RRoids
Subscriber
Welcome sir,And you like naps.
Methyl Mike said:
I understand the collective is very anti-Naps and me personally I kind of get it and I kind of don't.
If it were up to me I would prefer if people commenting were past customers and stop the piling on because it makes us look immature. Vetting of sources yes I get that, protecting people new to the black market is noble. But redundancy is exactly that, it is not progressive it solves/accomplishes nothing.
Why vet sources? Because there is a goal.
Why care about harm reduction? Again, there is something to be achieved.
Piling on one source or.another, over and over again accomplishes what? What is the goal? Can anyone actually tell me what is expected of Naps that he isn't doing?
Mighty Mouse hinted on lack of testing. Is that an issue?
Bbbg hinted at a few issues, I think poor opsec (retaining customer data past the transaction) and generally a lack of desire to solve complaints and a perceived desire to control what people see ie suppression of those who got screwed and were never taken care of. Did I miss something?
If the collective has other, pertinent grievances with Naps advertising here perhaps raise them now. Preferably in a clear, concise manner. From there Naps is free to address them disregard them or whatever. Its his business.
I'm just sick of people going in circles when I know most likely none or very few of them were ever his customers. And yes, there is a difference. With sources there are always good and bad rumors gossip etc but one person's experience does not mean your experience will be the same.
I ordered from.Naps and got what I paid for in timely fashion. I never bought from him again because there's just too many damned choices on his site. Its also too risky receiving mail from (country witheld) for me.
I do not get people and their "gotta have this or that brand and nothing else is good" mentality. I use a ugl, products are good prices are good and I don't have to research current gossip on such and such lab and then decipher who has an agenda etc etc. Its time consuming. For that reason I don't buy from Naps.
I am indifferent. He's a source. No more or less important than any other.
The burnt vial of tren how many years ago now was that? 6? 8?
Just
Like Quote Reply
We consider all data written about us here as 'demand'. @Metil Mike , @Mighty-mouse we take into account what you and everyone else have written and then we evaluate it under the heading 'request'
Since we aim for maximum satisfaction in our customer relations, we have been trying to act with this principle for years.
There are so many resources, products and fakes on the market. We do not find it strange to be cautious and sensitive to a new source, sir. As I mentioned to @bigJhon, we will publish clear, answer-filled text that gathers the requested information. reshipping, privacy policy, packaging options, delivery times, etc.
We will post them once and then leave a link to all of this information at the bottom of each of our daily product, promotion or information posts.
We do not find it beneficial in the long run to keep variable information (photos, tests, prices and brand names etc.) in the first view of our homepage, sir. I would like to not think that those who post them in MESO are considered very good, or those who do not are considered very bad.
We will always be here to respond to any information request with respect and understanding.
