OEP LABS Domestic

I absolutely love Ment in both variations but it is easier to acquire the short ester obviously. You can check my history when I was a member to validate that statement. So guess I'm a little bias to it. Imagine if I was that way with PrimoE heck it already be on the list lol. jk!

It is true i have thing for Trestolone, I'll relax on it though, however you'd be surprised the amount folks who also love it but don't say much. Like a secret cult, we will keep it quiet though not wreck the parry ;) All Good I got you fellas
My curiosity is gonna win this battle, I’ll report back if I love or hate it haha
 
there is nothing odd in my opinion, the ment ace especially is super clean. the TD gcms is expected to be like that with a purity of 85% (if i remember correctly)
going to try not to confuse you

That's thing Samp about 1-2 pages back i posted a report states approx.. 64 percent or so on part on part 1/4 of this TD Batch. Now I took the sample from the melted parted of the TD thinking it be the same from overall. From my understanding it is not though. Jano had told it shouldn't melt okay the previous sample that's tested 84% i took from the hardened heart of the center. It also had several melted areas.

Prior to receiving that report, new TD material landed. So the small 1/4 size was combined with the larger TD that landed. Then Compounded using previous history reports then sent to Jano as finished oil for screening GCMS for anything harmful or that should not be there so to speak.

After viewing the GCMS reports it almost appears Batch 2 looks cleaner than Batch 1 in regards to impurities. However not an expert on those reports more why tagged you and photon for guidance.
 
What is your calculated purity for TD 500 batch 2? Did you assume 85% and do a 5% overdose? If you used 1.2x raws and it tested at 550mg/ml, there is no way the purity is only 65%.
 
going to try not to confuse you

That's thing Samp about 1-2 pages back i posted a report states approx.. 64 percent or so on part on part 1/4 of this TD Batch. Now I took the sample from the melted parted of the TD thinking it be the same from overall. From my understanding it is not though. Jano had told it shouldn't melt okay the previous sample that's tested 84% i took from the hardened heart of the center. It also had several melted areas.

Prior to receiving that report, new TD material landed. So the small 1/4 size was combined with the larger TD that landed. Then Compounded using previous history reports then sent to Jano as finished oil for screening GCMS for anything harmful or that should not be there so to speak.

After viewing the GCMS reports it almost appears Batch 2 looks cleaner than Batch 1 in regards to impurities. However not an expert on those reports more why tagged you and photon for guidance.
I’m guessing the sample that tested at 64% was not homogenized. Not an expert, but I don’t see anything concerning on the finished oil GCMS.
 
Back
Top