will this UV light work for testing purposes

[tileguy123]

the uv lights on labmax are $30 + ship..

how do you guys think this amazon .com one will do :

http://www.amazon.com/Professional-Inspection-Flashlight-380-385nm-Ultraviolet/dp/B0013E3XVU

 

[mercury]

It might but you can get different test results, it is different wavelength.
so it is hard to say

labmax has to be 365 nm, good UV light is expensive

it is like asking can I use yellow light instead of red.

 

[tileguy123]

@mercury your analogy sucks locker room ball sack .

I asked if a 380 nm UV light was comparible to a 365nm . ..

 

[Colt44]

It is not TG. Testing protocol and equipment should be near identical to labmax and other testers.

Kind of like setting a blood work standard. If the same protocol is not followed, what are we comparing to? Know what I mean?

 

[tileguy123]

thank you Colt. I know youve tested so ill respect that as an accurate answer. just tryn to figure out how to wisely spend my $ right now. I have some GETM var, dbol, nolva, and clomid, and i should probably buck up and confirm they are what they are labled as before I take anything more from them.

then i also have some MS TE, TP i should test for every1s benifit. being 6 tests i need, and a uv i might as well just drop the dough on the 220$ kit.

 

[Colt44]

I just buy the refill kit. Bought the light on Amazon.

 

[tileguy123]

which light the lab max light is on Amazon? hit me with the link Colt..

and your saying the refill is just as good w/o the fancy dancy case huh?

 

[tileguy123]

and have you seen anyone test nolva/ clomid caps?

 

[mercury]

I just buy the refill kit. Bought the light on Amazon.

How much did you pay for this light ?

I have seen a lot advertised as a UV lights but they are just blue lights and they do not work.

 

[Colt44]

Here's the first one I bought that worked fine.

http://www.amazon.com/gp/aw/d/B004R...200_QL40&qid=1408577622&sr=8-1#ref=mp_s_a_1_1

 

[Colt44]

and have you seen anyone test nolva/ clomid caps?

@flenser I believe has

 

[tileguy123]

basically thats the same price as the light, though. plus the refill + a uv is only 30 less than the kit with the fancy case. damn

 

[tileguy123]

brother needs a break. i need to buy the whole kit, pay for bloodwork before and mid, and order some more shit from reliablerx. fuck .

 

[Colt44]

basically thats the same price as the light, though. plus the refill + a uv is only 30 less than the kit with the fancy case. damn

Haha..decisions decisions. Just buy the whole thing man.

 

[tileguy123]

yup my gf is gunna hang me , but hell yeah.. ima do it. get the kit ordered this week , and some pharma pct and hcg this time fuck the bullshit

 

[Dr JIM]

Fact is the use of UV light as the Lab-"Max standard significantly limits it's usefulness as an AAS assay.

The problem lies in the structural SIMILARITIES between one AAS compared to another.

Essentially all AAS begin with the progestagen structure,which consists of three (6 carbon) benzene rings and one (5 carbon) pyrole ring.

Combined this arrangement defines the "17 carbon,four ring polycyclic" skeleton common to ALL endogenous or exogenous AAS.?

Moreover for the function of an AAS to be maintained the FOUR RING POLYCYCLIC SKELETON must remain intact!
Consequently the only viable alterations are the addition or removal of relatively SMALL "FUNCTIONAL GROUP" such as a methy or ketone group.

And that is THE PROBLEM folks with UV testing. It is an excellent screening tool for the presence of ANY AAS, a borderline assay for determining an AAS sub-classification, such as progesterogwic anabolics and very poor at differentiating each AAS on a separate basis.

Regs
Jim