They overlap right, but Trininolein and 7-Hexadecenal are both found in Coconut and Palm oils that Migoyl 812 is derived from right? 7-haexadecenal as an oxidation byproduct poossibly from heat in trace amounts (GCMS doesnt quanitfy trace or not as we already discussed), whilst Trininolein is the only C18 found in the ME100, which wouldn't make sense if it contained veg oil (there would be a lot of other compounds).
I feel like im missing something here. How confidently can we say that the presence of Trininolein and 7-Hexadecenal in the ME100 indicates that it contains veg oil or is from china?
I don't see the GCMS as being a perfect report, but inferring it contains veg oil feels a stretch to me (i acknowledge my feeling are irrelevant in the truth of the matter).
I was doing some digging last night, but I couldnt for the life of me find the link Primal had posted to the oil they currently use. Wanted to run some info to see if possibly the mig812 is actually closer to mig818 or a "technical" grade vs. Pharma grade. Does seem like there is an opportunity for something like this to happen from manufacturing if fractionalzing isnt entirely complete/clean. Yes, Pharma grade MIG812 should be refined of all long-chain fatty acids, but seems possible if the mig812 was derived from soy or similar product that the Trininolein could be a by-product.
I doubt thats the case since they have been saying mig812 highest quality mct on the market is what they use, BUT figured couldnt hurt to look to see if the oil company/reseller are kosher as Ive read some sketchy reports.
Mig is iv approved and has strict requirements on what's in it. You can see the spec sheet.
The vendor has already shown a GCMS of the oil he uses, it's not even the same oil.
What you're basically saying is that this vendor is using palm oil or poorly refined MCT oil, neither of which are pharma or MIG.
There's enough GCMS in this thread, where the vendor was previously using MCT and then switched to MIG, nether of which you would see what is in the primo 100.
What about different type of Mig actually being used? Not saying this was done purposfully or blaming any party, just asking because I am not well versed in these reports and Im not going to take chatgpts word as truth lol
Can some of those veg oil findings be degradation/oxidation? Seems the oils are deteriorating in the gcsm, from the Primo starting to cleave off the ester and turning into Primo base? This is why I was thinking maybe the oil is technical grade but maybe marked as pharma? Maybe the oil is older, over heated, turning rancid, or derived from veg oil orginally (palm ect) or just improperly stored (wether at manufacturer, shipping or brewing).
It is odd. I wonder if its possible to ask Jano to run the sample again with a different tech.
Are you thinking the actual report comes out from the analyzer the same and the tech edit out the "ignore peaks 1,3,5 ect" and wrong auto-ids for better visibility? Or do you think the report comes out differently from the analyzer depending on who runs the test? Thats a whole other can of worms to tackle.. id assume one of the techs isnt following the SOP exactly, while one is?
Not sure what I would prefer... unedited, all raw information OR an easier to read "cleaned up" list. Would think scientifically theyd want to post unedited raw results so they dont get accussed of messing with data, but its also nice to see that clean and easily legible report.
