Sigma Audley Raws - Jano Labtest

[Sampei]

Janoshik Analytical

Janoshik Analytical

Janoshik Analytical

Janoshik Analytical

Janoshik Analytical

Janoshik Analytical

Janoshik Analytical

Janoshik Analytical

Janoshik Analytical

Janoshik Analytical

Janoshik Analytical

Big thanks to @readalot that helped out in covering half of the cost of these labtest.

Enjoy, even so they just stopped selling raws. I feel quite happy about the results, some stuff could have been slightly better but for the price I got it, It was a steal.

Customer service has been excellent all the way from the first communication to the last.

I have to say that's their strongest quality.

 

[Sampei]

@SigmaAudley China Peptide

 

[readalot]

View attachment 301958View attachment 301959View attachment 301960View attachment 301961View attachment 301962View attachment 301963View attachment 301964View attachment 301965View attachment 301966View attachment 301967View attachment 301968

Janoshik Analytical

Janoshik Analytical

Janoshik Analytical

Janoshik Analytical

Janoshik Analytical

Janoshik Analytical

Janoshik Analytical

Janoshik Analytical

Janoshik Analytical

Janoshik Analytical

Janoshik Analytical

Big thanks to @readalot that helped out in covering half of the cost of these labtest.

Enjoy, even so they just stopped selling raws. I feel quite happy about the results, some stuff could have been slightly better but for the price I got it, It was a steal.

Customer service has been excellent all the way from the first communication to the last.

I have to say that's their strongest quality.

Some of the tests (most) still need correction on reporting format and raw data. Reporting as XX%+ not the way to go as I posted previously. I am hopeful Team @janoshik will correct all these as per the email I sent them yesterday.

Also, total sample masses tested are missing from many of the raw data pdf docs. No way to confirm purity calcs without the number for the denominator of the calculation.

For reference, this is part of the Project 2 data set on the enhanced testing thread.

 

[SigmaAudley China Peptide]

@SigmaAudley China Peptide Can you confirm whats going on?

Currently we only sell peptides and APIs. We will update our product list on Monday.

 

[Sampei]

Some of the tests (most) still need correction on reporting format and raw data. Reporting as XX%+ not the way to go as I posted previously. I am hopeful Team @janoshik will correct all these as per the email I sent them yesterday.

Also, total sample masses tested are missing from many of the raw data pdf docs. No way to confirm purity calcs without the number for the denominator of the calculation.

For reference, this is part of the Project 2 data set on the enhanced testing thread.

Yes this is only the purity for home brewer interested in the raw for brewing oils.

Raw data need to be amended for readalot project

 

[readalot]

Yes this is only the purity for home brewer interested in the raw for brewing oils.

The point is the actual calculated purity is missing on the majority of those reports!

Not good enough. Purity estimate distinctly a separate entity from MOE. They should be reportedly separately.

 

[Sampei]

The point is the actual calculated purity is missing on the majority of those reports!

Actually I don't think it is, you can calculate it with the raw data the mass used is on the name of the raw and you just need to run the math from the concentration MG.

I'm on my mobile and it's complicated to visualize it let me try

 

[readalot]

Actually I don't think it is, you can calculate it with the raw data the mass used is on the name of the raw and you just need to run the math from the concentration MG.

I'm on my mobile and it's complicated to visualize it let me try

The raw data file should clearly list the sample mass with units. Someone shouldn't have to guess based on a number in the filename without units. Not acceptable. Just isn't.

 

[Sampei]

Janoshik Analytical

Take this one for example: Trenbolone look the name 35 at the end means it has been used 35mg

Concentration is 33.66

So (33.66/35)*100=96.17%

Yeah I'm just explaining what has been told to me, don't shoot the messenger.

 

[readalot]

Janoshik Analytical

Take this one for example: Trenbolone look the name 35 at the end means it has been used 35mg

Concentration is 33.66

So (33.66/35)*100=96.17%

Yeah I'm just explaining what has been told to me, don't shoot the messenger.

We paid for the raw data. Should not have to do guess work. Absurd. But thanks for trying.

 

[Sampei]

@SigmaAudley China Peptide Can you confirm whats going on?

Can you please delete this message? You are spamming a thread with useless stuff. Shame on you

 

[TyroneBiggums]

Can you please delete this message? You are spamming a thread with useless stuff. Shame on you

My bad. Thought it was relevant.

 

[Sampei]

My bad. Thought it was relevant.

Post on their main thread not on the lab test section mate.

 

[TyroneBiggums]

Post on their main thread not on the lab test section mate.

Yea my bad. I clicked the wrong the thread. Just read through the posts from last night.

 

[bighunanballs]

Y'all killing it with all this testing $$$

 

[janoshik]

We paid for the raw data. Should not have to do guess work. Absurd. But thanks for trying.

I believe I explained our format of noting down things necessary for interpretation with the first raw data (BU) I ever sent you and then twice again and I've thought that sufficient.

Raw data are called raw for a reason my friend.

If easy to read result is needed and requested, that's what the default report format is.

Unfortunately, as of now, we're not ready to automate raw data export yet and not willing to use significant manhours on them. We don't have the manpower right now and I believe I've already far exceeded the time I was PAID to have allotted to all this.

I don't think argument "we have paid for this" is appropriate, when I have explained it multiple times already and especially if you consider what time allottment would be appropriate for a 5 USD fee. Frankly, it is mildly upsetting for me.

We as a company, due to overload, currently provide raw data only on my authorization. Please don't make me regret granting one for your project - out of my appreciation.

Thank you and cheers

 

[readalot]

I believe I explained our format of noting down things necessary for interpretation with the first raw data (BU) I ever sent you and then twice again and I've thought that sufficient.

Raw data are called raw for a reason my friend.

If easy to read result is needed and requested, that's what the default report format is.

Unfortunately, as of now, we're not ready to automate raw data export yet and not willing to use significant manhours on them. We don't have the manpower right now and I believe I've already far exceeded the time I was PAID to have allotted to all this.

I don't think argument "we have paid for this" is appropriate, when I have explained it multiple times already and especially if you consider what time allottment would be appropriate for a 5 USD fee. Frankly, it is mildly upsetting for me.

We as a company, due to overload, currently provide raw data only on my authorization. Please don't make me regret granting one for your project - out of my appreciation.

Thank you and cheers

Understood and thanks for all the time you have volunteered on the project. Your raw data fee is extremely fair and I am sorry you are mildly upset. I am sorry I am overbearing on data with numbers and units. I get it; we aren't working together in R&D center. Let's continue the dialogue and I appreciate the assistance and communication. I've been very clear on the excellent communication and service you and your team has provided. Take care and have a good weekend.

 

[readalot]

We paid a very meager amount for the raw data. Should not have to do guess work. Absurd. But thanks for trying.

I amend my wording. Should not have used the word absurd. Jano's team is doing a commendable job with dealing with someone like me.