QSC low purity test decanoate raws

[Ghoul]

gotcha, yeah so I believe I have got 99% your same raw of test D, disappointing.

Homebrewers always seem to point to minimal degradation even over long periods of time. Makes me wonder how this stuff's being stored.

Man, you'd think freezers would be cheap enough in China.

 

[Sampei]

You would know better than I would. The purity numbers for raws that I recall seeing haven't been that high.

Man go check in the Lab test thread, I have posted like 10 different RAWS and 90% were 96+ or 95%.

@Spaceman Spiff has posted lately all RAWS 96+ or 98+

 

[29trt]

Homebrewers always seem to point to minimal degradation even over long periods of time. Makes me wonder how this stuff's being stored.

Man, you'd think freezers would be cheap enough in China.

Nope....they store raws in barrels in unconditioned warehouses...

 

[Ghoul]

That's a lot of degradation if it's all the same stuff. In your opinion do you think if it is all the same batch that the degradation happened from improper storage or something else?

I don't think they're "cutting" them. But sitting around in a hot warehouse? Sure. The "bulk" containers I've seen look like cardboard barrels with unsealed plastic bag liners. I'd think proper storage would be to vacuum pack and throw into a refrigerator or freezer, but I doubt that's happening.

 

[Sampei]

@deadbeef you interested in sharing the cost of an GMCS and see what's in the raw? If it's just degradation or there are strange impurities?

@readalot is that the correct test?

 

[Qingdao Sigma Chemicals]

I've seen different testing purity raws of different products ranging from 90% to 99% and sometimes even lower, from all suppliers including us on some batchs, for all kind of products, including test c, deca, eq, test base, primo, tren a, sildenafil, tadalfil, and plenty of others, and I posted some myself on many occasions.

If you think you're gonna receive always a +98% purity raws even on the most basic common products, or there is some kind of standards/stability/parameter control when it comes to steroid raws, you must be an an inexperimented brewer and a dumbest newbie meso member who haven't done enough reading to see the different testing of raws posted everywhere.

All raws almost used to come from the same places and the same purities you will get them with same frequencies from all kind of suppliers.

The fact that you're bitching about the address and accusing me of stealing because your delivery was unsuccessful, even that the tracking number shows clearly "insufficient address" and my policy has been very clear about the matter, proves the low IQ you have. I'll make sure to send you the shipping label monday, showing you your address exacly how you sent it to us, and you can go fuck yourself after that.

 

[29trt]

No wonder Tracy is in such a hurry to sell those 4 raws ...test d, test p , test pp and test B... They must have bought them last minute from some leftover scrapped from the floor warehouse

 

[Sampei]

I've seen different testing purity raws of different products ranging from 90% to 99% and sometimes even lower, from all suppliers including us on some batchs, for all kind of products, including test c, deca, eq, test base, primo, tren a, sildenafil, tadalfil, and plenty of others, and I posted some myself on many occasions.

If you think you're gonna receive always a +98% purity raws even on the most basic common products, or there is some kind of standards/stability/parameter control when it comes to steroid raws, you must be an an inexperimented brewer and a dumbest newbie meso member who haven't done enough reading to see the different testing of raws posted everywhere.

All raws almost used to come from the same places and the same purities you will get them with same frequencies from all kind of suppliers.

That is fairly incorrect Tracy and you know it. Test RAWS in general test always 96+ or 98+.

Boldenone deca and Anadrol are the one testing low 90% on average.

This is the first time I saw a lab test of testosterone raw with a purity same as boldenone or deca.

Just say that you ain't giving a shit and that's ok but don't try to bullshit us saying it's something that happens normally. Test RAWS at 90%? Lol that's a lemon, that's what it is.

 

[Ghoul]

This is what some researchers found when they did GCMS of UGL oils. Pointed to all kinds of "extra" crap in the raws as the most likely source of contamination.



Meanwhile Pfizer boasts of how they make steroid raws in a factory in the middle of US farm country, using techniques and ingredients that are practically organic food grade.

Testosterone API | Testosterone Steroid API | Testosterone API Manufacturer

Pfizer CentreOne are manufactures of Testosterone APIs in a variety of chemistries such as steroid salts and steroid esters.

www.pfizercentreone.com

Those raws are what really separates pharma from UGL.

The problem with testing in our community is that it's been so hyper fixated on not getting "bunk", that "purity" does not carry the meaning most of us associate with it, rather, just a guarantee of active ingredient being present.

 

[Qingdao Sigma Chemicals]

No wonder Tracy is in such a hurry to sell those 4 raws ...test d, test p , test pp and test B... They must have bought them last minute from some leftover scrapped from the floor warehouse

The discount was way before the testing results, and it's because we had a large stock we could empty faster for a such low demanded products, compared to test C or test E.
If you've seen the test PP finished product testing result, you might think twice before saying this crap.

