Question for Bill, and other knowledged gentlemen

GeorgeWBush

New Member
Well, question isn't exactly correct as it is questions plural, however I have been curious about a few things and haven't been able to find answers.

1. Use of anti-androgens concurrent with use of AAS

I know that many steroid compounds, orals mainly, exhibit their effects on cells through pathways other than the androgen receptor due to their characteristic of having a poor binding affinity. Specifically though, I am wondering why then if this is true, that many oral compounds (and some injectables, ie 'deca') aren't employed with the concurrent usage of anti-androgens alongside as the user would reap a large portion of the steroids anabolic properties while avoiding a large portion of a steroids androgenic side effects? I could see this being particularly advantageous for women who would like to use higher dosages of anabolics, like anavar, without increasing the risk of virilization.

1a. In the same vein, I further wonder why 5-alpha reductase drugs aren't employed in women who use various esters of testosterone? The only risks I am aware of, with women using such drugs as finasteride or dutasteride, is if they are pregnant with a male fetus, and the lack of 5-ar enzymes will interfere with the fetus's development of male characteristics.

2. Oral steroids in injectable solution
I have mainly 2 questions in regard to this: firstly, I am wondering if the solution used to suspend/dissolve the steroid effects the absorption time of the steroid to a significant degree. I've read that the body can absorb the BA/BB faster than carrier oils and that occurrence can cause post injection "crashing" as a result in highly concentrated steroid solutions. So, I wonder even if a carrier oil such as EO is used and the absorption of the oil is very slow, will that effect the time for the hormone to be absorbed, at least to a significant degree? I've read many anecdotal reports that orals suspended in oils take longer to "feel" similarly with test-suspension versus test in oil.

2a. Second question, is there any evidence to suggest that injecting a steroid rather than ingesting it will cause the hormone (assuming equal amounts absorbed in both cases) to be less hepatotoxic? It seems logical that if the hormone can circulate through the body, through muscles and through the various other regions where the hormone can attach, before it reaches the liver, that it would have a higher ratio of anabolism to hepatotoxicity compared to oral ingestion. However, I am basing this merely on conjecture so I defer the question to people with bigger brains than I.

3. Bill, I've read your finaplix conversion recipe and it was indeed very interesting and unique in that it suggests the use of no solvents, merely carrier oil to dissolve the tren. With the standard method, using BA/BB, I find there is a lot of half dissolved pellets and/or residue floating within the pre-filtered solution and it makes me anxious that there is loss of TA as a result. I assume most of it is bi-product and filler that shouldn't be in the final product however, it still feels as though there might be a level of TA loss. What would you say the conversation rate of finaplix - > TA is with respect to loss of TA? Merely wondering for sake of curiosity and more accurate dosing.

3a. I'd just recently brewed some TA, though due to hastiness on my part, I believe some ethanol alcohol (190 proof) managed to get into the solution. I don't believe it could be more than 0.5% of the total solution but I am getting a very irritating sting post injection that lingers for a day plus. I had used a fairly high concentration of BA/BB (2/20) though, which may also be the culprit. I am wondering what's your opinion with regard to this? For now I will cut it with a sterile oil, which I assume will alleviate the issue though I am curious what could be causing the pain - the type of pain could be described as similar to the burning sensation of alcohol poured into an open wound though in my case it is less severe and merely an irritant rather than crippling pain.
 
Well, question isn't exactly correct as it is questions plural, however I have been curious about a few things and haven't been able to find answers.

1. Use of anti-androgens concurrent with use of AAS

I know that many steroid compounds, orals mainly, exhibit their effects on cells through pathways other than the androgen receptor due to their characteristic of having a poor binding affinity. Specifically though, I am wondering why then if this is true, that many oral compounds (and some injectables, ie 'deca') aren't employed with the concurrent usage of anti-androgens alongside as the user would reap a large portion of the steroids anabolic properties while avoiding a large portion of a steroids androgenic side effects? I could see this being particularly advantageous for women who would like to use higher dosages of anabolics, like anavar, without increasing the risk of virilization.

1a. In the same vein, I further wonder why 5-alpha reductase drugs aren't employed in women who use various esters of testosterone? The only risks I am aware of, with women using such drugs as finasteride or dutasteride, is if they are pregnant with a male fetus, and the lack of 5-ar enzymes will interfere with the fetus's development of male characteristics.

