Athleticfreak
Member
I’m just fine, you’re the one who made the “attention seeking is unreal” comment.
Just cause you get oils from China doesn’t mean you have to call us “dear” like they do lol.
MESO-Rx
Anabolic Steroids
MESO-Rx Sponsor Primal Pharma - US Domestic
- Thread starter Primal_Pharma
- Start date
-
- Tags
- primal
Just cause you get oils from China doesn’t mean you have to call us “dear” like they do lol.
Sorry… dear
Is the Test cyp 250 for sale on the web site the same one that third part testing put slightly overdosed and another vial under at around 200 from 250?
crispybacon!
Member
I wouldn’t rely on the COAs on the website. We’ve already seen significant variances in the past. For example, 3rd party testing for Test Cyp 250 “batch” P10 came back at ~220, ~230, ~240, ~250, & ~260mg.
If Primal is actually following through with brewing true batches going forward, 3rd party testing should prove that out. Until then, I’d argue it’s a crap shoot.
Yeah. Dont know why I remember one coming in at like 200. I guess my vials could be anywhere in that range, no way of knowing.
Also a possibility of plastic, TE cross contamination, or Chinese gutter oil.
They're mystery vials at this point.
crispybacon!
Member
One way of knowing - send it in for testing. But just know that if you have more than one vial, they may not be the same concentration - mine weren’t and they were purchased at the same time.
Plastic was just on the tren right?
Yeah I know. ill have to send two.
Cheaper to just buy test elsewhere than to test for blind and contamination.
Who knows. The plastic was only discovered in the Tren because of a customer GCMS. Imagine all the other things that have slipped under the radar without being tested. All those blood tests don't quite cut it in regard to sterility/accuracy.
His morals and sourcing are questionable to say the least.
monster8912
Member
I think it was the test U that had a 200 when it was supposed to be 250.
Athleticfreak
Member
The right thing to do is buy from a different source.
I am mostly just buying peptides from him at this point, that I know are relabeled CN and not brewed in house.
It’s honestly surprising that none of the people still trying to take shots at us even bothered to correct you. The one that came in at 200 was the Test U from months back. The fact that the compound itself was unknown just shows how fast misinformation spreads.
The Cyp sample @crispybacon! submitted that tested at 220 was from the socalled mystery batch, the same one @SwolieGuacamole correctly called out at the time. We stopped using that raw source months ago. Meanwhile, every test that comes back on point gets ignored, and people keep recycling the same old results that we’ve already addressed.
What’s also being ignored is that customer bloodwork showing our products are performing exactly as expected, most cases even better.
But anyways, we’ve since moved to volumetric flasks and fully standardized our batching process. The expectation is that the previous complaints will be resolved. But I’m sure something else will become the next talking point soon lol.
The only reason this “plastic” narrative even exists is because someone sent in two separate items and both showed the same extraneous peak. That’s basic analytical thinking. Let’s think about this long and hard my brother. If there were actually plastic present in the product, you’d expect to see it consistently across multiple independent GCMS runs. But we don’t.
No other GCMS, whether blind or ones we’ve sent in has shown plastic. Not one. Yet somehow we’re supposed to believe a single result outweighs every other clean analysis?
When did you buy your 250 test cyp?
Photon
Member
Theres only 2 products you have that have that much solvents. The SUS500(was it? Don't recall) and the TRE400. Neither of which we have seen any GCMS on.
Similar threads
