Shree Venkatesh Trebol 100 - HPLC/TAMC/TYMC/ICP-OES - 2016-01 - SIMEC via AnabolicLab.com

if you account for the ester weight then that's not all that bad is it?

100mg of ace should contain 80odd (i wanna say 83) mg of hormone IIRC?
 
No it's a bad result and you don't take ester weight into account bc it was testing for tren acetate.

Unless im missing something, that makes no sense lol.

Rather than me trying to explain, have a skim over this:

Code:
http://forums.steroidal.com/anabolic-steroids-forum/50-steroid-remaining-after-ester-removed.html
 
Here is a picture of a Shree Venkatesh executive preparing the letter threatening legal action, again:

_38156905_india_computer300.jpg
 
Unless im missing something, that makes no sense lol.

Rather than me trying to explain, have a skim over this:

Code:
http://forums.steroidal.com/anabolic-steroids-forum/50-steroid-remaining-after-ester-removed.html

I understood what you were getting at but it's not applicable to this situation.
 
If you test for trenbolone acetate you are testing for the whole compound! Not just Trenbolone but trenbolone plus an ester attached.

Unless you are testing test or Tren suspension you always test for an hormone attached to a damn esther.

Testosterone + enanthate
Testosterone + propionate

How much the esther weight is something not related to how these testing are done and the results we expect. When you sell a vial of trenbolone acetate 100mg/ml
You are selling trenbolone attached to the acetate Esther. If you sell 78mg of Tren ace you are selling even less Tren then 100mg/ml because you need to take account of the Esther attached that it's still there!


Do you get it? The laboratory doesn't test for trenbolone but for trenbolone + esther if they were going to test only for the substance: Trenbolone the result would have been even lower.
 

Sponsors

Back
Top