2. Oral steroids in injectable solution
I have mainly 2 questions in regard to this: firstly, I am wondering if the solution used to suspend/dissolve the steroid effects the absorption time of the steroid to a significant degree. I've read that the body can absorb the BA/BB faster than carrier oils and that occurrence can cause post injection "crashing" as a result in highly concentrated steroid solutions. So, I wonder even if a carrier oil such as EO is used and the absorption of the oil is very slow, will that effect the time for the hormone to be absorbed, at least to a significant degree? I've read many anecdotal reports that orals suspended in oils take longer to "feel" similarly with test-suspension versus test in oil.

2a. Second question, is there any evidence to suggest that injecting a steroid rather than ingesting it will cause the hormone (assuming equal amounts absorbed in both cases) to be less hepatotoxic? It seems logical that if the hormone can circulate through the body, through muscles and through the various other regions where the hormone can attach, before it reaches the liver, that it would have a higher ratio of anabolism to hepatotoxicity compared to oral ingestion. However, I am basing this merely on conjecture so I defer the question to people with bigger brains than I.

3. Bill, I've read your finaplix conversion recipe and it was indeed very interesting and unique in that it suggests the use of no solvents, merely carrier oil to dissolve the tren. With the standard method, using BA/BB, I find there is a lot of half dissolved pellets and/or residue floating within the pre-filtered solution and it makes me anxious that there is loss of TA as a result. I assume most of it is bi-product and filler that shouldn't be in the final product however, it still feels as though there might be a level of TA loss. What would you say the conversation rate of finaplix - > TA is with respect to loss of TA? Merely wondering for sake of curiosity and more accurate dosing.

3a. I'd just recently brewed some TA, though due to hastiness on my part, I believe some ethanol alcohol (190 proof) managed to get into the solution. I don't believe it could be more than 0.5% of the total solution but I am getting a very irritating sting post injection that lingers for a day plus. I had used a fairly high concentration of BA/BB (2/20) though, which may also be the culprit. I am wondering what's your opinion with regard to this? For now I will cut it with a sterile oil, which I assume will alleviate the issue though I am curious what could be causing the pain - the type of pain could be described as similar to the burning sensation of alcohol poured into an open wound though in my case it is less severe and merely an irritant rather than crippling pain.

Apparently steroids can still exert an effect in the presence of an anti-androgen, but the effects are vastly diminished. I think this is part of the reason why scientists are having trouble figuring out exactly how steroids can do its effects or one of the reasons why some believe the effects are not directly related to the androgen receptor. There's also the issue that human androgen receptors are fully saturated at natural levels.
 
Well, question isn't exactly correct as it is questions plural, however I have been curious about a few things and haven't been able to find answers.

1. Use of anti-androgens concurrent with use of AAS

I know that many steroid compounds, orals mainly, exhibit their effects on cells through pathways other than the androgen receptor due to their characteristic of having a poor binding affinity. Specifically though, I am wondering why then if this is true, that many oral compounds (and some injectables, ie 'deca') aren't employed with the concurrent usage of anti-androgens alongside as the user would reap a large portion of the steroids anabolic properties while avoiding a large portion of a steroids androgenic side effects? I could see this being particularly advantageous for women who would like to use higher dosages of anabolics, like anavar, without increasing the risk of virilization.

The reason is that the anti-androgens are just as much anti-anabolics.

1a. In the same vein, I further wonder why 5-alpha reductase drugs aren't employed in women who use various esters of testosterone? The only risks I am aware of, with women using such drugs as finasteride or dutasteride, is if they are pregnant with a male fetus, and the lack of 5-ar enzymes will interfere with the fetus's development of male characteristics.

I expect you are right with regard to development of facial hair, so far as providing some reduction of tendency to that effect, but for example with regard to voice change, I'm not at all sure that there would be any difference.

2. Oral steroids in injectable solution
I have mainly 2 questions in regard to this: firstly, I am wondering if the solution used to suspend/dissolve the steroid effects the absorption time of the steroid to a significant degree. I've read that the body can absorb the BA/BB faster than carrier oils and that occurrence can cause post injection "crashing" as a result in highly concentrated steroid solutions. So, I wonder even if a carrier oil such as EO is used and the absorption of the oil is very slow, will that effect the time for the hormone to be absorbed, at least to a significant degree? I've read many anecdotal reports that orals suspended in oils take longer to "feel" similarly with test-suspension versus test in oil.

