OEP LABS Domestic

[crispybacon!]

Assuming the one tested is the dark/later batch, which I am pretty confident it is, then yes from what was discussed way back when the light 'testing' batch will probably come in a few percent lower.

Personally, anything within ±5% is fantastic for my use case, and anything within ±10% is acceptable. On a side note: Most folks are happy to see things overdosed, which is cool from a value perspective, but falls into the same criteria as above IMO. The more accurate the better in either case.

I’m not overly concerned about the concentration. It’s just a little surprising because I think Pench was speculating that this might come in around 530.

@OEP LABS - Do you think you’ll ever get to a point where you are able to test raws before brewing and test finished product before selling? Is this even something you’re considering?

 

[AllbrandNew]

View attachment 356126
For what it’s worth, this is my bloodwork on .5mL of the test D, twice a week.

I was waiting to hit 6 weeks on the TD to check mine, but maybe 4 weeks is enough...Hmmmm.

 

[johnsonenlarge]

@OEP LABS whats an email to contact you? I can't find one

 

[Rogal69]

@OEP LABS whats an email to contact you? I can't find one

It’s the first line in his Pastebin

 

[johnsonenlarge]

It’s the first line in his Pastebin

My bad, i haven’t been on this forum for awhile, where would i find that?

 

[Vikingo]

My bad, i haven’t been on this forum for awhile, where would i find that?

Search “Pastebin” this thread

 

[OEP LABS]

This means the raws were far more degraded than my educational guess of 6~7%. Factor in what’s needed to reach 500mg is another 8% plus my educational guess of 6.5%. That’s 14.5% on degraded raws. Input the 6.5% amongst the 462mg/ml, this is in regards to the light volunteer batch ONLY 20-30 bottles, that was made right at 500mg/ml because I didn’t believe anyone it would hold at 500mg/ml with 22%BB. Which makes the light volunteer batch
432mg/ml.

Yea I didn’t see this coming either. Assume next time I will wait for the raw purity report is the only way to go about this next time

We have more coming, can give discount or you guys let me know how to accommodate

 

[OEP LABS]

it’s frustrating inputting a degradation value and overdosing to find out the raws are another 8% degraded geez. No excuses I shouldve waiting for the purity report. A little shocking nowadays to see raws degraded into the mid 80’s not going to lie. No matter il take accountability this is how I will learn not to repeat bad history.

Shoot me some ideas men would like to make everyome whole on what was paid for

 

[RockyP]

This is what I do with mine. I add a tiny label with true concentration and a QR code that links to Jano report. I keep the beautiful clear label on.

View attachment 356122

Wow. Thats pretty awesome.

 

[cap’nboldenone]

it’s frustrating inputting a degradation value and overdosing to find out the raws are another 8% degraded geez. No excuses I shouldve waiting for the purity report. A little shocking nowadays to see raws degraded into the mid 80’s not going to lie. No matter il take accountability this is how I will learn not to repeat bad history.

Shoot me some ideas men would like to make everyome whole on what was paid for

It sucks that the raws were that degraded, but the dosing on the oil is off by less than 8%. You don’t owe us anything man, you’re more bothered by it than we are haha. I think you’re right that these days more than ever you’ve gotta test raws before you brew anything.

 

[RockyP]

At the end of the day anyone with the Test D has a very reasonably priced T450+ with zero PIP. if I had the chance to obtain any of the TD500 I’d be totally fine with these results. Next batch can be approached differently however Pench wants to go about it.

 

[Erock523]

It sucks that the raws were that degraded, but the dosing on the oil is off by less than 8%. You don’t owe us anything man, you’re more bothered by it than we are haha. I think you’re right that these days more than ever you’ve gotta test raws before you brew anything.

Seriously! lol if anyone is unhappy with their test d send it to me. I will properly dispose of it

 

[maddie]

it’s frustrating inputting a degradation value and overdosing to find out the raws are another 8% degraded geez. No excuses I shouldve waiting for the purity report. A little shocking nowadays to see raws degraded into the mid 80’s not going to lie. No matter il take accountability this is how I will learn not to repeat bad history.

