Just goes to show what i said to read from many sources to decide what is best for ones self. Documentation can be found pro and con. People should decide where the preponderance of good data points to. That affects them. \The language is a bit misleading and needs nuance. Larger LDL fell more sharply in comparison to the smaller, so it made the them higher only in proportion to the original baseline, even though total was lower. That’s also an older observational study showing association, there have been newer and more robust studies done since then.
Linking in case you’re curious.
RCT showing high dose rosu reduced smaller more than low dose therapy.
![]()
High-dose statin therapy with rosuvastatin reduces small dense LDL and MDA-LDL: The Standard versus high-dose therApy with Rosuvastatin for lipiD lowering (SARD) trial - PubMed
High-dose statin therapy significantly reduced the sd-LDL and MDA-LDL components of atherosclerotic lipoproteins without adverse events in comparison with low-dose statin therapy.pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Study on pita showing the same thing.
![]()
Frontiers | Small, Dense Low-Density Lipoprotein-Cholesterol and Atherosclerosis: Relationship and Therapeutic Strategies
Abstract: Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) plays an important role in the formation, incidence, and development of atherosclerosis (AS). Low-densi...www.frontiersin.org
I think focusing on life expectancy is too narrow a view. My fil for example is getting a stent put in next month, studies show that treatment for secondary prevention does affect life expectancy. The length of which relies on baseline health when starting. My husband otoh, is 40 and started a statin preventatively. There’s no data on that, but I am hopeful he will die with age related atherosclerosis and not early because of it. For someone like myself, the off values were hormone related and resolved without statins. I doubt my life expectancy would change significantly if I were to use statin therapy, as I don’t have the same risk factors.
Would be interested in reading the Lipitor study if you get a chance to link it.
Statins are pretty much of no interest for me. My last cholesterol test, never been on a statin was total 105, LDL-C 58, LIPOPROTEIN (a) less then 10, etc. So lowering my levels does not seem like a good idea as the levels i have point to shorter life span from a few studies i have seen Yet with low levels my CAC is 5-6X the average for my age. But no narrowing or blockages.
In the end all cholesterol is needed. Just how much is needed for optimal life span/quality. Hard to find good info on that. As everything is about heart events.
‘Bad’ Cholesterol Not As Bad As People Think, Shows Texas A&M Study
The so-called “bad cholesterol” – low-density lipoprotein commonly called LDL – may not be so bad after all.
Last edited:
