 250 was determined to have an actual content of 62 mg/ml testosterone phenylpropionate, 65 mg/ml testosterone isocaproate, 104 mg/ml testosterone decanoate and 31 mg/ml testosterone propionate.

Microbiological contamination was detected. No yeast or mold contamination was detected.

Steroid analytics courtesy of AnabolicLab.com: MyoGen Sustagen 250 Lab Test Results

View media item 1937
View media item 1936

 

[kokorico]

Is it the first lab on anaboliclabs testing positive for microbiological detection ? cause i don't remenber ever seen any labs testing positive.

is that the anabolic revolution ?

 

[Den84]

Is it the first lab on anaboliclabs testing positive for microbiological detection ? cause i don't remenber ever seen any labs testing positive.

is that the anabolic revolution ?

the absurd thing is that this brand is overpriced, there are around brands that cost much less and have an excellent level of sterility. now I'm wondering ... what can cause microbiological contamination in our body? just a few pips or worse problems?

 

[MindlessWork]

Hmmm the report didn't say any microbiological contamination was detected but the OP says so? Maybe a typo I think.

 

[MisterSuperGod]

Hmmm the report didn't say any microbiological contamination was detected but the OP says so? Maybe a typo I think.

That's what it looks like. They forgot the word NO. i do the same thing, especially when i post while i'm at work, even after proofreading it 3 times before posting.

 

[MindlessWork]

That's what it looks like. They forgot the word NO. i do the same thing, especially when i post while i'm at work, even after proofreading it 3 times before posting.

Oh yes I spend countless time myself reading and rereading the project status emails that I send every week to my team lead and changing this changing that...OCD to the max

Even simple word like "no" getting left out changes the whole meaning of what is written. Perhaps Millard can fix the post

 

[Test_Subject]

Hmmm the report didn't say any microbiological contamination was detected but the OP says so? Maybe a typo I think.

The TAMC (Total Aerobic Microbial Count) is listed as "detectable" meaning that they found something. That's the test for bacteria.

The TYMC (Total Yeast and Mold Count), which is a yeast and mold test, came back undetectable (negative).

 

[Test_Subject]

I guess "make sterile gear" is step 562 of their revolution.

They'll get around to it at some point. I think that they're around step 450 at the moment.

 

[T-Bagger]

The TAMC (Total Aerobic Microbial Count) is listed as "detectable" meaning that they found something. That's the test for bacteria.

The TYMC (Total Yeast and Mold Count), which is a yeast and mold test, came back undetectable (negative).

I guess "make sterile gear" is step 562 of their revolution.

They'll get around to it at some point. I think that they're around step 450 at the moment.

I don’t take it that way - because they ran a detectable test but it came back as N, I read that as no microbial contaminants were found.

 

[janoshik]

I don’t take it that way - because they ran a detectable test but it came back as N, I read that as no microbial contaminants were found.

That "N" means that the said test is not accredited nor validated.

Also @Millard Baker recently mentioned that SIMEC changed their microbiological contamination protocol, but provided no further information.

 

[Test_Subject]

I don’t take it that way - because they ran a detectable test but it came back as N, I read that as no microbial contaminants were found.

The "N" just means that the test wasn't put through a validation protocol audit to ensure that proper testing standards were applied.

 

[T-Bagger]

That "N" means that the said test is not accredited nor validated.

Also @Millard Baker recently mentioned that SIMEC changed their microbiological contamination protocol, but provided no further information.

The "N" just means that the test wasn't put through a validation protocol audit to ensure that proper testing standards were applied.

Thanks for the clarification.

 

[MindlessWork]

So if there's any amount of bacterial contamination detected that's not good at all from a UGL or pharma.

 

[Savagesteve]

So if there's any amount of bacterial contamination detected that's not good at all from a UGL or pharma.

Exactly. Especially seeing as how they spent the extra bread to make amps and it’s still not sterile.

 

[Millard]

That "N" means that the said test is not accredited nor validated.

Also @Millard Baker recently mentioned that SIMEC changed their microbiological contamination protocol, but provided no further information.

SIMEC switched from a quantitative test for bacteria to a qualitative test.

So rather than 'count' to detect certain number of bacteria, SIMEC provides a 'yes or no' answer to whether the sample contains any bacteria, yeast or mold at all.

 

[T-Bagger]

SIMEC switched from a quantitative test for bacteria to a qualitative test.

So rather than 'count' to detect certain number of bacteria, SIMEC provides a 'yes or no' answer to whether the sample contains any bacteria, yeast or mold at all.

So in this case, no bacterial contamination or mold was detected, correct?

 

[Millard]

So in this case, no bacterial contamination or mold was detected, correct?

"Microbiological contamination was detected. No yeast or mold contamination was detected."

 

[T-Bagger]

"Microbiological contamination was detected. No yeast or mold contamination was detected."

Well shit, I guess I can’t read

 

[master.on]

The TAMC (Total Aerobic Microbial Count) is listed as "detectable" meaning that they found something. That's the test for bacteria.

The TYMC (Total Yeast and Mold Count), which is a yeast and mold test, came back undetectable (negative).

@AnabolicLab.com can you please contact SIMEC to confirm it it's a typo or if microbiological contamination was actually found.

Because if it's the latter, the report should have listed some kind of measure of how many bacteria were found (i.e. CFU/g or Most Probable Number)

Not to whitewash @Andre-Myogen but I find it hard to believe that they sourced 4 pharma grade testosterones, only to skip sterile filtration.

 

[mp46]

@AnabolicLab.com can you please contact SIMEC to confirm it it's a typo or if microbiological contamination was actually found.

Because if it's the latter, the report should have listed some kind of measure of how many bacteria were found (i.e. CFU/g or Most Probable Number)

Not to whitewash @Andre-Myogen but I find it hard to believe that they sourced 4 pharma grade testosterones, only to skip sterile filtration.

Here’s your answer.

SIMEC switched from a quantitative test for bacteria to a qualitative test.

So rather than 'count' to detect certain number of bacteria, SIMEC provides a 'yes or no' answer to whether the sample contains any bacteria, yeast or mold at all.