Shoot me some ideas men would like to make everyome whole on what was paid for

The only way make us whole is to make more so we can buy more! Im excited to use mine and apprice the calculation so I can dose accordingly.

 

[CharlesV]

The only way make us whole is to make more so we can buy more!

it’s the only way!

 

[TanFishMan]

85% purity raws makes me feel uneasy, I know it’s filtered and all but that’s a lot of extra who knows what even if it’s overdosed to reached accurate concentration. Almost everyone in the raws thread was pissing and shitting over 89% npp. Pretty new to this. Rest of y’all not concerned?

At what low purity do people become concerned if the dosing and color come out reasonable?

 

[AllbrandNew]

85% purity raws makes me feel uneasy, I know it’s filtered and all but that’s a lot of extra who knows what even if it’s overdosed to reached accurate concentration. Almost everyone in the raws thread was pissing and shitting over 89% npp. Pretty new to this. Rest of y’all not concerned?

At what low purity do people become concerned if the dosing and color come out reasonable?

I don't know dick about chemistry or brewing, but I was under the impression that degradation essentially meant a percentage of material was rendered inert, rather than it being some kind of contamination. I.E.: Let sealed raws sit in a poor storage location and they lose potency, but aren't necessarily getting filled with any contaminants or anything.

Someone can correct me if that is wrong though, please.

Edit: If that's accurate, folks would scoff at lower purity raws since they are getting fewer mg/g total for the same price I'd think.

 

[OEP LABS]

At the end of the day anyone with the Test D has a very reasonably priced T450+ with zero PIP. if I had the chance to obtain any of the TD500 I’d be totally fine with these results. Next batch can be approached differently however Pench wants to go about it.

Thank you Rocky, Definitely will wait for the purity report before proceeding on the next batch

Let us pray it passes customs but this vendor has made it happen several times.

I’m not overly concerned about the concentration. It’s just a little surprising because I think Pench was speculating that this might come in around 530.

@OEP LABS - Do you think you’ll ever get to a point where you are able to test raws before brewing and test finished product before selling? Is this even something you’re considering?

I’m very surprised, and you’re right @crispybacon! thats the only way to approach this. Is basically wait for purity report before synthesizing the material.

Question though. Example like Mast prop we will only have a small batch incoming. Do we approach small batches in the same manner? Small batch meaning less than 200g

No matter though I’m going to take action for those that purchased TD-500, going to give you Men a 10% off your next purchase. I know I won’t remember everyone that purchased, will do a Scouts Honor. Don’t hesitate to use it either.

 

[RockyP]

Thank you Rocky, Definitely will wait for the purity report before proceeding on the next batch

Let us pray it passes customs but this vendor has made it happen several times.


I’m very surprised, and you’re right @crispybacon! thats the only way to approach this. Is basically wait for purity report before synthesizing the material.

Question though. Example like Mast prop we will only have a small batch incoming. Do we approach small batches in the same manner? Small batch meaning less than 200g

No matter though I’m going to take action for those that purchased TD-500, going to give you Men a 10% off your next purchase. I know I won’t remember everyone that purchased, will do a Scouts Honor. Don’t hesitate to use it either.

I’m in favor of brewing the mast before testing but I know others may disagree. @OEP LABS any chance we can do a mast P at 200 / ml? Or 150?

 

[AbsoluteKnight]

I’m in favor of brewing the mast before testing but I know others may disagree. @OEP LABS any chance we can do a mast P at 200 / ml? Or 150?

That would be assume I’m pretty sure we had that discussion before though and people didn’t want 200 “cus it hurts” or something

 

[RockyP]

That would be assume I’m pretty sure we had that discussion before though and people didn’t want 200 “cus it hurts” or something

Shit. I forgot. I think you’re right. 100 / ml is fine.