MESO-Rx Sponsor Primal Pharma - US Domestic

[jdub1]

You ever considered HCG?

currently doing 1000iu per week throughout cycle, what dosage would you suggest for e2 recovery?

 

[BamaCrazy]

(1) Update? Still planning mid Oct timing?

You want may to consider feedback on what APIs and raws vs oils the customers would like to see (of the 12 tests you pledged). GSO seems to have little support here.

(2) Caps?
(3) Stoppers?

(4) How's the rest of the HPLC testing coming along?

Thank you.

@dinfar1337 example of a vendor who has pledged to raise the bar on surveillance and testing in the UG.

Pure spam. Reported

 

[Photon]

What are the odds? Different vendors.
Not the first report that matches either.

Janoshik Analytical

Janoshik Analytical

 

[newguy2]

Pure spam. Reported

Bro you might be worse at this point sorry. That was a great post holding the source to his word.

 

[Photon]

Pure spam. Reported

To be fair, he did mention 1 month ago about it...
I'd prefer if it was done on more expensive compounds tho..like MastP200.

MESO-Rx Sponsor Post in thread 'Primal Pharma - US Domestic'

Sep 7, 2025

What products are you planning to send for GCMS?

Any suggestions? We were thinking:

Test E 250 (once it's back)
Test Cyp 200 (once it's back)
Test P 100
Sustanon 250
Mast P 100
Tren Ace 100
Tren E 200
Deca 200
NPP 100
EQ 300 (once it's back)

We pledged 12 GCMS tests. Need to add 2 more.

• Primal_Pharma

• 
• 

MESO-Rx Sponsor Post in thread 'Primal Pharma - US Domestic'

Sep 25, 2025

When are you sending in the vials for GCMS?

Cyp and Tren Ace is landing early October so we are planning to send them in mid October

• Primal_Pharma

• 

 

[readalot]

We pledged 12 GCMS tests. Need to add 2 more.

My bad. Yes, 14 GCMS tests pledged. Not 12.

Thanks for clarifying @Photon

 

[Dial It In]

currently doing 1000iu per week throughout cycle, what dosage would you suggest for e2 recovery?

Make yourself a quick thread on this and we can move that over and discuss with the group.

 

[Photon]

do you guys prefer dbol or test prop to recover crashed e2 from eq? which one works faster? I’m leaning towards test prop because I believe it will be more predictable and im kinda nervous to just throw in some dbol into this cycle with heavy progesterone activity from tren, this is also during a cut so I don’t want to look like a water buffalo for the next couple weeks. But if I can improve symptoms overnight with dbol I am willing to take that risk, I’ll just take some nolva ralox and take my caber dose a day early

dbol is probably the quickest, it converts to methyl e2 which i believe also stays longer in your system. only problem is this doesn't show up in e2 bloodwork so you have no idea if it's too high or low.

 

[BamaCrazy]

To be fair, he did mention 1 month ago about it...
I'd prefer if it was done on more expensive compounds tho..like MastP200.

MESO-Rx Sponsor Post in thread 'Primal Pharma - US Domestic'

Sep 7, 2025

What products are you planning to send for GCMS?

Any suggestions? We were thinking:

Test E 250 (once it's back)
Test Cyp 200 (once it's back)
Test P 100
Sustanon 250
Mast P 100
Tren Ace 100
Tren E 200
Deca 200
NPP 100
EQ 300 (once it's back)

We pledged 12 GCMS tests. Need to add 2 more.

• Primal_Pharma

• 
• 

MESO-Rx Sponsor Post in thread 'Primal Pharma - US Domestic'

Sep 25, 2025

When are you sending in the vials for GCMS?

Cyp and Tren Ace is landing early October so we are planning to send them in mid October

• Primal_Pharma

• 

Understood. A simple one liner post asking whether Primal is still going to support Readalot’s projects (even though he isn’t under no obligation to do so) is sufficient. But even that usually turns into spam if he doesn’t get the answer he wants.

 

[BamaCrazy]

dbol is probably the quickest, it converts to methyl e2 which i believe also stays longer in your system. only problem is this doesn't show up in e2 bloodwork so you have no idea if it's too high or low.

I find the Dbol solution unpredictable for the reason you mentioned. DHEA didn’t help me at all. HCG did but I felt off when using it. But it is an option. But not a quick solution like Dbol is.

 

[readalot]

whether Primal is still going to support Readalot’s projects

Misinformation.

Raising analytical testing standards on the UG is not my pet project. It is the essence of why this forum exists and what separates it from the rest. I definitely do support that mission. It is needed now more than ever with current API situation.

At this point you have two options. The report link and the ignore feature. OK, maybe three options.

 

[Dial It In]

What are the odds?
Not the first report that matches either.

View attachment 352778View attachment 352780

Janoshik Analytical

Janoshik Analytical

Is that a new purchase since the 25th when it was stated they were tossing batches? Or just more of the same showing the inconsistency?

 

[Photon]

Is that a new purchase since the 25th when it was stated they were tossing batches? Or just more of the same showing the inconsistency?

It's different vendors.

 

[Dial It In]

It's different vendors.

Oh I see the that now. Hmmmmmmm

 

[abz94]

Thanks for sending them off. Lucky in this case it was a labeling error on the lower dose. Imagine thinking you had 25s and taking 4x100.

thats a copout man not a labeling error lol. its just underdosed.

 

[BamaCrazy]

Misinformation.

Raising analytical testing standards on the UG is not my pet project. It is the essence of why this forum exists and what separates it from the rest. I definitely do support that mission. It is needed now more than ever with current API situation.

At this point you have two options. The report link and the ignore feature. OK, maybe three options.

Don’t worry about me. Just move your testing to the testing thread where it belongs. You are acting like a child who cannot always get his way. The forum was much better in your absence

 

[readalot]

Just move your testing

It is not my testing.

It is testing the vendor agreed to as part of their claimed goal to raise UG analytical standards (a key component of their marketing strategy).

 

[BamaCrazy]

It is not my testing.

It is testing the vendor agreed to as part of their claimed goal to raise UG analytical standards (a key component of their marketing strategy).

To feed your models. Most of that is unnecessary and usually leads nowhere. So yes, it’s yours.

 

[readalot]

To feed your models. Most of that is unnecessary and usually leads nowhere. So yes, it’s yours.

You are clogging up the thread with misinformation.

GCMS testing is quite relevant given current poor raw quality being reported. Any model development is a truly added bonus that @Photon has done a great job on. We are all fortunate to have him here.

 

[BamaCrazy]

You are clogging up the thread with misinformation.

If it doesn’t align with your goals it’s misinformation. lol