OEP LABS Domestic

True it does seem good trt blend. However, not satisfied with my calculations though. I will go back and see where i was off. I will learn it 100%
@OEP LABS I’m noticing that the ratios of the various esters on the finished product don’t match the ratios of the raw testing. Is that to be expected? Is it possible the raw material you received wasn’t well mixed and so the raw sample just wasn’t representative of the entire batch? So maybe not an issue with your lab work, per se. I’m not familiar with the chemistry involved, so apologies if I’m bringing up something irrelevant.
 
@OEP LABS I’m noticing that the ratios of the various esters on the finished product don’t match the ratios of the raw testing. Is that to be expected? Is it possible the raw material you received wasn’t well mixed and so the raw sample just wasn’t representative of the entire batch? So maybe not an issue with your lab work, per se. I’m not familiar with the chemistry involved, so apologies if I’m bringing up something irrelevant.
I’ll get to the bottom of it, I have the report printed. Gonna grab some roadkill off the road. Chow down and put that pencil to work
 
The Susta-Lube Hplc Report

Im going to have to go back and look at the report to see where my calculations were a bit off. None the less the report.

Janoshik Analytical


Edit: attached the Label for sust-lube
To me the ones that are higher would rather them be higher. I think it worked out perfect! Perfect blend! Raws could have been calculation! If they all tested like this no complaints here! Glad I partake into the sustalube as deep as I did!
 
@OEP LABS I’m noticing that the ratios of the various esters on the finished product don’t match the ratios of the raw testing. Is that to be expected? Is it possible the raw material you received wasn’t well mixed and so the raw sample just wasn’t representative of the entire batch? So maybe not an issue with your lab work, per se. I’m not familiar with the chemistry involved, so apologies if I’m bringing up something irrelevant.
Keen eye and good thinking.
 
@OEP LABS I’m noticing that the ratios of the various esters on the finished product don’t match the ratios of the raw testing. Is that to be expected? Is it possible the raw material you received wasn’t well mixed and so the raw sample just wasn’t representative of the entire batch? So maybe not an issue with your lab work, per se. I’m not familiar with the chemistry involved, so apologies if I’m bringing up something irrelevant.
You might be onto something Crispy. I worked the numbers along with the 10% overdose and the 5.2% impurity and my calculations are about same on label. Tonight I'll contact Jano team maybe I'm not inputting a certain variable, I'm sure they will explain to me. in the meantime I'll check my notes when this was brewed. A bit shocked This compound is more potent than I expected 280mg/ml
 
The Susta-Lube Hplc Report

Im going to have to go back and look at the report to see where my calculations were a bit off. None the less the report.

Janoshik Analytical


Edit: attached the Label for sust-lube
I am really excited to try this, I think it will be perfect for the cruise I will be getting ready to start in the new year. Joints could really use some of the low dose Deca in my older age.

Enjoy the holidays Pench, I am looking forward to ordering this and some Ment in the new year
 
The Test Decaonate came In at 96% purity so I imputed the value of 4% for the impurity. Then additionally added a factor of 3% ooverdose for any minute discrepancy caused by either scale, glass equipment and human error. Divided the entire batch by 505mg not 500mg, yes wanted this one pretty bad to be over and not under.

That would would make it 4% overdose with the impurity corrected and 1% error accounted. Which is spot on 500x.04‎ = 20



520mg/ml. Reports states 525 that a head shot.
 
The Test Decaonate came In at 96% purity so I imputed the value of 4% for the impurity. Then additionally added a factor of 3% ooverdose for any minute discrepancy caused by either scale, glass equipment and human error. Divided the entire batch by 505mg not 500mg, yes wanted this one pretty bad to be over and not under.

That would would make it 4% overdose with the impurity corrected and 1% error accounted. Which is spot on 500x.04‎ = 20



520mg/ml. Reports states 525 that a head shot.
I Will Reaction GIF by MOODMAN
 
The Test Decaonate came In at 96% purity so I imputed the value of 4% for the impurity. Then additionally added a factor of 3% ooverdose for any minute discrepancy caused by either scale, glass equipment and human error. Divided the entire batch by 505mg not 500mg, yes wanted this one pretty bad to be over and not under.

That would would make it 4% overdose with the impurity corrected and 1% error accounted. Which is spot on 500x.04‎ = 20



520mg/ml. Reports states 525 that a head shot.
IMG_8703.gif

Great work Pench, as usual.
 

Sponsors

Latest posts

Back
Top