ballsofsteel5000
New Member
Just in case anyone didn't read this when it first came out:
U.S. Postal Service Logging All Mail for Law Enforcement
"As the world focuses on the high-tech spying of the National Security Agency, the misplaced card offers a rare glimpse inside the seemingly low-tech but prevalent snooping of the United States Postal Service.
Mr. Pickering was targeted by a longtime surveillance system called mail covers, a forerunner of a vastly more expansive effort, the Mail Isolation Control and Tracking program, in which Postal Service computers photograph the exterior of every piece of paper mail that is processed in the United States — about 160 billion pieces last year. It is not known how long the government saves the images.
Together, the two programs show that postal mail is subject to the same kind of scrutiny that the National Security Agency has given to telephone calls and e-mail.
The mail covers program, used to monitor Mr. Pickering, is more than a century old but is still considered a powerful tool. At the request of law enforcement officials, postal workers record information from the outside of letters and parcels before they are delivered. (Opening the mail would require a warrant.) The information is sent to the law enforcement agency that asked for it. Tens of thousands of pieces of mail each year undergo this scrutiny."
So, the USPS collects metadata about all of your mail that law enforcement can then utilize at any time by putting in a (never denied) request to USPS -- all without a warrant. This means that even if they need a warrant to search the actual contents of your mail, they can find out virtually all else they need to know about you save the specific contents of packages; further, I bet the metadata they collect can serve as the basis for warrants to look into said packages.
Hypothesis: law enforcement can quickly "follow the trail" to virtually everybody involved with a busted source via the mail system by requesting the metadata for said source, and so on for persons involved with those persons, using this metadata as pretext to get warrants to search all relevant packages.
It's generally said that USPS is safer than private delivery methods for sending out goodies. Does this news make that claim out of date?
U.S. Postal Service Logging All Mail for Law Enforcement
Code:
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/07/04/us/monitoring-of-snail-mail.html?hp&_r=2&pagewanted=all&
"As the world focuses on the high-tech spying of the National Security Agency, the misplaced card offers a rare glimpse inside the seemingly low-tech but prevalent snooping of the United States Postal Service.
Mr. Pickering was targeted by a longtime surveillance system called mail covers, a forerunner of a vastly more expansive effort, the Mail Isolation Control and Tracking program, in which Postal Service computers photograph the exterior of every piece of paper mail that is processed in the United States — about 160 billion pieces last year. It is not known how long the government saves the images.
Together, the two programs show that postal mail is subject to the same kind of scrutiny that the National Security Agency has given to telephone calls and e-mail.
The mail covers program, used to monitor Mr. Pickering, is more than a century old but is still considered a powerful tool. At the request of law enforcement officials, postal workers record information from the outside of letters and parcels before they are delivered. (Opening the mail would require a warrant.) The information is sent to the law enforcement agency that asked for it. Tens of thousands of pieces of mail each year undergo this scrutiny."
So, the USPS collects metadata about all of your mail that law enforcement can then utilize at any time by putting in a (never denied) request to USPS -- all without a warrant. This means that even if they need a warrant to search the actual contents of your mail, they can find out virtually all else they need to know about you save the specific contents of packages; further, I bet the metadata they collect can serve as the basis for warrants to look into said packages.
Hypothesis: law enforcement can quickly "follow the trail" to virtually everybody involved with a busted source via the mail system by requesting the metadata for said source, and so on for persons involved with those persons, using this metadata as pretext to get warrants to search all relevant packages.
It's generally said that USPS is safer than private delivery methods for sending out goodies. Does this news make that claim out of date?
Last edited:
