Roidtest kits

[zatsiorsky]

Hey all,

(Disclaimer: I am a rep of this company, but am compensated in product alone at the moment. This leads me to be biased in support of this particular company, but personally I love labmax, and was happy to be invited to support a competitor that has such similar products IMO.)

Roidtest.com offers a line of presumptive at-home AAS testing products, either sold individually or in kits.

The price is highly competitive, the tests effective, and the results as rapid as any would expect who are familiar with this type of testing.

Right now, the website is offering 25% off all products using code PREORDER which is also listed on the main page.

The company has partnered with William Llewelyn, the author of Anabolics and founder of Anabolics.com.

Nothing terribly fancy, honestly, just a good way to verify initial content for sources, and a good tool along with bloods and MassSpec.

 

[rpbb]

what differentiates it from labmax

 

[flenser]

what differentiates it from labmax

Well, the price is higher, but the rep speaks better English.

No pics or videos of tests; just a color chart. Also, most of the color chart's UV responses are "nil". The rest, if my bad eyes aren't mistaken, are similar shades of green.

 

[zatsiorsky]

Well, the price is higher, but the rep speaks better English.

No pics or videos of tests; just a color chart. Also, most of the color chart's UV responses are "nil". The rest, if my bad eyes aren't mistaken, are similar shades of green.

Thanks for the compliment, though this is a local company, and so not too surprising when we actually speak the language.

Regarding our website, I will forward the request for videos on (it's a good idea, or course).

Overall, a very similar product, but coming in to distributers, shipping domestically (not that there is concern, but regarding speed and shipping costs), and with some awesome partners, I'm personally excited to see this line roll out this month and increase our ability to test products effectively.

 

[ebkallday]

You say domestic. This is a US based company? Or at least ships within US?

 

[Wunderpus]

Thanks for the compliment, though this is a local company, and so not too surprising when we actually speak the language.

Regarding our website, I will forward the request for videos on (it's a good idea, or course).

Overall, a very similar product, but coming in to distributers, shipping domestically (not that there is concern, but regarding speed and shipping costs), and with some awesome partners, I'm personally excited to see this line roll out this month and increase our ability to test products effectively.

In RED, how do you plan to actually prove this is more effective than labmax? Or, if it's equally as effective, what does that even mean?

Reason I ask is, Labmax has PROVEN to not be anywhere near 100% effective. Especially with certain compounds more than others (test and tren seem to work pretty well, others not so much).

Lastly, are you a former member of this board, with a new handle?

 

[zatsiorsky]

You say domestic. This is a US based company? Or at least ships within US?

Yes, Roidtest is US Domestic, both in ownership and distribution.

 

[zatsiorsky]

In RED, how do you plan to actually prove this is more effective than labmax? Or, if it's equally as effective, what does that even mean?

Reason I ask is, Labmax has PROVEN to not be anywhere near 100% effective. Especially with certain compounds more than others (test and tren seem to work pretty well, others not so much).

Lastly, are you a former member of this board, with a new handle?

I meant no comparison of efficacy in that last sentence, more talking about the advantages to the PED/AAS world of having readily available tests. My apologies for any confusion that my wording caused.

That being said, I think information about the efficacy of all tests is important, and will try to produce something more than my word.

I am holding my breath for an affordable home LCMS, as I would LOVE to have that level of analysis, but am personally dedicated to running confirmations on products before I, myself, use them for the first time.

To answer your last question:

This is my only account listed through Meso. I have read Meso for a long time, found some good and also terrible sources through here, but never opened an account.

I don't expect trust on this statement, as I have seen how many reps hide under multiple IP addresses and accounts, but I can ask you to watch me as I continue to be on Meso and repping for Roidtest and judge me based on this.

 

[zatsiorsky]

Btw, the affordable home LCMS is not realistic at this time, just on my wish list.

 

[Wunderpus]

I meant no comparison of efficacy in that last sentence, more talking about the advantages to the PED/AAS world of having readily available tests. My apologies for any confusion that my wording caused.

That being said, I think information about the efficacy of all tests is important, and will try to produce something more than my word.

I am holding my breath for an affordable home LCMS, as I would LOVE to have that level of analysis, but am personally dedicated to running confirmations on products before I, myself, use them for the first time.

To answer your last question:

This is my only account listed through Meso. I have read Meso for a long time, found some good and also terrible sources through here, but never opened an account.

I don't expect trust on this statement, as I have seen how many reps hide under multiple IP addresses and accounts, but I can ask you to watch me as I continue to be on Meso and repping for Roidtest and judge me based on this.

Sure, regarding the first statement, though..... How is "testing" at all effective, if the tests aren't actually effective at all?

What are they effective for, in your opinion? Can they be skewed by carrier oils and/or contaminants?

 

[flenser]

@zatsiorsky the color chart on the web site has a very large number of similar colors in the A-B vials and virtually all greens or nils in the UV test. Can you address my concerns below? Thanks.

From using LM tests, I the color similarities between different AAS as a very significant issue when testing UGL products. They are almost never pure enough to match colors exactly. I see a lot of potential for ambiguous results; more so than with LM which is saying a lot.

Also, the UV response is the most important, since it is the only way you will know there is hormone present for certain - correct me if I'm wrong here. A nil result isn't going top provide any useful information.

 

[flenser]

I should mention also that prices are NOT "highly competitive". A multi-steroid single test is $25 compared to LM A-B test at $17. Even with your 25% discount, the cost is higher for yours. Also, 20 LM A-B tests is $161, or just $8.05 each. I was considering getting a few tests to play with, but your prices are outrageous.

 

[Wunderpus]

I should mention also that prices are NOT "highly competitive". A multi-steroid single test is $25 compared to LM A-B test at $17. Even with your 25% discount, the cost is higher for yours. Also, 20 LM A-B tests is $161, or just $8.05 each. I was considering getting a few tests to play with, but your prices are outrageous.

What I'm seeing is a higher priced, harder to read and equally as "effective" test being sold as a competitor..... You too?

 

[ebola]

It looks to me like something home made.

 

[flenser]

What I'm seeing is a higher priced, harder to read and equally as "effective" test being sold as a competitor..... You too?

Yea, exactly that. A lower price might make it worth something for a couple of the powders, though. NPP and Primo powders have pretty unique results, for example.

 

[weighted chinup]

@zatsiorsky Can you teach me everything you know about biomechanics in sport? Thank you in advance.

 

[zatsiorsky]

Sure, regarding the first statement, though..... How is "testing" at all effective, if the tests aren't actually effective at all?

What are they effective for, in your opinion? Can they be skewed by carrier oils and/or contaminants?

This class of test confirms or denies the presence of a given AAS in oil, powder, liquid, or pill.

For the base of your question - why bother testing?

I am a healthy individual outside of AAS. I exercise, eat well, manage stress, and avoid drugs and alcohol. So, when I use AAS, I want the best accessible means to know what I am getting. That includes doing my research on here and other boards, being careful with who I choose, and using test kits when I am unsure or working with anyone new to me.

Your question certainly highlights where I would like to see accessible technology develop.

 

[rpbb]

This class of test confirms or denies the presence of a given AAS in oil, powder, liquid, or pill.

For the base of your question - why bother testing?

I am a healthy individual outside of AAS. I exercise, eat well, manage stress, and avoid drugs and alcohol. So, when I use AAS, I want the best accessible means to know what I am getting. That includes doing my research on here and other boards, being careful with who I choose, and using test kits when I am unsure or working with anyone new to me.

Your question certainly highlights where I would like to see accessible technology develop.

i was hoping that you had a better technology than labmax

 

[ebola]

i was hoping that you had a better technology than labmax

The next step is Hplc, this some copycat only

 

[Wunderpus]

The next step is Hplc, this some copycat only

Now with many sources funding HPLC, I believe these at home tests are largely obsolete. I will still use them for basic compounds like tren and test, though.