MESO-Rx Sponsor Primal Pharma - US Domestic

Primo 100 that tested at 103%, GCMS results:

From what I know the results are good, but let’s have the more experienced bros on this have a look.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_4018.webp
    IMG_4018.webp
    58.9 KB · Views: 148
  • IMG_4019.webp
    IMG_4019.webp
    63.3 KB · Views: 139
  • IMG_4020.webp
    IMG_4020.webp
    67.8 KB · Views: 129
  • IMG_4021.webp
    IMG_4021.webp
    67.5 KB · Views: 108
  • IMG_4022.webp
    IMG_4022.webp
    70.5 KB · Views: 98
  • IMG_4023.webp
    IMG_4023.webp
    53.1 KB · Views: 108
Last edited:
His batch was purchased in December on the last restock
Yeah, This was the batch where the raws produced a Primo 100, but the Primo 200 came out as 180 and was discounted. There was only a vendor GCMS of the Primo 200/180 and not a GCMS of the Primo 100 until now

Claimed to have been brewed in Miglyol 812. I don't see anything that contradicts the claim....and now wish i'd got more.

The Primo 200 GCMS shows BB, whilst the Primo 100 one doesn't, both fit Migoyl i think.
 
Last edited:
You’re right about aromatase, and by saying that, you’re also conceding the lower E2.
No I'm not. I'm saying there is no lowering of e2 from primo and you are mistaken. To be clear, regardless of what you think you've see in your own bloodwork.

I will try to explain another way. We call AIs "AIs" because of what they do. We take them to lower e2 bc that action reliably does so. SERMs, a similar arguement.

Primo on the other hand is an androgen. WE don't take androgens to reliably reduce e2 on bloodwork because it doesn't. Otherwise we would cstegorize it by it's reliable additional effect, even if the mechanism was undescribed.

The reliability is the entire issue - it is entriely unreliable... it might not modulate e2 at all and you just dont know how to read the results of your shitty, cheap lab results.

If you want to keep taking it for this purpose, you do you. I'm going to tell everyone else not to use primo for this purpose.
 
Test results from Ment 50 (full vial), black caps, purchased in early-January. On the money at 50.47mg/ml. GCMS is still pending.

View attachment 376190
GCMS results for Primal Ment 50, black caps, purchased early-January.

Oil looks to be pure MCT. Not sure why the trestolone (7α-methyl-19-nortestosterone) is being identified as “Androst-5-en-7-one, 3-(acetyloxy)-, (3.beta.)-”, but it showed up correctly on the original test. @janoshik - What are your thoughts here?

Would love to get input from some of the smarter folks here, but it seems to check out.

1769708918682.webp
 
Last edited:
GCMS results for Primal Ment 50, black caps, purchased early-January.

Oil looks to be pure MCT. Not sure why the trestolone (7α-methyl-19-nortestosterone) is being identified as “Androst-5-en-7-one, 3-(acetyloxy)-, (3.beta.)-”, but it showed up correctly on the original test.

Would love to get input from some of the smarter folks here, but it seems to check out.

View attachment 376479
Andro isn’t Ment for sure. You can email Jano and ask why the HPLC says it was and the GCMS says nope
 
Primo 100 that tested at 103%, GCMS results:

From what I know the results are good, but let’s have the more experienced bros on this have a look.

Weird where's the BA/BB?
Either way, you can compare the yellow stuff and the GCMS in the earlier post i made. Why isn't a sealed vial sent?
1769709974838.webp

 
Weird where's the BA/BB?
Either way, you can compare the yellow stuff and the GCMS in the earlier post i made. Why isn't a sealed vial sent?
View attachment 376494


This was my first time sending to Jano, by the time I read about sending sealed seal vials shit was already halfway to Europa.

Thanks for looking into my results. Exactly the guy I wanted to have take a look lol.
 
Back
Top