Naps and BBBG

he’s spamming the fuck out of his own thread by intentionally posting tons of “reviews” for the sake of keeping his thread relevant and on top. Within the first 24 hours of that thread being open, there were SEVERAL posts, none of which posted anything other than reviews with feels and good to go. There was nothing of substance in any of those posts.

Your argument was that naps wasn’t spamming because the definitions of spam is when you send out the same message over and over, word for word. So therefore, technically naps isnt spamming
No. This was never my argument.

Flooding the forum with the same message over and over is one of the most clear-cut case of spam.

Please read my post above about content. If anyone is posting unique and original product photos, particularly in a thread about steroid photo porn, then is obviously with substance and relevant to the topic.

Furthermore, it would be hypocritical to ban one source for posting original product photos while allowing dozens and even hundreds of others to have posted their own product photos. It would be nonsensical and illogical especially given the fact that members have been demanding sources to do this exact same thing for years.
 
No. This was never my argument.

Flooding the forum with the same message over and over is one of the most clear-cut case of spam.

Please read my post above about content. If anyone is posting unique and original product photos, particularly in a thread about steroid photo porn, then is obviously with substance and relevant to the topic.

Furthermore, it would be hypocritical to ban one source for posting original product photos while allowing dozens and even hundreds of others to have posted their own product photos. It would be nonsensical and illogical especially given the fact that members have been demanding sources to do this exact same thing for years.
With all due respect there is nothing unique or original in their posting. Its like a bot is doing it.

I seriously doubt there's any members here that approve of what is going on. If there are, please speak up.

There are people viewing this forum that are looking for a source. What happens if they order and get scammed which could be prevented if they weren't allowed to post here.

Did you ever adress the doxxing? This is a well known fact.
 
First of all MESO is not a source board. It is not a source board no matter how badly some members want it to be.

That is, MESO does not pick and choose who is allowed to participate. Some forums only allow paid sources to participate; others claim to only allow "good" sources to participate.

For better or worse, MESO allows ALL sources to participate - the good, the bad, the shitty. The reason is that the goal of MESO is to hold ALL SOURCES accountable.

So, yeah, the "shitty dues" will always be around but MESO exists to hold them accountable.
I can appreciate that the forum is not a source board, and for that main reason I am on this forum and one other that doesn’t allow sources AT ALL.

I do genuinely appreciate this board and what it stands for.

but I’m telling you, no one else sees your actions as you say they are. I think I am the only one so blatantly saying what I am saying, but I’m certain that many of the regulars see things the same way I do. It’s your forum and your rules and you can interpret them however you choose. But as of right now, it looks like you’re taking the side of a vendor because a member called them out using the exact same words in a few posts (I haven’t actually seen exactly what got bbbg banned, but that’s what I’ve been les to understand). Take a look from a members perspective, not the forum admin perspective, and you’ll likely see the favoritism about which I’m speaking.

what type of ban would a member get for threatening to dox another member?
 
No. This was never my argument.

Flooding the forum with the same message over and over is one of the most clear-cut case of spam.

Please read my post above about content. If anyone is posting unique and original product photos, particularly in a thread about steroid photo porn, then is obviously with substance and relevant to the topic.

Furthermore, it would be hypocritical to ban one source for posting original product photos while allowing dozens and even hundreds of others to have posted their own product photos. It would be nonsensical and illogical especially given the fact that members have been demanding sources to do this exact same thing for years.


What this cunt is posting is generated "content" he is running a script. Supervised yes but not the less it's spam! Any retard can run this code. It should be obvious.
 
What this cunt is posting is generated "content" he is running a script. Supervised yes but not the less it's spam! Any retard can run this code. It should be obvious.
And scripts can also create accounts as well. Exactly what spammers do in fact as it's possible to create hundreds of accounts in a very short time with such scripts.

Basically Naps' script pulls reviews off his site and makes posts in that thread perhaps using those 2 rep accounts as the usernames to make the posts.
 
i don't need fake reviews to move my merchandise. My customers are happy... or the PIP is so bad that they can't see straight enough to type, but either way, no bad reviews.
Gotta be honest. If it wasn't for your pip, I would still be a whiney little bitch and I'm sure I speak for others here.
 
We've had other sources here that were straight trash.

And members like myself, CBS, and many others repeatedly posted the same thing over and over word for word in their threads such as "Known scammer do not buy" the only difference for between them and naps was the size of the operation and the fact they didn't have a PAID Sponsor banner on the site.

Its your site Millard and I believe in the freedom run your personal paid for operation anyway you see fit enforcing the rules as you see fit but this one (naps vs BBBG situation) and how the optics seem to favor the paying sponsor is not a good look for the site at all
 
Back
Top