 

[deadbeef]

I've seen different testing purity raws of different products ranging from 90% to 99% and sometimes even lower, from all suppliers including us on some batchs, for all kind of products, including test c, deca, eq, test base, primo, tren a, sildenafil, tadalfil, and plenty of others, and I posted some myself on many occasions.

If you think you're gonna receive always a +98% purity raws even on the most basic common products, or there is some kind of standards/stability/parameter control when it comes to steroid raws, you must be an an inexperimented brewer and a dumbest newbie meso member who haven't done enough reading to see the different testing of raws posted everywhere.

All raws almost used to come from the same places and the same purities you will get them with same frequencies from all kind of suppliers.

The fact that you're bitching about the address and accusing me of stealing because your delivery was unsuccessful, even that the tracking number shows clearly "insufficient address" and my policy has been very clear about the matter, proves the low IQ you have. I'll make sure to send you the shipping label monday, showing you your address exacly how you sent it to us, and you can go fuck yourself after that.

Let’s simplify this to what you’re actually saying: no one should expect to receive high quality raws from QSC.

Hey dummy, you can literally verify the address is correct in the email order. There is nothing to misinterpret here. You and I both know you’ve sent many orders to that address. If you don’t reship it you’re a low life THIEF.

 

[deadbeef]

@deadbeef you interested in sharing the cost of an GMCS and see what's in the raw? If it's just degradation or there are strange impurities?

@readalot is that the correct test?

Let’s do it.

 

[Sampei]

This is what some researchers found when they did GCMS of UGL oils. Pointed to all kinds of "extra" crap in the raws as the most likely source of contamination.

View attachment 309286

Meanwhile Pfizer boasts of how they make steroid raws in a factory in the middle of US farm country, using techniques and ingredients that are practically organic food grade.

Testosterone API | Testosterone Steroid API | Testosterone API Manufacturer

Pfizer CentreOne are manufactures of Testosterone APIs in a variety of chemistries such as steroid salts and steroid esters.

www.pfizercentreone.com

Those raws are what really separates pharma from UGL.

The problem with testing in our community is that it's been so hyper fixated on not getting "bunk", that "purity" does not carry the meaning most of us associate with it, rather, just a guarantee of active ingredient being present.

Yeah too bad Pfizer don't sell those RAWS xD

 

[Sampei]

Let’s do it.

I'll PM you, if anyone is interested in chip in let me know

 

[readalot]

@deadbeef you interested in sharing the cost of an GMCS and see what's in the raw? If it's just degradation or there are strange impurities?

@readalot is that the correct test?

GCMS. Yes.

Poor purity.

Widespread surveillance of raws by GCMS should be openly embraced by the community.

In addition, the answer to the -ene question is an important one.

 

[Ghoul]

Yeah too bad Pfizer don't sell those RAWS xD

I'll bet they'll export them to some licensed entity....just like their rHGH pens, which get resold into the market. One can dream.

May finally be a good reason to get a damn prescription.

 

[Spaceman Spiff]

including test c, deca, eq, test base, primo, tren a, sildenafil, tadalfil, and plenty of others, and I posted some myself on many occasions

I haven't had any of the main anabolics come from you with that low of purity. Always been solid

@egruberman
@29trt

96%+ for the following
Test c
Test P
Test U
Test E
Npp
Tren a
Tren e
Sustanon
Anavar
Anadrol
Mast e
Primo e
Mast p
Winnie
Dbol
Cialis

Acceptable sub 96
Deca 93%
eQ 91%

It has also been this high for @BST-rawspharma



People should still test their shit.

 

[Sampei]

I haven't had any of the main anabolics come from you with that low of purity. Always been solid

96%+ for the following
Test c
Test P
Test U
Test E
Npp
Tren a
Tren e
Sustanon
Anavar
Anadrol
Mast e
Primo e
Mast p
Winnie
Dbol
Cialis

Acceptable sub 96
Deca 93%
eQ 91%

Exactly!

 

[readalot]

Maybe even worse than most appreciate:

Post in thread 'Janoshik Analytical laboratory testing services'

Nov 21, 2024

Given the standard had arrived on ice and was tested the same day it had arrived ( 20 kilo box for one such tiny vial! ) I would conclude that those are either false positives caused by the high temperature environment of the GC or that there's nothing that can be done about that if they can't get rid of it in CRM.

However much I'd love to charge more than double for all API tests, based on this particular anecdote of a test it seems that this is not a cause of concern.

Thanks for your reply. Respectfully, the difference between HPLC purity and GCMS purity (approximate via area...

• readalot

• 

 

[Dirthand]

On December 3red order a considerable amount as well sure it all the same batch.