wildfuchs
Subscriber
Sorry, could you clarify what 'get you run out of here' means? Do you have the power to kick me out of Meso after all? I thought making false accusations was completely fine based on this thread.
MESO-Rx
Anabolic Steroids
Results from Jano
- Thread starter shawn2551
- Start date
I already offered my explanation. The source didn’t know shit about making caps. So if he fucked up the accutane he probably fucked up every product in a cap. So yes I agree with Shaun that the other products in caps are all underdosed or fucked up.
We’re customers of GOOD sources. We ask that any new UGL that sources here HAVE THEIR OWN TESTING. Or we harass them. Nobody really buys the product and the source goes away. Fuck that source, we didn’t need them anyway.
We encourage members to submit their own samples for testing. So when the UGLs fuck up and can’t fix the fuck up we light the torches and burn the source. There’s always nut-huggers and fanbois that insist the source made an innocent mistake.
The dogmatic belief usually works too.
And honestly, none of this is new. It’s been this way for almost 2 years now. Every point you make is either purposely “whoopsie dumb” or you’re crafting your responses to appear that way.
No, he doesn’t. But imagine how much fun this place will be for you if you login, make a post, and it’s relentlessly belittled, bullied and pissed on.
Wait, that’s kind of where you’re at right now.
And this post is why everyone thinks suspicious behavior. You are still trying to prove your point about a source screwing up and generalizing how it happens.
mands
It means exactly what I stated. I shouldn't have to clarify.
I have not posted any false accusations. Please quote me on one of them and I will gladly shut my mouth.
I'm done playing with you for today little child.
For the record you are more than just a reseller I see.
mands
wildfuchs
Subscriber
I straight up asked him questions that I wanted to know an honest answer to but in usual Meso fashion he dodged them. We aren't even talking about a source that's present on Meso, so what would the (or my) motive be to defend a source that (according to a post from OP) hasn't logged into their SST account for a month or so either? That's like standing guard on a grave. And to carry on with that imagery, this topic has been beaten to death, it's become quite stale.
wildfuchs
Subscriber
Alright, I'll go next: Mands is more than just a reseller. This also means exactly what I stated and I shouldn't have to clarify.
Hey @PlatinumFuchs,
Nobody is interested in under dosed bs or your excuses as to why shit happens. If you had it your way, members should just take it on the chin instead of calling out bs like this. If you want to be a source, nobody is stopping you. But don't think you are going to come around here and change the way you bottom feeders are vetted. If you were half as smart as you think you are, you wouldn't have guys on your ass, giving you a hard time.
Nobody is interested in under dosed bs or your excuses as to why shit happens. If you had it your way, members should just take it on the chin instead of calling out bs like this. If you want to be a source, nobody is stopping you. But don't think you are going to come around here and change the way you bottom feeders are vetted. If you were half as smart as you think you are, you wouldn't have guys on your ass, giving you a hard time.
wildfuchs
Subscriber
oh come on, I don't have an issue with your insults but this isn't how humans work at all. people get shit on because they go against popular belief, whether that is right or wrong, smart or stupid doesn't matter at all. plenty of good & smart people have been burned at the stake, plenty of retards been elected president of the US by popular vote.
Wow. That’s a BIG ol deflection!
You're getting shit because you are backing sources instead of members who got ripped off. Go to a source board that edits or deletes posts and you will fit right in. This is not how meso gets down, however. And for the record, presidents of the US aren't voted into office via popular vote.
MisterSuperGod
Well-known Member
wildfuchs
Subscriber
There's no need for deleting posts since you don't read posts anyways. Guess you're voting for Trump again.
So what does Fuch's Pharma list look like? No reason to wait until Friday. You don't give a shit about Meso's other requirements anyway.
And yes.
MAGA motherfucker. Trump 2020
Not at all on topic but has anyone had an update on @RogerRabbit. Its been a while since I saw an update on him.
I was just thinking about him the other day as I slowly outline my upcoming cycle. Man is a wealth of knowledge
I've gave this kid plenty of chances. If he doesn't come out of the closet you will see soon enough
mands
wildfuchs
Subscriber
Did you not want to expose which boards I am a source on or what my alt accounts are or something like that?I've gave this kid plenty of chances. If he doesn't come out of the closet you will see soon enough
mands
The extent of my sourcing on Meso goes no further than offering to fulfill a handful of people's requests for products from EU sources they did not have in stock or were no longer offering (identical product, off site, via encrypted mail - my opsec is to Meso standard).
I asked the sources in question whether this would be okay with them in advance. I've contacted a total of 4-5 members which resulted in 1-2 actual sales. As a small/private source I'm not employed by anyone and don't have a website or thread or anything, which you actually know very well but you keep suggesting I'm up to some grand mischief due to some personal vendetta of yours.
I've openly posted about purchasing amounts clearly beyond any reasonable personal use, posted about my clients using products etc., so I'm not exactly hiding as much as you make people believe.
If you have any real interest in cleaning out the closet, specify what further aspects you are talking about and don't make veiled threats or suggestions. I'll speak clearly so hopefully you have the decency to do so as well.
This has to be sworder. He talks exactly the same? Arguing for the sake of argueing, to make conversation about nothing
