Im not that smart to understand why, i have probably 15 more kits or lobster and 10 more kits os ssa.
The lobster is 10iu tested 11iu 97%
SSA is 15IU tested 18IU 96%
(And yes, i do fill SSA with 1.5ml bac water to easy on my math)
It's not you, I think a lot, if not most people associate side effects with lower quality. It seems reasonable, until you consider these are exactly the same effects common in patients treated with pharma.
Even Jano speculated it came down to dosing differences, not "impurities", which is sensible.
The medical literature links rHGH sides to 2 factors.
One is the dose, obviously. The higher the iu, the higher the rate of sides goes, always.
The same sides we experience using ugl rHGH are experienced in controlled pharma studies and observed in patients.
So a vial that you don't realize is overdosed could cause it. Just because one vial tested at 31iu, doesn't mean the next isn't 37iu, 20% higher.
The next factor is speed of absorption. The faster the spike in GH, the higher it goes, and the more sides are reported. Higher dilution lowers this spike. So if you can dilute more, making the volume larger, it may help.
Finally, a certain amount of rHGH is not folded properly, and because of that those molecules don't work. This applies to pharma and UGL. The thing is, improperly folded rHGH will count as "pure", because the testing we use can't check for proper folding.
If one batch has 95% properly folded, active rHGH and another is 86% properly folded, they could show identical 97% purity, but at exactly the same dose, the one with more active rHGH is more potent and could cause sides while the one with less active rHGH feels "cleaner".
So there you've got the various possibilities accounting for differences in sides between batches.
It sounds reasonable on the surface, but "impurities" have never been linked to rHGH sides.(they can cause other problems, but that's another subject).