Private Lab Test E Labmax

[flenser]

Initially added 2 drops to both. Went back and added 2 more to B after the first pic. I got a little more blue with the extra drops, but really it was pretty good with 2 drops. I received a variety of vials and labels on this order all test e, so I'll post more pics if the results are different with other vials when I open them : )

 

[iintensity]

Is this a private lab or "thee" private lab?

 

[mercury]

I think that you should look for better angle with the UV, hard to see anything.

 

[heady muscle]

Initially added 2 drops to both. Went back and added 2 more to B after the first pic. I got a little more blue with the extra drops, but really it was pretty good with 2 drops. I received a variety of vials and labels on this order all test e, so I'll post more pics if the results are different with other vials when I open them : )

I don't care about anything but those breasts in the censored photo! Test, smish!

 

[MANWHORE]

You gave me an idea

 

[flenser]

I think that you should look for better angle with the UV, hard to see anything.

That's actually a good picture of what it looks like. Yellow/orange on the bottom, blue band on the top. I have yet to test one that looks like the "very high concentration" image on the labmax site.

 

[flenser]

I think I have been in denial lately. I REALLY wanted this to be good gear, but anyone can see it's not. It matches the "very underdosed" image on the LM site pretty well. OK, I ordered 4 20ml vials of t-e. I received 2 20ml vials and 4 10ml vials. There are three different labels. I decided to LM the other two labels this morning...

This one looks good. Nice glow blue and orange with just 2 drops. I have 2 10ml vials of this.

This one is BUNK. Anyone have a different opinion? I have 1 20ml vial and 2 10ml vials of this label.

So of the 80ml I purchased, 20ml looks worth pinning. I guess that's not bad compared to Superior. If you look at the Dec 12 test e I posted, it's pretty obvious I was already in denial. It's not any better than the first test I posted here, and that's the replacement gear! I have 9 10ml vials of that garbage.

I think I'm done. Flenser is getting out of the aas game. No one has a fucking clue what they are doing, and if I keep going as I am it's just a matter of time before I pin something really dangerous. It's not worth the risk. I'm pretty sure there are more rewarding ways to spend my money.

 

[MythotiK]

WTF!!!!!!!!! [emoji35][emoji35][emoji35]

 

[johnnyBALLZ]

I think I'm done. Flenser is getting out of the aas game. No one has a fucking clue what they are doing, and if I keep going as I am it's just a matter of time before I pin something really dangerous. It's not worth the risk. I'm pretty sure there are more rewarding ways to spend my money.

Nooooo!! We can't lose you!!

 

[flenser]

I ran a second LM test on the "bunk" vial. My camera was not handy, so I didn't take a pic. It could be the same as the first vial. I am told that they are identical brews.

The HPLC report on the raws showed 80% testosterone, but there may have been a second ester other than t-e comprising part of that 80%.

I'm going to test the "bunk" vial - pin it for a few weeks and get BW. I'm not big on the 4-5 week theory. I've gotten BW enough to know my levels stabilize at 3 within a few percentage points.

 

[mercury]

The HPLC report on the raws showed 80% testosterone, but there may have been a second ester other than t-e comprising part of that 80%.

here is a report from a good real lab of my test enan sample (not private lab). It is good test enan but it contains trace amounts of test prop and it is fooling labmax.

see a peak at 10 minutes, it is test enan, by looking at the high if you have reference of known sample you can visually estimate the concentration without any math, some bold rough estimate just by looking. By compering the peaks , the height

 

[flenser]

see a peak at 10 minutes, it is test enan, by looking at the high if you have reference of known sample you can visually estimate the concentration without any math, some bold rough estimate just by looking.

Could you walk us through this? I'm guessing you visually sum the non-test ena peaks (minus the standard) and compare them to the test ena peak. Roughly 85%?

 

[mercury]

The machine has to be calibrated and you enter your calibration data and the software will do the math. This is the proper way.

Let's put this way. You buy at pharmacy test enan and you know that it is very close to 250 mg/ml

So you run this and compare both reports, this gives you idea what concentration your unknown sample has.

So the peaks at 10 minutes will be deferent on both reports and the height will correspond to concentration.

 

[flenser]

I get it, thanks.

 

[Voltrader]

@flenser I understand where your coming from and your current mindset.