Translation - “I have nothing to say”
Alright bud you haven't responded with a single logically consistent argument. In fact you have spouted vibes and insults alone. let's start with your first response to me
Oh- “live by the sword and die by the sword” is certainly not mocking and laughing. I myself said FAFO.
I'll prove you're a dipshit mathematically. You ever take symbolic logic in college? I hope so otherwise you might have some trouble with this one.
let A = an assassination
let R = the utterance “live by the sword dye by the sword”
predicates:
Ass(x) assassination
Death(x) death
Violent(x) violent
Resp(y,x) y is a response to x
Deserve(y,x) y implies x was deserved
Min(y,x) y minimizes the gravity of x
Mock(y,x) y is mockery of x
axioms / background norms (yes norms still count as premises)
- ∀x (Ass(x) → Death(x) ∧ Violent(x))
- ∀y∀x ((Resp(y,x) ∧ Violent(x) ∧ Deserve(y,x)) → Min(y,x))
- ∀y∀x ((Min(y,x) ∧ Death(x)) → Mock(y,x))
facts about the case
- Ass(A)
- Resp(R,A)
- Deserve(R,A) (that proverb assigns causal blame)
derivation
from 1 and 4: Death(A) ∧ Violent(A)
from 2 5 6 and Violent(A): Min(R,A)
from 3 Min(R,A) and Death(A): Mock(R,A)
therefore,
Mock(R,A)
QED
shall we move onto your next claim or do you have any issues with my predicates, normative linguistic rules or the derivation itself?