PHARMACOM Jano test results

Isn’t all this shit from .LTD and henceforth fucking fake. .com is legit i dont know how this hasn’t been mentioned
 
Pharmacom isn’t reliable anymore unfortunately I believe, just saw a report on the Test 300 on telegram that came back as sustanon.. all previous tests on pharmacom has came back on spot before. Hard to believe it’s a fake product
Isn’t all this shit from .LTD and henceforth fucking fake. .com is legit i dont know how this hasn’t been mentioned
Fake counterfeits. Good eye and catch @Nick_Vaz, you're correct.

I was done visiting this thread but someone mentioned to me that people are showing results for fake products now, so I wanted to comment about it to help everyone be more aware.

Zoom in really close on the product photo, look at the product label -- it is from a known fake scam site with the pharmacomlabs.ltd address printed on the product, not the genuine pharmacomlabs.com site.

Unfortunately, it may not always be so easy to identify fakes, but this counterfeit brand put their fake website address so people will check the fake verification code on their fake website.
A lot of fakes may not be this easy to catch, so be careful.
Some of the results you find and share are from counterfeits, not genuine products.

Please see the post linked below for some examples of the known fakes and scammers.


Here are some of the authenticity protections that can help



And, you can check if a source is an official authorized seller or not at the link in the code box below.
Code:
https://pharmacomlabs.com/dealers

Be careful because some of the fakes and scams may be dangerous (I've heard of some having toxic chemicals and/or dangerous drugs in the counterfeits).
I hope this information helps everyone be safe.
 
Last edited:
If we could keep this to legitimate testing. Don't post anything that isn't validated/confirmed as legitimate.

If you see something on this topic verify it first.

@YiL thanks for posting the social info. I literally don't have any social. Reason I asked for proof. Appreciate you.
 
  • Like
Reactions: YiL
Fake counterfeits. Good eye and catch @Nick_Vaz, you're correct.

I was done visiting this thread but someone mentioned to me that people are showing results for fake products now, so I wanted to comment about it to help everyone be more aware.

Zoom in really close on the product photo, look at the product label -- it is from a known fake scam site with the pharmacomlabs.ltd address printed on the product, not the genuine pharmacomlabs.com site.

Unfortunately, it may not always be so easy to identify fakes, but this counterfeit brand put their fake website address so people will check the fake verification code on their fake website.
A lot of fakes may not be this easy to catch, so be careful.
Some of the results you find and share are from counterfeits, not genuine products.

Please see the post linked below for some examples of the known fakes and scammers.


Here are some of the authenticity protections that can help



And, you can check if a source is an official authorized seller or not at the link in the code box below.
Code:
https://pharmacomlabs.com/dealers

Be careful because some of the fakes and scams may be dangerous (I've heard of some having toxic chemicals and/or dangerous drugs in the counterfeits).
I hope this information helps everyone be safe.


This is what I was concerned with, posting nonsense and misleading as a knee jerk reaction to anything outside this forum base.

As far as I'm concerned anything outside Meso should not be included in this ongoing topic. The testing criteria was covered within this community and should stay here untainted by outside BS.
 
All products were pulled from the original vial with a separate, previously unopened and unused needle. Each sample was then placed into a separate previously unopened, unused sterile vial. Each sample was clearly labeled. The entire process is on video. Here are stills from that video.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_7121.webp
    IMG_7121.webp
    72.8 KB · Views: 33
  • IMG_7122.webp
    IMG_7122.webp
    76.9 KB · Views: 22
  • IMG_7127.webp
    IMG_7127.webp
    66.8 KB · Views: 22
  • IMG_7125.webp
    IMG_7125.webp
    81.8 KB · Views: 22
  • IMG_7126.webp
    IMG_7126.webp
    118.7 KB · Views: 20
  • IMG_7123.webp
    IMG_7123.webp
    91.5 KB · Views: 20
Here is my problem. So many conflicts between janoshik and other labs and constantly only his results differ yet we use him to self validate. This is not analytical thinking it is flat out cult like following and not science. Outside validation needs to be done because discrepancies could hurt all of us and when my products end up in question I want an accurate assessment not blind faith.
 
Here is my problem. So many conflicts between janoshik and other labs and constantly only his results differ yet we use him to self validate. This is not analytical thinking it is flat out cult like following and not science. Outside validation needs to be done because discrepancies could hurt all of us and when my products end up in question I want an accurate assessment not blind faith.

You will understand when you start testing your raws and gear..
 
All products were pulled from the original vial with a separate, previously unopened and unused needle. Each sample was then placed into a separate previously unopened, unused sterile vial. Each sample was clearly labeled. The entire process is on video. Here are stills from that video.
Nice :) I'm glad these samples gave better results .

Boldenone = 268.94 / 300 = .90%
Nandrolone = 291.08 / 300 = 97%

Both are passes this time, within the widely accepted +/- 10% of label claim. This is good to see.

Thanks again for getting testing.
 

Sponsors

Latest posts

Back
Top