MESO-Rx Sponsor Primal Pharma - US Domestic

The tren speg is at it again.

kitty-forman-debra-jo-rupp.gif
Your entire personality is rage bait. Ignore button.
 
Details with @Primal_Pharma have been discussed and agreed in regards to the Community Testing donation and the proposal I made.

1. Giving the recent comment by Primal that he will be implementing raw testing I proposed that the compounds tested will be those brewed off that implementation. This allows primal to be more accurate in dosing. Currently this would be too easy to get a gotcha moment. If this is their way ahead then the challenge should be fair. This may be unpopular but I did present this challenge so it was my decision and it shows I don’t have a personal agenda.

2. I will select the two compounds. Once these new batches are done and we can ID batch numbers I will ask members who have said compounds that I choose.

3. I will reimburse members for the sealed vial they send for testing. Primal will reimburse the member for HPLC and GCMS testing.

4. I will not select the member with products nor will Primal. I would like to ask a few veteran members when the time comes if they would be willing to choose the member or members that have the selected product. This eliminates me or Primal from bias or conspiracy theories. The vet members will be those that have no obvious feelings about Primal. I’ll just look at post history and Primal will have that same opportunity to agree.

5. Once it’s all set the rest plays out. Two compounds come back out of plus or minus variation or the GCMS goes against what they claim is their brew procedures they will donate $1500 to community test fund. What we do need is an agreed +/- tolerance for dosage if we can get some input please.

This is the agreed way. If you had a better way you should’ve presented the challenge. Not going to entertain a back and forth how it should’ve went. Everyone or most know I’m a harsh critic of Primal. I wanted this to be fair and not a stacked deck to make it easy for either. I applaud them for agreeing now we wait for the new implementations and see how it unfolds.
 
Details with @Primal_Pharma have been discussed and agreed in regards to the Community Testing donation and the proposal I made.

1. Giving the recent comment by Primal that he will be implementing raw testing I proposed that the compounds tested will be those brewed off that implementation. This allows primal to be more accurate in dosing. Currently this would be too easy to get a gotcha moment. If this is their way ahead then the challenge should be fair. This may be unpopular but I did present this challenge so it was my decision and it shows I don’t have a personal agenda.

2. I will select the two compounds. Once these new batches are done and we can ID batch numbers I will ask members who have said compounds that I choose.

3. I will reimburse members for the sealed vial they send for testing. Primal will reimburse the member for HPLC and GCMS testing.

4. I will not select the member with products nor will Primal. I would like to ask a few veteran members when the time comes if they would be willing to choose the member or members that have the selected product. This eliminates me or Primal from bias or conspiracy theories. The vet members will be those that have no obvious feelings about Primal. I’ll just look at post history and Primal will have that same opportunity to agree.

5. Once it’s all set the rest plays out. Two compounds come back out of plus or minus variation or the GCMS goes against what they claim is their brew procedures they will donate $1500 to community test fund. What we do need is an agreed +/- tolerance for dosage if we can get some input please.

This is the agreed way. If you had a better way you should’ve presented the challenge. Not going to entertain a back and forth how it should’ve went. Everyone or most know I’m a harsh critic of Primal. I wanted this to be fair and not a stacked deck to make it easy for either. I applaud them for agreeing now we wait for the new implementations and see how it unfolds.
Sounds like a win, however I already know certain people will start picking it apart.nothing that is done is going to make some of these guys happy, its like they just live to complain.
 
Sounds like a win, however I already know certain people will start picking it apart.nothing that is done is going to make some of these guys happy, its like they just live to complain.
Then they can do it their own way separate from mine. But no doubt you are correct. Everyone has had almost the last year to do something like this and didn’t. It’s a win for the community I feel either way. We get money for testing or we get a better brewed product if they stick to it.
 
Details with @Primal_Pharma have been discussed and agreed in regards to the Community Testing donation and the proposal I made.

1. Giving the recent comment by Primal that he will be implementing raw testing I proposed that the compounds tested will be those brewed off that implementation. This allows primal to be more accurate in dosing. Currently this would be too easy to get a gotcha moment. If this is their way ahead then the challenge should be fair. This may be unpopular but I did present this challenge so it was my decision and it shows I don’t have a personal agenda.

2. I will select the two compounds. Once these new batches are done and we can ID batch numbers I will ask members who have said compounds that I choose.

3. I will reimburse members for the sealed vial they send for testing. Primal will reimburse the member for HPLC and GCMS testing.

4. I will not select the member with products nor will Primal. I would like to ask a few veteran members when the time comes if they would be willing to choose the member or members that have the selected product. This eliminates me or Primal from bias or conspiracy theories. The vet members will be those that have no obvious feelings about Primal. I’ll just look at post history and Primal will have that same opportunity to agree.

5. Once it’s all set the rest plays out. Two compounds come back out of plus or minus variation or the GCMS goes against what they claim is their brew procedures they will donate $1500 to community test fund. What we do need is an agreed +/- tolerance for dosage if we can get some input please.

This is the agreed way. If you had a better way you should’ve presented the challenge. Not going to entertain a back and forth how it should’ve went. Everyone or most know I’m a harsh critic of Primal. I wanted this to be fair and not a stacked deck to make it easy for either. I applaud them for agreeing now we wait for the new implementations and see how it unfolds.
Sounds reasonable and good willed. Primal is generous with his testing reimbursements, so I will still send my Primo and Ment to Jano for testing.
 
Are quad injections more prone to PIPs and inflammation? I don't hear a lot of bad infections on glute injections.
Not necessarily. I’ve basically perfected my quad injection. You just can’t go to high or to low on the quad. Basically painless. Also highly recommend ventral glute as well but would use more than 1ml on them
 

Sponsors

Back
Top