THIS IS AN INVITATION TO EXPERIMENT WITH ME TO SEE THE EFFICACY OF THIS THEORY!
I’ve been ruminating and experimenting with a concept called the “no cycle”. Before I get started, I’ll give some background.
A long cycle can be done with long, short, or no esthers. Right? A short cycle can be done with short or no esthers. Right? The benefits of long cycles is levels remain appropriate to avoid side effects. The benefits of a short cycle is the lack of, or minuteness of suppression. Also, a cycle means repetition of compounds, even in regards of dosages. Right?
A “no cycle”, therefore, is a single administration of a compound or compounds. Tony Huge gets a lot of flack for being a dumbass. However, past the antics and obvious misapplications, he has been right about the anabolic matrix. Even Derek from MorePlatesMoreDates has lauded the use of simultaneous synergistic components. Famous is the combination of an aromatizable and human growth hormone, even injectable insulin, to promote hyperplasic IGF1 conversion.
For example, pairing trenbolone and testosterone, pre-workout, fulfills the requirements for mass building and conversion to estradiol. If paired with human growth hormone and human chorionic gonadotropin, post-workout, it will promote IGF1 via estradiol and get your balls back on track, if they needed to be in the first place. YK-11, pre-workout, should saturate the muscles through the stimulus and prepare the way for growth during recuperation; while post-workout MK-677 will continue to produce HGH and have a similar endogenous effect as HCG.
That being said, a no cycle can be done with any esthers or lack thereof. Yet, I would tend shorter for purposes of lifestyle. Longer esthers are best suited for professional sport. Reminder: long esthers are, probably, best used on-cycle.
Accumulated gains are a real thing, if this is done frequently enough. And suppression can be avoided if done infrequently enough. This is done best with no esthers. That’s been my thought process. Pair it with Mentzer-esque training?
I want to come up with a synergistic way to use compounds without being a slave to the needle on a schedule. Thoughts?
I’ve been ruminating and experimenting with a concept called the “no cycle”. Before I get started, I’ll give some background.
A long cycle can be done with long, short, or no esthers. Right? A short cycle can be done with short or no esthers. Right? The benefits of long cycles is levels remain appropriate to avoid side effects. The benefits of a short cycle is the lack of, or minuteness of suppression. Also, a cycle means repetition of compounds, even in regards of dosages. Right?
A “no cycle”, therefore, is a single administration of a compound or compounds. Tony Huge gets a lot of flack for being a dumbass. However, past the antics and obvious misapplications, he has been right about the anabolic matrix. Even Derek from MorePlatesMoreDates has lauded the use of simultaneous synergistic components. Famous is the combination of an aromatizable and human growth hormone, even injectable insulin, to promote hyperplasic IGF1 conversion.
For example, pairing trenbolone and testosterone, pre-workout, fulfills the requirements for mass building and conversion to estradiol. If paired with human growth hormone and human chorionic gonadotropin, post-workout, it will promote IGF1 via estradiol and get your balls back on track, if they needed to be in the first place. YK-11, pre-workout, should saturate the muscles through the stimulus and prepare the way for growth during recuperation; while post-workout MK-677 will continue to produce HGH and have a similar endogenous effect as HCG.
That being said, a no cycle can be done with any esthers or lack thereof. Yet, I would tend shorter for purposes of lifestyle. Longer esthers are best suited for professional sport. Reminder: long esthers are, probably, best used on-cycle.
Accumulated gains are a real thing, if this is done frequently enough. And suppression can be avoided if done infrequently enough. This is done best with no esthers. That’s been my thought process. Pair it with Mentzer-esque training?
I want to come up with a synergistic way to use compounds without being a slave to the needle on a schedule. Thoughts?
Last edited:
