Photon
Member
See my wording above. I said dissolution batch size.
Yea i missed out on that, by bad.
(I think it depends on what he's brewing imo -- raws availability mostly)
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
See my wording above. I said dissolution batch size.
I injected oils from Mexico in 1988 and didn’t die! Came wrapped up in a magazine with rubber bands wrapping it together. I have down far worse!Definately sounds like some of you guys “take all comers” for sure…
I injected oils from Mexico in 1988 and didn’t die! Came wrapped up in a magazine with rubber bands wrapping it together. I have down far worse!Definately sounds like some of you guys “take all comers” for sure…
Could have 5 one liter "batches" thrown in one pot or just one 5 liter pot. What we are trying to determine is mix/max/mean batch volumes for a given batch number that share a common API concentration. (Each vial in that batch shares common concentration since it came from same solution).Yea i missed out on that, by bad.
(I think it depends on what he's brewing imo -- raws availability mostly)
I'm probably missing something but couldn't the overall average look good but still have one hot or under-dosed vial? Just seems inaccurate.If your average is gtg then all vials are gtg. If your average is not then mix all in a 100ml vial and dispense to smaller vials, to get the average.
NPP200 = P10You're a hero. Are the batches?:
Mast P200 - 001/P10? - Edit: Op Confirmed it's P11
NPP200 - P11? If so, your test is the first jano of this batch that i've seen
For reference @TallandSmall also tested NPP200 P10 and aligns with your result Janoshik AnalyticalNPP200 = P10
Is that the syndrome you're speaking of?I have down far worse!
Moving forward, this is something that we should be asking of all vendors, along with evidence for it, ie an appropriate sized media bottle.Could have 5 one liter "batches" thrown in one pot or just one 5 liter pot. What we are trying to determine is mix/max/mean batch volumes for a given batch number that share a common API concentration. (Each vial in that batch shares common concentration since it came from same solution).
I'm probably missing something but couldn't the overall average look good but still have one hot or under-dosed vial? Just seems inaccurate.
I injected oils from Mexico in 1988 and didn’t die! Came wrapped up in a magazine with rubber bands wrapping it together. I have down far worse!
Along with enforced standards on batch numbers, it would clear up any uncertainty on an issue like we saw above. Every vial with common batch number would share common concentration since it came from same homogeneous mixture (solution).Moving forward, this is something that we should be asking of all vendors, along with evidence for it, ie an appropriate sized media bottle.
I never smuggled one in my prison pocket, but I definitely brought plenty back.I keep telling guys who say “raws can be made in US…” or wherever, the old timers wouldn’t have been driving to Mexico smuggling vials in their prison pockets if it was that easy!
I never smuggled one in my prison pocket, but I definitely brought plenty back.
One 1 L vial?I assumed one would be the max
That would be a good thread. Constraints on US UG API (aka raw) production.I keep telling guys who say “raws can be made in US…” or wherever, the old timers wouldn’t have been driving to Mexico smuggling vials in their prison pockets if it was that easy!
There's few guys on here that seem like they could make a whole kit disappear. Definitely no harm reduction on that pack mule.I assumed one would be the max, but I guess I underestimated how many seasoned pros could stash up there…
Constraints on prison pocket smuggling: an experts opinion.That would be a good thread. Constraints on US UG API (aka raw) production.
There's few guys on here that seem like they could make a whole kit disappear. Definitely no harm reduction on that pack mule.
