Not entirely.
You're arguing against something that wasn't stated. I don't think that everybody should be on a statin. Most of the folks here, particularly in this thread are middle aged mean on AAS with varying degrees of lipid issues. Those folks definitely need to be on a statin. Given the increasing number of people dying from ASCVD every year, it's a straightforward argument to be made that more people should be, presuming we except the extensive research that shows improved outcomes from statin use.
So, you have a misguided notion that I won't feel quite good with low LDL and no means to support that. Lacking any plausible explanation for why you believe that, perhaps you should simply keep it to yourself. Consider the risk of being wrong. If I'm wrong and people manage their lipids too low, what happens? They have difficulty absorbing nutrients and experience a few other symptoms that are easily reversible by backing off the treatment. If you're wrong, people die.
In any case, I feel great. I am the healthiest 52yo that I know. I'm typically stronger and fitter than anyone of any age that I encounter in the gym.... Well, the weightlifting gym. There's some folks in the climbing gym that are like whoa.
View attachment 311528
For one, that's a personal decision and for two you have no grasp on the probabilities of what either course of action entails.
Probably doctors agree with my statement? I give approximately zero fucks what doctors think. There's a whole group of doctors that comprise the American College of Cardiologists for whom I already argued at length with supporting evidence why they are misguided. You think I give two shits what any random doctor thinks?
I'd aim for a bit lower than 100mg/dL, probably starting at 5mg/day which should yield a ~40% reduction in LDL. Presuming your ApoB tracks similarly, this will get you under 80mg/dL, the level below which Tom Dayspring recommends for folks with no other risk factors.
What the fuck are you even on about here? I should not use the best available literature to support my position, but rather I should rely on deduction?
ApoB is causal and necessary for the progression of ASCVD.
Yes, it's working quite well for me and I have plenty of actual evidence to support my opinion that it would work for others.
You need to fuck right off with that anti-science bullshit. I don't want to have to waste my time debunking misinformation.