I'm about to start some sust and I was wondering if this could be true. People who have used sustanon on a twice per week basis have noted significant gains, not much less than the recomended everyother day. Of course shooting every other day will produce more dramatic gains because simply there is more testosterone. The argument seems to be that people believe in keeping the blood levels at a consistant rate. Yet, some still gain better with sust than a single, long acting ester such as enanthate. My belief is that it might be just as good, mabye even better to get extremely high peak levels rather than a consistant but lower level of testosterone in the blood. If one were to inject 2cc of sust at a time, twice per week instead of four 1 cc shots a week, I think that person's gains would be more dramatic. I think the idea of higher peak levels makes for better gains, the ony problem then is retaining them. Take dbol for example, it is in and out of your blood in about 5 hours, yet it has significant effects on gains, even if taken in a single dose daily. Im no professional but I have experiemented with this myself. When, for example, I hit a platue during my cycle, I tend to change up my routine a bit and normally it works. For instance, instead of splitting my dbol dosage throughout the day, I will take the whole daily dose in one serving early in the day. This completely pushes my body to grow, regardless of how accustom my body has become to test. Like I said, I might be wrong, but I think there is something good about higher peak test levels, even if they are sustained consistantly. Its like asking what does more damage, rain for a week straight or a flood storm on a single day? You may see my point. I just figure there has to be a reason why sust is so popular when the tests that are supposed to be more reliable are cheaper and easier to find.
