What in the hell will a different vial being sent to SIMEC tell us in an instance Like this? Let's be really blunt here. The vial in question is the problem, not another one. I'm all for SIMEC testing, but to test another vial won't tell us anything about the sub par number in this case. Again, this is just my opinion. Seven brought up a good point and he was out about 60 hours, but this is a long ester and at his dose, assuming he didn't miss any and pinned that dose every time shouldn't get a number this low.
There are scammers true, but at what point do we support our members and at when do we as a community draw the line with a UGL who has had this happen more than once, bad GH, bad tests from SIMEC on other gear, etc... Sure, there is more good tests than bad, but I just can't support a UGL with their track record and history of treating their customers like they don't know anything.
@biggerben69 states a great point as well. Batch numbers and exp dates really mean nothing. We're not saying every vial is bad and if we found an underdosed vial, we all know the rest of that "batch" will still be sold.
I just hope more people read this thread and whatever the outcome is to better educate themselves. Does the OP continue to run this vial, up the dose, get testing done in the 36-48 hour window, IDK. That's his call and I wish him luck.