I'll reimburse with whatever he wants. I'd like to see sealed vials first but regardless, I'll make it right like I always do. But he didn't want to use us anymore so I respect that.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I'll reimburse with whatever he wants. I'd like to see sealed vials first but regardless, I'll make it right like I always do. But he didn't want to use us anymore so I respect that.
Pictures?I'll reimburse with whatever he wants. I'd like to see sealed vials first but regardless, I'll make it right like I always do. But he didn't want to use us anymore so I respect that.
I'll reimburse with whatever he wants. I'd like to see sealed vials first but regardless, I'll make it right like I always do. But he didn't want to use us anymore so I respect that.

DM me brotherI can’t tell if this is directed to me or not. I don’t know if I said I wasn’t going to use you guys anymore. I have gotten a few things tested of yours and shared it. Usually just trying to help. I do have a few of the TU it’s P10 I thinkView attachment 373671
You have different colored test u. Probably not all from “p10” lolI can’t tell if this is directed to me or not. I don’t know if I said I wasn’t going to use you guys anymore. I have gotten a few things tested of yours and shared it. Usually just trying to help. I do have a few of the TU it’s P10 I thinkView attachment 373671
You have different colored test u. Probably not all from “p10” lol
Well. All of them say “p10” anyway.
Well. All of them say “p10” anyway.
You’ve said that like 7 times lolAnd...I'm outa here..
Primal praying it comes true this timeYou’ve said that like 7 times lol
roger that, understood to the maxKind of like this. If a source has the presence of compounds known to be used by Chinese vendors then either the source is using these to brew or they aren’t brewing at all and everything is just a resell. Which would explain a lot of the following. Minimum to zero raw testing (cause anyone can buy raws and mail them), different size bottles per batch, the lack of lab pics, equipment or inventory like the other domestic sources have done, the sales and extras are so cheap because buying direct from china is dirt cheap, different color of same compounds but same “batches”. Also you can’t quality control a lab you don’t control. Or they just use cheap shit in all they do and it’s not what they’re stated they do or going to do. Did the last contamination of test p even get addressed or did we get some rant about awesome sales, personal agendas and setting standards? I know the answer. But cheap shit explains the awesome sales too. Buy, don’t buy don’t care. Like what I’ve said or other members have said about these issues I don’t care. This is our fucking board and our job to vet sources because they pay to be here to offer us a product. We do have say in what we want from a source. You want low cheap quality that’s your choice and I won’t disparage anyone that does. Those that want a higher standard to reduce our risk they shouldn’t be disparaged either. I’m here to increase harm reduction and that’s it. If things turnaround I’ll be the first to say great job. But cheap and risk isn’t a choice I choose for my health in a already risky lifestyle.
lmao , havent seen this username since tgi thread years ago, welcome back or. nice to see ya if youve been active elsewhere in places im notHey there buddy.
This kind of shit really needs to stop with sources.
If I was younger I’d open up shop and put em all out of business. Lol
i think theres another solution here on the table for people; not just those 2 stated....Exactly my point. “In the past”. Well this isn’t meso 7 years ago. This is meso now. You want clean gear stop using bathtub brew or brew your own.
whats wrong w a lil pookie rip pre workoutAre you smoking crack?
could be the lighting...all look relatively similar for the most part, nowhere near diff we saw in eqYou have different colored test u. Probably not all from “p10” lol
Multi quote brother.could be the lighting...all look relatively similar for the most part, nowhere near diff we saw in eq
I'm going to stop visiting this thread, except to repost this daily.
Please direct any new joiners to this post.
Please re-post as necessary as well.
Beware, vendor (1) constantly lies, (2) sells contaminated, (3) under-dosed products which doesn't match vendor's own testing. If purchasing, please do BOTH HPLC and GCMS on products before usage.
(1) Test U 250 - > 3rd party tested as contaminated 200mg/ml. Used same batch numbers, for 2 different brews with different mg/ml.
(2) Primo - Claimed to brew using raws, multiple times, only to be caught reselling China Primo for US Dom prices.
MESO-Rx Sponsor Post in thread 'Primal Pharma - US Domestic'
Was the recent primo underdosed?
There seem to be a great number of people commenting here lately that haven't bothered to get caught up on the series of events that lead to the mistrust many have right now with Primal. Here's a brief breakdown of the events
Primal lied about this Primo's origins not once, but twice. First, it was made from raws they got in that they paid a lot for, and they were "too excited to get it (the raws) tested" and brewed it immediately. Then, days later, they "came clean" and said it was left over primo raws they found while looking through their...
(3) TestC250 -> 3rd party tested, multiple vials under-dosed as 220mg/ml to 230mg/ml. Different brews, different mg/ml, same batch number.
Here are the combined results for the 4 different TC250 P10 (early-September) samples:FYI - I’ve sent in samples from 3 different vials of TC250 P10 (early-September), to put to rest any doubts that my initial test that came in at 220mg was not a one-off, as originally suggested by Primal. Jano has them and I suspect I will have results in a day or two. I am also guessing they’ll all come in around 220.
Full 10ml vial: 220.93 mg/ml
Sample A: 231.73 mg/ml
Sample B: 224.32 mg/ml
Sample C: 220.62 mg/ml
Average: 224.4 mg/ml
Janoshik Analytical
Janoshik Analytical...
(4) MastP200 -> 3rd party tested under-dosed as 153mg/ml.
(5) TRE400 -> 2 different batches, both 3rd party tested to both be contaminated with dissolved brewing equipment.
(6) TC50 -> Female Test Cyp 50, multiple 3rd party testing as 62mg/ml.
(7) Adrol50 -> 3rd party tested as 30mg/ml.
(8) EQ300/EQ500 -> Multiple vials of EQ brewed using different set of raws of different colors using same batch number with only 1 test. Claims to send raws for testing, waited for results, only to admit nothing was sent and that a new batch was coming. (What was actually sold?)
MESO-Rx Sponsor Post in thread 'Primal Pharma - US Domestic'
Hello Mr. Ape @Primal_PharmaI have three vials of Ment. All are black caps, but one is a taller vial than the other two. There is a slight yellow tint to them. I also was going to send a sample off for testing. Since the one vial is a different size, I fell like I need to send off 2 samples, one from each size. I was planning on doing GCMS also, so hope it is compensated.
View attachment 373169
makes sense finally to me, couldn't understand how one batch could have such variations in color and potency.but why not just name them all different batches if this is the case?He confessed at one point that a batch was not actually a batch but multiple batches with the same recipe. So folks were pushing for a bigger flask that could hold one large homogeneous batch. At least that was my understanding.
O god different style of vials? Better toss all of it.Hello Mr. Ape @Primal_Pharma
Why are there two different vile styles with the new hardware?
