Hey guys. I have been in the hospital. I have been having tests done on me. Sometimes a person needs to take a break and worry about other things like health. At 40 I am not gonna kick over. So if I wasn't around and didn't respond to a few pm there was a reason.
I don't know if this is just BS or not, nor will I ever know, but if any of the guys reading this thread have been around Meso at least two years, they surely scoff at this "reason" for the inactivity. Many sources here have claimed similar extenuating circumstances to explain their absence coinciding with bad blood work, shorted vials, bad customer services, etc.
In the past, this has always been done for the purpose of damage control, attempting to soften the blow of critics. Does this accurately characterize you (this is rhetorical grademan)? I don't know.
Looked at the bloodwork test. I would not say it's bad. Everyone is different. I have seen A blood test from one of our customers which I posted from atlas sus
750 mg week come back at 7200. Each of us is different. At 500 mg week I would say that's not bad. I have seen lower on a ugl labs. Personally I wouldn't want overdosed gear or under dosed. I want to thank throwback for posting this too.
In an attempt to defend and discredit what could be underdosed results on your test product, you say a customer (who?) at one point in time (when) used atlas sus and came back with 7200 on 750...so we must conclude then that all atlas gear is legit, right? Give me a break.
Additionally, you think 2500 on 500 is not bad because you've seen lower on different UGL products. You're using a reported case of underdosed gear from a different UGL to support your claim of Atlas product quality? This is just another fallacy in the UGL playbook to deflect criticisms of bad products.
Now for the record, I agree everyone is different and as I stated some pages back, aside from analytical testing, established blood work with prescription test is the best way to determine the concentration of UGL test.
The reason I pointed out the logical fallacy of grademan's post made is because some wanted him to show up and give "lip service." Well, that's exactly what the above from grademan is - lip service.
He came back and told you exactly what you want to hear: "there was a serious health reason for my lack of activity, everyone is different, and I'm going to be more active so the coddling can continue..." Everyone feel better now? lol
@grademan glad to see you back and active. That's what we need to see[emoji1303][emoji1303][emoji1303]
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Lip service, indeed. But why do you need to see this?
Do you really expect him to say it's underdosed? Whether it is or not we can't say for sure but why do you or anyone else need the UGL to provide any insight? They're inherently biased, wouldn't you agree?
Some were saying underdosed. I thought was about right where should be.
That reminds me, can you please tell me more about those TT values you posted a couple days ago? I asked you about them but you must have missed it.
I suspect they're nadir values, which is why I asked. If they are nadir, that means those same people would have much higher TT values if blood draw was at peak.
