Trenbolone Cyclohexylmethylcarbonate (Parabolan)

4545

New Member
I have access to IP's Trenbolone Cyclohexylmethylcarbonate (Parabolan). Is it any better then regular tren? I never got a chance to use Para, its going to cost right around the same price. Vets how do you guys feel?
 
I GUARANTEE you its NOT REAL PARABOLAN !!!

tren acetate or enanthate maybe, but not "Cyclohexylmethylcarbonate". LOL thats a good one!
 
I'm curious to hear exactly how people that claim parabolan to be superior to any other form of tren can explain this. It's a different ester....that's it.
 
einstein1905 said:
I'm curious to hear exactly how people that claim parabolan to be superior to any other form of tren can explain this. It's a different ester....that's it.

Different esters don't mean shit. That is just like trying to say test cyp is stronger than test prop. Test is test and tren is tren. The only difference is the injection frequency . . . .
 
tazz said:
Different esters don't mean shit. That is just like trying to say test cyp is stronger than test prop. Test is test and tren is tren. The only difference is the injection frequency . . . .
My thoughts exactly
 
I personally get less sides from the longer acting Esters.Maybe it because you have less peaks and dips in the bloodstream with the longer acting esters.Also,Trenbolone HexaHydroBenzyl Carbonate is available,dont know if IP stuff is real,but it is available
 
the guys I know who have used tren and para from one time to the next state that with para they used less - got better results with less sides -

I may try it myself next cycle - of course the tren enth I am using now is blow your mind great!

I have no lab reports ot stats to back this up just reports from lifters who have used both
 
tazz said:
Different esters don't mean shit. That is just like trying to say test cyp is stronger than test prop. Test is test and tren is tren. The only difference is the injection frequency . . . .


Well on a mg per mg basis prop is stronger. It has a higher absorption rate. So only difference is not injection frequency.
 
aneas said:
Well on a mg per mg basis prop is stronger. It has a higher absorption rate. So only difference is not injection frequency.
Everyone that uses AAS should already know this and account for this when they're dosing. Tren is tren....test is test.
 
einstein1905 said:
Everyone that uses AAS should already know this and account for this when they're dosing. Tren is tren....test is test.

They should but they dont.

Did I say test was not test?
 
Hey Deacon, who's tren enanthate are you useing?



Deacon said:
the guys I know who have used tren and para from one time to the next state that with para they used less - got better results with less sides -

I may try it myself next cycle - of course the tren enth I am using now is blow your mind great!

I have no lab reports ot stats to back this up just reports from lifters who have used both
 
Back
Top