Sweet spot for test/eq cycle

how is it pointless?
to summarize quickly and from memory he basically says anabolics are divided into 3 categories and when you form a cycle, 1 compound from each should be used. eq and test are in the same classification so no need to run them together. he goes into a bunch of fancy science as to why but it's beyond me explain.
 
to summarize quickly and from memory he basically says anabolics are divided into 3 categories and when you form a cycle, 1 compound from each should be used. eq and test are in the same classification so no need to run them together. he goes into a bunch of fancy science as to why but it's beyond me explain.
Link to video by any chance?
 
to summarize quickly and from memory he basically says anabolics are divided into 3 categories and when you form a cycle, 1 compound from each should be used. eq and test are in the same classification so no need to run them together. he goes into a bunch of fancy science as to why but it's beyond me explain.
I sort of base my cycles off the same approach. A test based steroid but normally test, a dht based steroid, and a nandrolone based. It’s usually test, npp, mast. Covers all 3 but I get the principle behind it
 
My best T + Eq run probably was 400/600. I really liked being on it. Cosmetic effect was great and I had that full look. Side effects were pretty minimal. If I cycle again I'll perhaps repeat this one.
 
I have to run my test at 2:1 but again everyone is different, I like it at 600mg can run it safely at this dose up to 16-20 weeks, I titrate my dosage up to this starting at 300mg then upping dose every 4-6 weeks.
 
Possibly a bit stronger anabolic, availability for some people and price perhaps being the most obvious reason. There are those outliers who are sensitive to primo or vice versa. Some people just don't trust sources and always assume anavar and primobolan are fake. Just my thoughts.

I think both are amazing steroids to be honest, they provide similar cosmetic effect, similar gains, mild side effects and are like brothers or at least cousins.

When it comes to safety I think here primo wins. But then again I have had a discussion with @Type-IIx and if I'm not mistaken he said at lower dosages they both are good candidates to cruise on. What we call now a sports TRT or TRT+, I guess.
I think typeII unearthed the factoid that eq has been at approved at higher safety levels than Primo and I’ve read a lot anecdotal evidence evidence that it’s as good or better than nandrolone for joint support / relief. I’m going to run it in a bulk this summer. Worried about the appetite but if I don’t get it then it’s probably good in a cut right?
 
I think typeII unearthed the factoid that eq has been at approved at higher safety levels than Primo and I’ve read a lot anecdotal evidence evidence that it’s as good or better than nandrolone for joint support / relief. I’m going to run it in a bulk this summer. Worried about the appetite but if I don’t get it then it’s probably good in a cut right?
Currently at week 11 running 500 test cyp/600 eq and the appetite has been remarkably high. Im not a big appetite person naturally so I notice the difference. Im never not hungry.
 

Sponsors

Latest posts

Back
Top