Why does is cost more to loose weight

BigDrip

New Member
Why does is cost more to loose weight than to gain weight? Product wise.

Halo, spriopent clen, primos, winstrol, anavar all expensive compared to Deca, Test, D-Bol, Drol, etc.

It cant cost any more to manufacture the powders for winstrol than it does for enanthate. Or does it? Can someone answer this?
 
BigDrip said:
Why does is cost more to loose weight than to gain weight? Product wise.

Halo, spriopent clen, primos, winstrol, anavar all expensive compared to Deca, Test, D-Bol, Drol, etc.

It cant cost any more to manufacture the powders for winstrol than it does for enanthate. Or does it? Can someone answer this?

It raw materials of these products do vary greatly depending on product so this does explain some of the differences in pricing.

Shen
 
You want to drop weight cheap and effectively? A little test, a little EQ, a little T3 and some ECA. Taken care of.
 
My thread specifies "Product wise."
Was wondering about the product pricing only.

So the powder prices do differ.
 
I would explain it like this-----

There are no steroids that are made specifically for you to lose weight---

There are steroids that make you gain lean mass rather than bulk mass(which carries alot of water weight)

Therefore people who take these "cutting" drugs are usually doing cardio, dieting, and trying to loose weight(fat), therefore these are better drug choices--giving lean mass--without the problem of water weight

People who are fat are not going to be ripped simply by taking halo, winny, etc. without alot of dieting and cardio

These "cutting" drugs also carry a shorter half life in the body, therefore forcing the user to use more of the drug

That is how I would explain it---dont know if that is what you are looking for
 
Silverback said:
I would explain it like this-----

These "cutting" drugs also carry a shorter half life in the body, therefore forcing the user to use more of the drug



That makes sense.:cool:
 
Back
Top