Dang-1
Member
Test mast tren is a very proven stack. Look up type2x post on TMT for a really good read.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I took all this compounds in my past and to be honest i didn't had any side efects...I like
test
tren
masteron to balance out test
25 dbol 25mg winstrol on the last 4-6 weeks... adds some strength, mostly aggression and great sexual side effects, i can last for ever, i think its the dbol doing that, winstrol is adding some strength and aggression.
deca instead of masteron may be too much, i took deca once didnt really like it, could only get 80% hard but maybe with tren it would help get harder, who knows.
Then take whatever you want. Why did you even make this thread when your mind is already made up? You asked for opinions and then immediately dismissed every single one.I took all this compounds in my past and to be honest i didn't had any side efects...
"In tren we trust"
I said i really appreciate your opinions guys, thank youI get that you feel judged, surely doesn’t feel good.
For a slightly different perspective AAS are medically administered by KG of body weight so those comments aren’t out of line.
Another concept is; All the helpful members with experience have been just starting out at one point and can recognize when natural growth is quite possible with diet and training alone, imparting this knowledge is extremely helpful! This is an online forum so that info isn’t going to be delivered in a gentle manner but it’s very valid experience. Getting shrugged Kinda off leaves those who helped with a feeling of why bother.
Thanks, I've already start it, everything ok at the moment, more determination flying around i sneak another 2 meals pd... for the start is lovelyNo matter where you post online, it's common for individuals to express negative opinions. It's essential to extract valuable information from these interactions and not take their judgments personally, recognizing that many people may use the internet as an outlet for their personal issues.
Regarding your chosen cycle, it appears reasonable, and if it aligns with your goals, there's no reason not to proceed. It's worth noting that I don't personally use Caber; instead, I recommend Pyridoxal-5-Phosphate (P5P), which you can include with your morning vitamins.
I find your current cycle favorable. My experience has been similar, and I haven't encountered significant issues. It's important to remember that not everyone experiences all the potential side effects of substances like tren or deca. Some individuals tend to share negative experiences online without even having tried the same cycle you're on. These individuals often prefer to remain within the safety of their homes, where they can criticize and belittle others online.
lolI took all this compounds in my past and to be honest i didn't had any side efects...
"In tren we trust"
You are literally telling a 165lb 5’7 guy that over 1g of gear on a cycke including 400mg tren and Dbol that this is favorable run and to basically ignore all the negative comments because the negative comments are basically just armchair bodybuilders.No matter where you post online, it's common for individuals to express negative opinions. It's essential to extract valuable information from these interactions and not take their judgments personally, recognizing that many people may use the internet as an outlet for their personal issues.
Regarding your chosen cycle, it appears reasonable, and if it aligns with your goals, there's no reason not to proceed. It's worth noting that I don't personally use Caber; instead, I recommend Pyridoxal-5-Phosphate (P5P), which you can include with your morning vitamins.
I find your current cycle favorable. My experience has been similar, and I haven't encountered significant issues. It's important to remember that not everyone experiences all the potential side effects of substances like tren or deca. Some individuals tend to share negative experiences online without even having tried the same cycle you're on. These individuals often prefer to remain within the safety of their homes, where they can criticize and belittle others online.
Bro, i run before more than that, so I'm talking from my personal experience, is not to much...You are literally telling a 165lb 5’7 guy that over 1g of gear on a cycke including 400mg tren and Dbol that this is favorable run and to basically ignore all the negative comments because the negative comments are basically just armchair bodybuilders.
I’m paraphrasing but seriously this is your advice?
There are a few guys who posted recent cycle logs who I know their stats and cycle’s because you can search it. Here’s an example; I think Drago is 250lbs now and just ran 350mg test p and 350mg mast p for his last run. I’m only 195 and won’t go above 800mg week of gentle stuff IE mast,primo,test,NPP.
At this point I feel like posting is a waste and I might as well be blowing bubbles instead but your advice seems downright dangerously cavalier.
Maybe, post a picture of yourself to show what 165lbs is at 5'7. People sometimes forget the difference of how a few inches does to muscle distribution and over all appearance.Bro, i run before more than that, so I'm talking from my personal experience, is not to much...
Did u experience yourself or you talking ftom whatever you find when you search on google?
I've already post itMaybe, post a picture of yourself to show what 165lbs is at 5'7. People sometimes forget the difference of how a few inches does to muscle distribution and over all appearance.
A 165lbs Derek Lunsford will look thicker than Samson Dauda at the same bodyweight.
I’ve run cycles since 1998. At my biggest pre injury I was 235 at 10-12% around 2006 and that was on 350mg week tren max. I just told you I finished a bulk running mast/test 700mg week at 210 and now I’m cut down to 195.Bro, i run before more than that, so I'm talking from my personal experience, is not to much...
Did u experience yourself or you talking ftom whatever you find when you search on google?
I happened to come across your photo and have noticed that individuals of similar stature exist in Latin and Asian countries running same amounts. However, regardless of your appearance, it's a universal truth that people may critique and belittle you if you don't align with their preconceived notions.I've already post it
Have a look up...
Precisely. There's little merit in investing more of your valuable time in this discussion, sir. You've expressed your viewpoint, and now it's prudent to observe the unfolding events. It's important not to become overly agitated simply because others may choose not to follow your advice.I’ve run cycles since 1998. At my biggest pre injury I was 235 at 10-12% around 2006 and that was on 350mg week tren max. I just told you I finished a bulk running mast/test 700mg week at 210 and now I’m cut down to 195.
Bigtom who posted helpful shit in your thread is 250lbs and has his contest photos up, he also posted his last off season blast of 500mg test and 350mg NPP.
I’m done posting shit with you because your just going to blast over a gram of gear regardless of your body’s actual needs to bulk because you obviously know best.
BingoAll these heroes pretending running lower the dose the better, if someone wants to run 3G they can run 3G
Yes seems like all these new youtubers are advocating 200mg per week and rolling around 260lbsBingo
It's rather perplexing why certain groups of individuals assume that their approach should be universally followed. From my experience, I've rarely encountered individuals on lower dosages who surpass my own size and strength. In fact, when compared to what I'm aware of regarding other competitive athletes and their dosages, I wouldn't consider my own dosages particularly high.
In a separate context, I recently came across a YouTube video where a medical professional mentioned a study conducted in the EU. This study examined the health of healthy males using a weekly dosage of 600mg of testosterone, and the results demonstrated favorable health markers. It was suggested that such a study might not be conducted in the United States due to what was referred to as "Simps" like those advocating for lower dosages.