The major effect here is particle size. Injected particles in a suspension will dissolve far less rapidly in the injected tissue than they will in the GI tract.

2a. Second question, is there any evidence to suggest that injecting a steroid rather than ingesting it will cause the hormone (assuming equal amounts absorbed in both cases) to be less hepatotoxic? It seems logical that if the hormone can circulate through the body, through muscles and through the various other regions where the hormone can attach, before it reaches the liver, that it would have a higher ratio of anabolism to hepatotoxicity compared to oral ingestion. However, I am basing this merely on conjecture so I defer the question to people with bigger brains than I.

I know of no such evidence, though I can't rule out that there could be such an effect. If there is such an effect, at least with Winstrol any difference isn't obvious.

3. Bill, I've read your finaplix conversion recipe and it was indeed very interesting and unique in that it suggests the use of no solvents, merely carrier oil to dissolve the tren. With the standard method, using BA/BB, I find there is a lot of half dissolved pellets and/or residue floating within the pre-filtered solution and it makes me anxious that there is loss of TA as a result. I assume most of it is bi-product and filler that shouldn't be in the final product however, it still feels as though there might be a level of TA loss. What would you say the conversation rate of finaplix - > TA is with respect to loss of TA? Merely wondering for sake of curiosity and more accurate dosing.

If using an accurate amount of pellets, the only loss is from remaining volume of oil trapped in the sediment. I've never measured this but it should be less than 10% I would think.

3a. I'd just recently brewed some TA, though due to hastiness on my part, I believe some ethanol alcohol (190 proof) managed to get into the solution. I don't believe it could be more than 0.5% of the total solution but I am getting a very irritating sting post injection that lingers for a day plus. I had used a fairly high concentration of BA/BB (2/20) though, which may also be the culprit. I am wondering what's your opinion with regard to this? For now I will cut it with a sterile oil, which I assume will alleviate the issue though I am curious what could be causing the pain - the type of pain could be described as similar to the burning sensation of alcohol poured into an open wound though in my case it is less severe and merely an irritant rather than crippling pain.

I don't know. I've never done that. I've often had trace amounts of 90% isopropyl alcohol in a vial resulting from washing a vial and preferring to leave the IPA in there rather than air it out and possibly introduce particles from the air, but I never concurrently used BA at the same time.

It might be the case that the remaining water from the alcohol is resulting in an aqueous phase that is high in BA and is resulting in the irritation. In other words, the oil part of the vehicle has only a moderate BA concentration, but there are droplets of water that are high in BA. However, if you're not seeing any visible haze from water then this theory is unlikely, and if it's not this then I have no idea unfortunately.
 
Dont be in a hurry to do the conversion,you need to shake the solution every so often untill all the pellets are disolved,then let it sit and the binders will settle to the bottom.The most important thing is to be consistant in the way you do the conversion.if you let it sit for a long time 2-3 weeks almost all of the binders will settle to the bottom and what you have left will be much easier to filter,even with a 20u filter.
 
Last edited:
If doing more than one conversion, a jewelry or gun sonicator is well worth the investment. (The vial is put standing into the water bath, and the ultrasonic vibration gives fast dissolution.)
 
I have only ever used three sonicators -- a laboratory-grade one, a SharperTek I bought for cleaning guns though it is a general purpose unit, and a cheap jewelry one -- and all worked fine, so I don't think that brand makes much if any difference for this purpose.

The SharperTek, which I've used for many years, is an SH-150. They don't sell that exact model anymore but do have similar models. The cheapest that would be big enough for most handguns is $450.

More than needed for dissolving pellets, but I have no way of knowing, you might like cleaning guns with ultrasonic as well :)
 
Last edited:
I had a couple of Desert Eagles and the ultrasonic enabled cleaning within the gas ports, which otherwise is hard to do. It's possible to push bore paste through the port, but more difficult and with time this would enlarge the port slightly, so it's more a fix for being already dirty than it is a means to keep continually clean.

Fill a sonicator with Ballistol, put in the stripped gun, sonicate... excellent.

And somewhat off topic, admittedly.
 
Back
Top