4545
New Member
I have access to IP's Trenbolone Cyclohexylmethylcarbonate (Parabolan). Is it any better then regular tren? I never got a chance to use Para, its going to cost right around the same price. Vets how do you guys feel?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
einstein1905 said:I'm curious to hear exactly how people that claim parabolan to be superior to any other form of tren can explain this. It's a different ester....that's it.
My thoughts exactlytazz said:Different esters don't mean shit. That is just like trying to say test cyp is stronger than test prop. Test is test and tren is tren. The only difference is the injection frequency . . . .
tazz said:Different esters don't mean shit. That is just like trying to say test cyp is stronger than test prop. Test is test and tren is tren. The only difference is the injection frequency . . . .
Everyone that uses AAS should already know this and account for this when they're dosing. Tren is tren....test is test.aneas said:Well on a mg per mg basis prop is stronger. It has a higher absorption rate. So only difference is not injection frequency.
einstein1905 said:Everyone that uses AAS should already know this and account for this when they're dosing. Tren is tren....test is test.
aneas said:Did I say test was not test?
einstein1905 said:No, that was me that said that
Deacon said:the guys I know who have used tren and para from one time to the next state that with para they used less - got better results with less sides -
I may try it myself next cycle - of course the tren enth I am using now is blow your mind great!
I have no lab reports ot stats to back this up just reports from lifters who have used both
