Bizzark1
Member
Worth remembering, the vast majority of people have little to be concerned about in regards to high HCT unless they have polycythemia vera
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Just read a study where mortality rate of ppl was lower for ppl with an HCT from 48 to 52. With 54 to be the maximum healthy limit.Worth remembering, the vast majority of people have little to be concerned about in regards to high HCT unless they have polycythemia vera
@Nidus
In your previous posts you cite "articles" and "studies" as your source for this information (TB500 in high doses causes Erythrocytosis, or Secondary Polycythemia Vera)...
I understand TGF-β (Transforming Growth Factor-beta) has been studied to "influence"
erythropoiesis (red blood cell production), but that's not the same as erythrocytosis (increased or significantly high red cell mass or red blood cells). Simply put... production versus saturation.
TGF-β can "influence" many physiological functions. However, a peptide (i.e. TB500) that may increase or promote TGF-β function doesn't necessarily equate to development to harmful degree.
It would be helpful if you could provide/cite a study where erythropoietin (EPO), and increase thereof, is actually measured. Otherwise, to surmise anecdotes from Reddit—the place where irrational ideas and flawed logic go to die—are accurate, warrants substantial "scrutiny."
Just read a study where mortality rate of ppl was lower for ppl with an HCT from 48 to 52. With 54 to be the maximum healthy limit.
So it seems it's better to have an higher HCT than a lower one all things considered
All things considered so you need to have BP and other possible parameters in check, if you have those an higher hematocrit seems like it's beneficialI could imagine that just alone the oxygen transport is beneficial but i wonder how this would change if you have high HK, high thrombocytes and slightly elevated BP.
All things considered so you need to have BP and other possible parameters in check, if you have those an higher hematocrit seems like it's beneficial
The thrombotic features would make a higher HCT more of a concern id imagine.I could imagine that just alone the oxygen transport is beneficial but i wonder how this would change if you have high HK, high thrombocytes and slightly elevated BP.
thats not used for erythrocytosis.... which we are talking aboutPeginterferon Alfa-2a (PEG)
Ropeginterferon alfa-2b-njft (ROPEG)
Besremi looks to be a brand name for Ropeg.
Anyone try these yet?
That is erythrocytosis.(Could argue polycythemia)Hope this could clear things up and help a bit more, i am happy to talk about this in direct messages too as its really hard to find proper information regarding this and i find it an interesting topic overall
mejorquenotengasprisa porquesecogesutiempo paramandar y nitecuento loque tarda enllegar, pasencia amigoAnyone ordered international to Spain with this guy and had any success?
Spaceman,thats not used for erythrocytosis.... which we are talking about
Spaceman,
Just to clarify...
Erythrocytosis is the umbrella both polycythemia vera (the cancer), and secondary polycythemia vera (external or AAS induced) fall under... is that your understanding as well?
So, those medications are for polycythemia vera (cancer), correct?
Therefore, we with AAS induced erythrocytosis (secondary polycythemia vera) are still SOL.
Quite interesting to see, i came across a similar study from Dean, a UK Endocrinologist, he shared it on his Instagram Story in which a HK of 48-50 is considered healthy as long as you remain active and do sports.
I personally always get very frequent headaches once i my HK goes over 49
Dont know his last name, he does this anabolic round table with Vig. Steve. Dean himself shares a few interesting bits every now and thenWhich "Dean" in UK Endocrinology are you referring? There's four of them. I went to school with one. I wonder if it's my classmate.
Ok, yes, PV is the cancer, but a discrepancy in the remaining term(s) for "external" factors (such as AAS).Polycythemia/Erthrocyotosis having a high hgb/hcg/r c
Can be caused by PV or other conditions that may increase erythropoietin levels.
Polycythemia vera is a cancerous condition.
They try to not use the term polycythemia(not vera) to prevent confusion.
Those drugs are for the cancerous condition.
You won't get secondary polycythemia vera from AAS.
But you can get Erthrocyotosis (technically polycythemia) from AAS
I would clarify that term with your doctor about " secondary PV"No worries bro. My understanding (and my hematologist's diagnosis) for AAS induced erythrocytosis is "Secondary PV." After going through a search and viewing how it's defined online, I see your way of defining/term is correct. However, I also see that Secondary PV is also correct (I think you'll find that as well).
Spaceman,I would clarify that term with your doctor about " secondary PV"
You can't get a secondary PV from AAS. If does not give a positive JAK2 mutation
Secondary PV...Spaceman,
Please take a look at the below linked paper... this is where I'm getting that "definition." Essentially, they are terming anything other than cancerous PV as "secondary." Let me know if you extrapolate the same conclusion.
