The Lobster International, US and EU Domestic HGH, PEPTIDES and Turkish Pharmacy

Guys I want to give to Lobster semaglutide a try, 9$ for 5mg sounds crazy, but I wonder, since I want to start at 0.25mg a week, I dont think it will last 2 months once i add the BAC water, how can I do?
 
Im so curious why most all ugl outfits went away from the 2mg sema as still lots only take .25 to .5 a week
Almost no one is using sema anymore, tirz is what most of everyone wants.

Sema is so cheap anyway that ppl don't care much if it degrades or not. I have various test on Tirzepatide degradation but can't find any on Semaglutide. There is no interest
 
My HGH international order (orange caps) from early February also have no vacuum.

As TheLobster has so far been open about providing tests and offers more tests than others (such as sterility tests), I don't see this as a problem until someone proves otherwise with lab results.

 
I honestly don't think it tested well. 95% purity and .21 dimer is not how it was advertised.
The dimer isn't a concern...
Curious to hear your thoughts.
@Ghoul can't keep up with the conversation at all. He doesn't know what's going on. He accused me of making a deal because I got "vacuum less vials " so lobster it for me.. my vials came from China... Lol

The ones with no vacuum came from turkey(also came from months ago)

He also said the vacuum less had significant degradation after a few weeks but that batch was sent months ago.

He also says @Sampei is now piggy backing off of my test results, which is why he is coming to defend me

He cannot create and original thought nor he has done any testing of his own. So he really is piggy backing off of everyone else

I bet he is going to avoid addressing my post or redirect it into some dumb shit like he always does.

He is just a fucking troll.
 
Last edited:
But how much of an impact it will have is an empirical question, and Lobster provided a number of useful data points on that. The 10IU results do seem to support accelerated deterioration, both in terms of dimer content and purity.

But the 50IU vials show no such deterioration, even though, as Lobster pointed out, the ratio of puck volume to air in greater in those vials.

What is your explanation for these divergent results? At face value, the results would suggest that lack of vacuum could accelerate deterioration, but that it will not always happen. That is, there seem to be some confounders. But what could those be?


The dimer isn't a concern...

@Ghoul can't keep up with the conversation at all. He doesn't know what's going on. He accused me of making a deal because I got "vacuum less vials " so lobster it for me.. my vials came from China... Lol

The ones with no vacuum came from turkey(also came from months ago)

He also said the vacuum less had significant degradation after a few weeks but that batch was sent months ago.

He also says @Sampei is now piggy backing off of my test results, which is why he is coming to defend me

He cannot create and original thought nor he has done any testing of his own. So he really is piggy backing off of everyone else

I bet he is going to avoid addressing my post or redirect it into some dumb shit like he always does.

He is just a fucking troll.

My HGH international order (orange caps) from early February also have no vacuum.

As TheLobster has so far been open about providing tests and offers more tests than others (such as sterility tests), I don't see this as a problem until someone proves otherwise with lab results.


Reminder: 6 months no vacuum, stored in refrigerator

1742318456515.webp
 
The dimer isn't a concern...

Seems like one of those things: just because Jano could measure it, people talked about it a lot.

Maybe the pharma standard should apply: "Aggregates >4%? yes or no" because there is a study showing aggregates don't cause immunogenicity anyway.

And vacuum doesn't seem to be a concern if you're using it within 6 months. The 10 IU vacuumless vial still had <1%

1742319496649.webp
 
Seems like one of those things: just because Jano could measure it, people talked about it a lot.

Maybe the pharma standard should apply: "Aggregates >4%? yes or no" because there is a study showing aggregates don't cause immunogenicity anyway.

And vacuum doesn't seem to be a concern if you're using it within 6 months. The 10 IU vacuumless vial still had <1%

View attachment 321629
People really should take it with a grain of salt with what @Ghoul says. This has nothing to do with shilling with a source of pigging backing off test results.


but logic and data collection is more important.
 
Back
Top