Photon
Member
Regarding labels: some clients have requested labels,
What labels can we request for?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Regarding labels: some clients have requested labels,
Hey man, thanks for your input.No I'm not saying this, I'm saying in the past the batches we received from the same factory were inconsistent. We had one batch for example that tested well fresh from the fsctory and 1 month later the same kits we tested started degrading quite quick and tested not at all like we expected.
Did we get a classic bait and switch? Like we bought few kits tested well then when we ordered 500+ kits we got shit? I'm not sure.
In my opinion it was more like they didn't get the formulation of the GH well and it degraded quite a lot after a bit, it's something thst can be seen with peptides in general, fresh batch test awesome few weeks later purity etc goes down the drain.
I can't predict future producrs, I'm just reporting my experience with the factory.
LET IT BE CLEAR I NEVER DEALT WITH MARK WELL, I HAVE DEALT WITH ANOTHER RESELLER THAT SELLS THE SAME PRODUCTS FROM THE SAME FACTORY, BUT IT WASN'T MARK.
there are many all reselling from there, Lola is another one for example, can be found on TG.
Peptides something is another one, I gotta check the name too many fucking names.
It does look a bit sketchy tho when he post the labtest of the 10IU HGH and then send a completely different batch.
I rest my case anyway, I would suggest just to take the offer of testing but wait a bit before doing so, let thst HGH sit few weeks and then test it.
I srsly hope they got it right because getting 98% purity low dimer is what we all want and we have no problem paying good money for it... But it must be what it is advertised, without any surprises.
btw your fsctory produced awesome HGH the first time we bought it with a test same. As. The one you posted. Then when we retested the same HGH 3 weeks later, it had lost 3+% purity and had high dimer content.
this is what I meant, the fact that there is a test showing good results at first, and that some parts of the orders were seized, for me its more credible that probably the products were looking the same but not the same?That much of a decline in only 3 weeks
Is there a theory on how this might have occurred?
Bad batches typically test bad from the first test; not used to seeing rapid decline in quality (unless it was within testing error range)
is my understanding that GH is obviously one of, if not, the most delicate peptide when it comes to light, heat, moisture and movement.
Interesting!, will definitely have a browse.Not really
Search Lobster's thread where GH was tested and storage conditions didn't really impact GH purity or dimer
There are Jano tests
