QSC raw Testo D / Bolde U - Jano

[Sampei]

Results came back of the latest RAWS bought before the Christmas promo, it was the raw promo.

Surprised of the test D result... It's not the shitty 90% purity.

A bit bummed out of the bolde U purity

What do you think guys? GMCS on the bolde U?

 

[Spaceman Spiff]

What do you think guys? GMCS on the bolde U?

What will it accomplish?

I think its a waste of money unless you want to Data Collect.

 

[Sampei]

What will it accomplish?

I think its a waste of money unless you want to Data Collect.

Would you use this bolde U raw for yourself?

 

[Musmadar]

Would you use this bolde U raw for yourself?

Hard question to answer !

 

[Spaceman Spiff]

Would you use this bolde U raw for yourself?

yes. 100%

 

[Spaceman Spiff]

Post in thread 'Dynamite Raws (International & US Domestic)'

Jul 12, 2020

What’s the difference between the 2.95Kg of bu and the 2kg of bu new batch. Is it just listed twice? Was there an issue with the last batch that would require ya to let people know it’s a new batch? Only wondering cuz I’m running the last batch right now lol.

Second question, I did not see primo e on current stock or coming soon, any timeframe on that?

thanks buddy!

Good question, I forgot to explain this a while back - comparatively (to every current source providing EW) there is no issue with my old EQ stock - however it is not ideal. I'm sure the community knows (or atleast...

• ExtremePIP

• 

click the link and scroll down

 

[Sampei]

Post in thread 'Dynamite Raws (International & US Domestic)'

Jul 12, 2020

What’s the difference between the 2.95Kg of bu and the 2kg of bu new batch. Is it just listed twice? Was there an issue with the last batch that would require ya to let people know it’s a new batch? Only wondering cuz I’m running the last batch right now lol.

Second question, I did not see primo e on current stock or coming soon, any timeframe on that?

thanks buddy!

Good question, I forgot to explain this a while back - comparatively (to every current source providing EW) there is no issue with my old EQ stock - however it is not ideal. I'm sure the community knows (or atleast...

• ExtremePIP

• 

click the link and scroll down

Interesting thanks Spiff.

So we could have vegetable oil in these BU RAWS? If I have understood it correctly. That's crazy xD

Another funny thing: 83% purity was highest BU raw purity at that time lol

 

[Spaceman Spiff]

Interesting thanks Spiff.

So we could have vegetable oil in these BU RAWS? If I have understood it correctly. That's crazy xD

Another funny thing: 83% purity was highest BU raw purity at that time lol

Ultimately you dont have to use any of them until you find a 96% pure one.

I don't know any seller who would refund for that quality. You can ask to gcms it for extra. I personally wouldn't unless it was something like 2 kilos

 

[Sampei]

Ultimately you dont have to use any of them until you find a 96% pure one.

I don't know any seller who would refund for that quality. You can ask to gcms it for extra. I personally wouldn't unless it was something like 2 kilos

It's 1kg hahaha

96% EQ is bad, can't hold high concentration, Tracy said that multiple times.

 

[29trt]

Is test D hygroscopic like anadrol raws?

 

[Sampei]

Is test D hygroscopic like anadrol raws?

I have no idea, I sent my sample with a silica pack with the raw sample.

 

[29trt]

I have no idea, I sent my sample with a silica pack with the raw sample.

Hmmm..thats interesting... Wonder if the other guy sent it with silica if not that would maybe explain the lower "purity" if indeed it absorbs moisture...

 

[Sampei]

Hmmm..thats interesting... Wonder if the other guy sent it with silica if not that would maybe explain the lower "purity" if indeed it absorbs moisture...

I sent my first batch of test D without any silica packet and got a 96%, but this time Tracy (he was going to fund part of the test, sadly he disappeared before he could ahaha) asked me to send it with a silica packet just to eliminate any variables. So I did.

 

[29trt]

The first one was not from the last promo right?

I've searched online and it seems all test esters are hygroscopic short esters a bit more than long esters. Which lines up with the general consensus that you need to store them with dessicant.
And it stands to reason that during winter it will have higher moisture content if no precaution are taken for the sample tested...

 

[29trt]

I might have to rethink my theory as it seems moisture absorbtion is low about 0.1% per year in 70% relative air humidity .
It might lead to degradation of the raw but how much is anyone's guess

 

[Sampei]

The first one was not from the last promo right?

I've searched online and it seems all test esters are hygroscopic short esters a bit more than long esters. Which lines up with the general consensus that you need to store them with dessicant.
And it stands to reason that during winter it will have higher moisture content if no precaution are taken for the sample tested...

My first batch was not from QSC at all and not from any promo and well before the latest RAWS promo QSC was launching.

 

[Sampei]

Sadly it's mostly just a lottery with these RAWS. Now it's even worse, like way worse. Any shit produced or that they can put their hands on get sold

 

[AlexDavis43]

Post in thread 'Dynamite Raws (International & US Domestic)'

Jul 12, 2020

What’s the difference between the 2.95Kg of bu and the 2kg of bu new batch. Is it just listed twice? Was there an issue with the last batch that would require ya to let people know it’s a new batch? Only wondering cuz I’m running the last batch right now lol.

Second question, I did not see primo e on current stock or coming soon, any timeframe on that?

thanks buddy!

Good question, I forgot to explain this a while back - comparatively (to every current source providing EW) there is no issue with my old EQ stock - however it is not ideal. I'm sure the community knows (or atleast...

• ExtremePIP

• 

click the link and scroll down

For example, trying to find out what the other 2% is in a raw that tested at 98% purity. Is this just done out of curiosity &/or for "data collection?" Or, how is it harm reduction?

 

[Spaceman Spiff]

For example, trying to find out what the other 2% is in a raw that tested at 98% purity. Is this just done out of curiosity &/or for "data collection?" Or, how is it harm reduction?

it would be good for data collection.

there will always be impurities. Ultimately, what can we do about it?

 

[Sampei]

For example, trying to find out what the other 2% is in a raw that tested at 98% purity. Is this just done out of curiosity &/or for "data collection?" Or, how is it harm reduction?

No one proposed to test a raw that is 98% tho. So I'm not following your question