Raider72
New Member
HCG from a TRT standpoint pretty legit though
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
And I just may look into using itHCG from a TRT standpoint pretty legit though
Ok I'm lying a bit, the sheath comes off to fill the pin but then I put it back on while its heating up.
Edit: no actually it doesn't come off cuz I use an 18 to draw and a 23 to shoot. Lol confused myself there
I'm sorry but this is not a list of supplements one SHOULD be taking.
1) whey protein is completely unnecessary if you already are getting adequate protein from other sources. If you're deficient In protein great, take some and up your intake. If you're not deficient in protein adding whey will do nothing for you.
2) creatine is great and has plenty of science to support it's efficacy. It's hard to get the same level of creatine through diet as with supplementation but this alone doesn't mean you should take it. Would it help, sure if you're a responder to it, but that alone doesn't mean you should take it.
3) most multis are worthless. Even the decent ones aren't worth much/overpriced considering if you simply eat a balanced diet you're already getting what you need. You're making the fallacy of assuming more is always better which is not the case. Just bc Mg is needed for over 300 bodily functions doesn't mean you need anymore of it than you're currently getting. You have no idea what's optimal in terms of vitamin intake since it can vary dramatically through the diet. Without focusing on dietary deficiencies or sufficiencies youre simply throwing shit on a wall and hoping it sticks. Again, not something that SHOULD be taken or even considered a staple.
4) dextrose is poor way to spend your money and worthless. Yes glucose elicits an insulin response but that doesn't mean buying dextrose is warranted. He'll any carb source or protein source will elicit an insulin response. You fail to mention why dextrose is needed as a pre or post workout carb source, why it's beneficial for any reason, etc.
5) your betaine anhydrous claims are based on insufficient research. A few studies have shown potential benefits while many others have shown none. You mention one benefit as increasing synthesis of creatine yet before that you mention creatine supplementation. Creatine supplementation will already FULLY SATURATE skeletal muscle tissue with creatine if taken 2-5g daily. Meaning even if you increase it's synthesis in the body with betaine, it cannot be stored bc you're already saturated with it. You also say it's for added strength on top of creatine but that's funny bc studies have shown no additional benefit of betaine supplementation with co-intake of creatine in regards to ergogenics.
6) citrulline mallate has the same argument as betaine, it helps creatine synthesis but you already mentioned supplemental creatine which makes this a moot point aka waste if money. What exactly are you proposing that nitric oxide does that warrants it being a staple supplement? To date there are only two studies showing positive ergogenic effects of citrulline and one of them is a finger flexion study....yes you read that correct, finger flexion.
7) BCAAs are worthless when consuming adequate protein. And if you are protein deficient, whey has many benefits over bcaa making them that much more a waste of money. Yes mTor is responsible for protein synthesis but it's also responsible for lipid synthesis as well. Catch 22 anyone? Not only leucine activates mTor though. Oxygen levels, energy levels, growth factors, and amino acids activate mTor. With adequate protein intake there's absolutely no reason to need BCAAs. You also neglected to mention how glutamine levels are essential to leucine activating mTor since glutamine acts as the transporter for leucine into the cell.
HCG is a scam period...urologist friend of mine laughed at me when I tell him what I see people say about it on aas forums
Totally concur with this...why so much money people waste on this crap its ridiculous. All it takes to get big is to get your fat ass into the gym regularly and working out on a consistent basis as well as eating decently.
The lesson learned here..And rehashed over and over(But every time ever so true) Take the time to look at the classic bodybuilders..look at the eras before any of the muscletech hype.It wasn't needed then and not now either.Food and water and stimulus ...that's it.
Sorry, misread your post.
I do agree with you that all that you need to do is train hard and eat enough real food.
I do like my luxury supplements, though.
Yea I wasn't serious about the diet lol. The concept is pretty funny though: take some HCG and eat 500calories a day and you "magically" lose weight![]()
food organic multi)
Optional:
-DAA (3g a day for a natural test booster)
Enjoy!
I'm sorry but this is not a list of supplements one SHOULD be taking.
1) whey protein is completely unnecessary if you already are getting adequate protein from other sources. If you're deficient In protein great, take some and up your intake. If you're not deficient in protein adding whey will do nothing for you.
2) creatine is great and has plenty of science to support it's efficacy. It's hard to get the same level of creatine through diet as with supplementation but this alone doesn't mean you should take it. Would it help, sure if you're a responder to it, but that alone doesn't mean you should take it.
3) most multis are worthless. Even the decent ones aren't worth much/overpriced considering if you simply eat a balanced diet you're already getting what you need. You're making the fallacy of assuming more is always better which is not the case. Just bc Mg is needed for over 300 bodily functions doesn't mean you need anymore of it than you're currently getting. You have no idea what's optimal in terms of vitamin intake since it can vary dramatically through the diet. Without focusing on dietary deficiencies or sufficiencies youre simply throwing shit on a wall and hoping it sticks. Again, not something that SHOULD be taken or even considered a staple.
4) dextrose is poor way to spend your money and worthless. Yes glucose elicits an insulin response but that doesn't mean buying dextrose is warranted. He'll any carb source or protein source will elicit an insulin response. You fail to mention why dextrose is needed as a pre or post workout carb source, why it's beneficial for any reason, etc.
5) your betaine anhydrous claims are based on insufficient research. A few studies have shown potential benefits while many others have shown none. You mention one benefit as increasing synthesis of creatine yet before that you mention creatine supplementation. Creatine supplementation will already FULLY SATURATE skeletal muscle tissue with creatine if taken 2-5g daily. Meaning even if you increase it's synthesis in the body with betaine, it cannot be stored bc you're already saturated with it. You also say it's for added strength on top of creatine but that's funny bc studies have shown no additional benefit of betaine supplementation with co-intake of creatine in regards to ergogenics.
6) citrulline mallate has the same argument as betaine, it helps creatine synthesis but you already mentioned supplemental creatine which makes this a moot point aka waste if money. What exactly are you proposing that nitric oxide does that warrants it being a staple supplement? To date there are only two studies showing positive ergogenic effects of citrulline and one of them is a finger flexion study....yes you read that correct, finger flexion.
7) BCAAs are worthless when consuming adequate protein. And if you are protein deficient, whey has many benefits over bcaa making them that much more a waste of money. Yes mTor is responsible for protein synthesis but it's also responsible for lipid synthesis as well. Catch 22 anyone? Not only leucine activates mTor though. Oxygen levels, energy levels, growth factors, and amino acids activate mTor. With adequate protein intake there's absolutely no reason to need BCAAs. You also neglected to mention how glutamine levels are essential to leucine activating mTor since glutamine acts as the transporter for leucine into the cell.
few ingest enough protein for optimal benefit, expecting PEDs to cover the shortfall.
Regs
Jim
