Surprisingly bad result on SP's cypionate

[Naugahydes]

No need to worry i got you all covered, you are welcome, we all can relax now, the moldovans still on top, this reminds me when i used to send out balkan gear for testing, result is almost perfect and i did not get it from any official reseller i got it from a local dealer in my hood lmfao
Very happy with the results, i was very anxious lol

Like the way you've color coded your table to the SP Vial! That's great news though - lots of fakes around atm as we can see..
Thx for testing

 

[cadafi]

All checked as genuine products

Then you are good

 

[mjolnirr]

Then you are good

He got 400 ng/dl on 400mg of Test C a week though. It was also Test C that I got my shitty result from. So while their Test E might be fine (thanks for sending to Janoshik btw!), there could be a problem with their Test C...

 

[Exotik]

And 400ng/dl is more below my nat level, so I think it's low quality and not test cyp inside. Maybe the whole company is corrupted that's why my codes checked as original on website and it doesn't mean anything...

 

[Bodyroidscom]

One of the 4 is labeled without SP site and the liquid is very clear and totally different smell. And all others is labeled completely wrong (laboratoty).
All off them have the same expiration date which is very strange.

Reveal the source from where you bought.100% is a counterfeit product.

 

[realroids]

One of the 4 is labeled without SP site and the liquid is very clear and totally different smell. And all others is labeled completely wrong (laboratoty).
All off them have the same expiration date which is very strange.

The official website is sp-laboratory.com
not sp-laboratoTy.com

 

[realroids]

The expiry date is in the following format 05.2024 and not 05/2024

 

[Naugahydes]

@Exotik
Obvious counterfeits but that doesn't explain the verification codes checking out. Are you sure you went to the genuine SP site for verification?
If you did then another option is try contacting SP themselves: support@

sp-laboratory.com

Be interesting to see their response on this!

 

[Exotik]

Reveal the source from where you bought.100% is a counterfeit product.

It doesn't even matter because is faked by them.
I will update with some photos

 

[Exotik]

I need to be mad to still believe in this gangs))
anyway...this is what I used, it was wrapped in watermark sp logo and sp green cap

 

[MadBret]

I need to be mad to still believe in this gangs))
anyway...this is what I used, it was wrapped in watermark sp logo and sp green cap

It's obviously fake, imo. And I doubt it originally came from sp. Your source likely didn't get it direct or he scammed you intentionally.

Idk why the vials check out when they are fakes unless they misprinted on their own labels, which isn't likely for an operation of their size.

Also, plenty of fake pharma shit available that checks out on the official government Turkish ITS app or whatever it's called.

So counterfeiters sometimes figure out ways to beat these safeguards.

I'd definitely get in touch with SP and make sure, but I'd assume you got fake shit from your source and I'd being looking for a new one for future needs if I were you.

Also, name and shame the source, at least once you've spoke with people from SP. Meso is about harm reduction and you could save some other guys from getting fucked.

Good luck.

 

[cadafi]

Yeah now that i compare vial pics, clearly counterfeit for sure, there is no more random test made than this one, i decided to test my vial simply because if i can´t get access to balkan´s testosterone then i ´d like to switch to SP since i am assuming it is the same quality and i got worried and very hesitant when i saw this thread.
If this post didn´t exist i would never even consider sending out sample for testing, this is how confident i am on these 2 brands

 

[cadafi]

@Exotik
Obvious counterfeits but that doesn't explain the verification codes checking out. Are you sure you went to the genuine SP site for verification?
If you did then another option is try contacting SP themselves: support@

sp-laboratory.com

Be interesting to see their response on this!

Mine checks as good but damn his also checks as good

 

[Clyde]

Mine checks as good but damn his also checks as good

All a counterfeiter has to do is get their hands on one authentic vial and duplicate the authorization code. You can check an authentication code as many times as you like, and it will check out good every time.

Until all the sources using this authentication system disable the code after one check, the potential issue with counterfeits will continue.

 

[Liska]

All a counterfeiter has to do is get their hands on one authentic vial and duplicate the authorization code. You can check an authentication code as many times as you like, and it will check out good every time.

Until all the sources using this authentication system disable the code after one check, the potential issue with counterfeits will continue.

Are authorization and authentication codes different entities? Assuming the displayed tracker for how many times a code has been checked is working correctly, is there a functional difference between a code being disabled after one check and that number showing as >1?

The uncomfy truth is that perfect counterfeits (can) exist and cases like these are just the imperfect, lower quality ones being exposed, which deludes the community at large into believing a product that will pass all the checks being discussed here must be the real thing.

 

[Exotik]

All a counterfeiter has to do is get their hands on one authentic vial and duplicate the authorization code. You can check an authentication code as many times as you like, and it will check out good every time.

Until all the sources using this authentication system disable the code after one check, the potential issue with counterfeits will continue.

Exactly my pov when I received those vials but how do you explain that I was the first one wich authenticated it? For me it was just a label misprinted by SP.

 

[Clyde]

Are authorization and authentication codes different entities? Assuming the displayed tracker for how many times a code has been checked is working correctly, is there a functional difference between a code being disabled after one check and that number showing as >1?

The uncomfy truth is that perfect counterfeits (can) exist and cases like these are just the imperfect, lower quality ones being exposed, which deludes the community at large into believing a product that will pass all the checks being discussed here must be the real thing.

I used authorization and authentication meaning the same thing and probably should have used authentification in both cases, (my spellcheck doesn't like the later) AFAIK.

I've brought this subject up in the past, and either showing how many times the code has been checked, or eliminating the code from the database after one check would both work equally well.

It seems deceptive at the very least to offer an authentification code check that is so easily circumvented. Perhaps I'm missing something though?

 

[Liska]

It seems deceptive at the very least to offer an authentification code check that is so easily circumvented. Perhaps I'm missing something though?

What do you mean by 'easily circumvented', is what I wrote not the case? I can see a counter for the number of times it has been checked on the screenshot posted.

 

[GuerillaPete]

What do you mean by 'easily circumvented', is what I wrote not the case? I can see a counter for the number of times it has been checked on the screenshot posted.

Some people just don't get it ! And Alin is a scumbag because someone said so 8 years ago.

 

[realroids]

The first step when buying an SP product is to check if the source is an official distributor. That's us and a few other reliable sources here. As for the case with this code, we sent the information to be verified. We will get back with a response.