Trusted GH

[muscle96ss]

Muscles96 is an "administrator" for PM a censored PED source board that is the pulpit for GH generic vendors.

I think the colloquialism "having the fox guard the hen house" is much more appropriate than "trust", or "confidence", but that's me.

I doubt MH would be mum if SIMEC results mimicked those that I posted a while back on several of PMs GGH products!

Jim, I remember when you said that I was the owner of PM; that was a funny one. At least you have toned it down a bit to an "administrator". The truth, however, is I am just another member with no special privileges. I have been there since its inception and am well known and respected, but that is it, I have no special powers.

 

[muscle96ss]

I apologize for my ignorance in advance, but why is the fact that they are overdosed an issue. I understand wanting to accurately dose. With Hgh is it bad because they did something wrong in the process. I am starting to see what the good Dr. Is talking about. Theven product has to be dead nuts on ,outherwise it basically trash.

Another question. Being such a fragile compound I never hear much concern of shipping methods. The box's being tossed around ,and constant change in temperature, does concern me, or am I wrong?

Them being overdosed in itself isn't the issues. Its that the results showed the GH's to contain more GH than they actually contain. For example, they showed Serostim from a US pharmacy to contain 22.6iu. We know that this is definitely inaccurate. So, while the results would make all the sponsors look really really good, I am not going to post something that I know to be false.

 

[rpbb]

Them being overdosed in itself isn't the issues. Its that the results showed the GH's to contain more GH than they actually contain. For example, they showed Serostim from a US pharmacy to contain 22.6iu. We know that this is definitely inaccurate. So, while the results would make all the sponsors look really really good, I am not going to post something that I know to be false.

any word back from simec yet?

 

[mands]

Have you come to accept the limited AAS data showing a correlation with LVH is now persuasive enough to be concerned with the risk?

The last I remember is that you were unconvinced.

Hereditary(genetic factors) CBS?

mands

 

[CensoredBoardsSuck]

Hereditary(genetic factors) CBS?

mands

Very possible, Mands. I wish the was more research.

 

[mands]

Very possible, Mands. I wish the was more research.

I've seen one and possibly two? I would have to go back and look.

On the other hand I do believe AAS, PED's etc. could very likely increase chance or amplify genetic pre-determined problems(if it is indeed genetics).

mands

 

[rpbb]

I've seen one and possibly two? I would have to go back and look.

On the other hand I do believe AAS, PED's etc. could very likely increase chance or amplify genetic pre-determined problems(if it is indeed genetics).

mands

I think anything in excess has a greater chance of screwing up your system regardless of genetics. I cringe at times when I hear some of the gear and hgh dosages that some people run

 

[Dr JIM]

The results were grossly over dosed, which would be good news for the sources, so I can't agree with you on this one.

And you clearly missed my point!

Check out the GH assays I posted earlier as they reveal the GH quality NOT noted by SIMEC and MH was doing everything he could to discredit the tests I had conducted thru a university lab.

SIMEC comes by and posts a highly complimentary analysis and MH is mum!

My point what would MH be doing IF SIMEC posted results similar to mine.

Will rest assured they would NEVER end up on PRO MUSCLE,
and that's the "fox guarding the henhouse", lol!

More to come

 

[mands]

I think anything in excess has a greater chance of screwing up your system regardless of genetics. I cringe at times when I hear some of the gear and hgh dosages that some people run

I do as well @rpbb! I can't really fathom what some guys/girls take.

I myself have increased my doses over the years, but feel like I'm at a fairly low dose compared to most especially at my weight. I feel like I run a pretty high dose of GH when I do blast. My regular AAS use when blasting is fairly week in my opinion.

It's all about Food, Training and Rest for me and some drugs

mands

 

[muscle96ss]

any word back from simec yet?

Nope, they are still re-examining the data. They said if there are no errors then they suspect it is the testing methodology that is flawed. Not real sure what they mean or what that means for all their tests they have previously done.

 

[muscle96ss]

And you clearly missed my point!

Check out the GH assays I posted earlier as they reveal the GH quality NOT noted by SIMEC and MH was doing everything he could to discredit the tests I had conducted thru a university lab.

SIMEC comes by and posts a highly complimentary analysis and MH is mum!

My point what would MH be doing IF SIMEC posted results similar to mine.

Will rest assured they would NEVER end up on PRO MUSCLE,
and that's the "fox guarding the henhouse", lol!

More to come

Jim EVERYBODY already knows that your tests were wrong; get over it and get with the times!!

Secondly, the more you talk on this thread the more you are proving my point that you have no idea what you are talking about.

 

[Bob Dole]

They said if there are no errors then they suspect it is the testing methodology that is flawed. Not real sure what they mean or what that means for all their tests they have previously done.

That sounds like a refund would be expected.