NeoAnabolics
Subscriber
HAPPY NEW YEARS TO EVERYONE!!!
May 2025 bring prosperity and health to all of you and your family!
May 2025 bring prosperity and health to all of you and your family!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Sealed. Thank you for catching that.
this is a nice incentive… like vanargandar said it’s more than what sources on here offer… this shows you are serious about your brand and quality… good job… looking forward to your new testing coming up… I don’t think any source on here is covering cost of hplc testing here… would make you the first…While you are correct, I believe that it gives members an incentive to at least get blood work done which helps with monitoring their health. Hmm, I could offer to reimburse the cost of the HPLC test ($120), plus $120 store credit total of $240 or store credit of $240.
@Vanargandar @AlexDavis43 Please chime in.
Thank you! I believe Jano is now including picture of sample sent in without additional cost. This is great for both the customer and the source. The dismisses the potential of a scam, if a customer sends in a sealed vial with it’s original label. There is no potential for going back and fourth on whether or not product is from the source.this is a nice incentive… like vanargandar said it’s more than what sources on here offer… this shows you are serious about your brand and quality… good job… looking forward to your new testing coming up… I don’t think any source on here is covering cost of hplc testing here… would make you the first…
They can’t update it after so longThis may be a stupid question but why is it so hard for vendors to keep the list updated on the first post?
Neo, thanks for stepping up the testing challenge. I look forward to seeing the results.
No such thing as stupid questions sir. It is because it gets deleted after 30 days on privatebin. I post new ones when they expire but they get burried in the thread. I will post a new one today. I believe testing raws should be done by every source, benefits both the client and the source.This may be a stupid question but why is it so hard for vendors to keep the list updated on the first post?
Neo, thanks for stepping up the testing challenge. I look forward to seeing the results.
https://privatebin.net/?4c7d309cd4f0c567#6ctudaoquxreSMpv83LUNmkbYGQTMB8ZGYfrKXRFuZ1j
This may be a stupid question but why is it so hard for vendors to keep the list updated on the first post?
Neo, thanks for stepping up the testing challenge. I look forward to seeing the results.
They can’t update it after so long
Well done Neo! Thank you. Could you update the enhanced testing thread with your results moving forward?Hello guys, happy friday! I received this batch of raws labeled as Test E from a supplier, so it was labeled as such and sent in for testing. As we can see, it tested for Test Cyp. This is why testing raws for sources is vital. This could potentially have ruined my up coming batch had it been NPP or Test Prop instead. Even for sources that brew Test C at 200 mg/ml this could have been an issue. I am still waiting for the remainder of the testing to be sent to me.View attachment 310258